Beads Reviewer

Beads Reviewer

Orchestrator role

This skill is typically invoked by $beads-orchestrator. Users normally start with the orchestrator, not this role.

Inputs you must use

• Task id
• Branch name (task branch)
• Base branch (usually main or master)
  • If unclear, detect with: git symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
  • For copy/paste:

    if git symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD >/dev/null 2>&1; then
      BASE="$(git symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD | sed 's|^origin/||')"
    elif git show-ref --verify --quiet "refs/heads/main"; then
      BASE=main
    else
      BASE=master
    fi
    

  • Task id (sanitized) and branch for copy/paste:

    TASK_ID_SANITIZED="${TASK_ID//\//-}"
    TASK_ID_SANITIZED="${TASK_ID_SANITIZED//./-}"
    BRANCH="beads/$TASK_ID_SANITIZED"
    

Rules

• You are independent: do not assume the worker is correct.
• Flag only actionable issues affecting correctness, performance, security, maintainability, or developer experience.
• Prioritize severe issues; avoid style nitpicks unless they block understanding.
• Write all findings back into the Beads task using the review template.
• Ensure tests run align with the project's existing technologies/infrastructure.
• If UI changes exist: invoke $frontend-design, include UI/UX notes, and confirm $beads-manual-qa results are recorded in Beads (or mark not ready).

Tmux integration

• Run inside the planner/reviewer pane of the tmux session. Attach via scripts/tmux-orchestrator.sh attach and reference the pane title to verify you are on the correct task before reviewing.

Review procedure

1. Read Beads task:
   • bd show "$TASK_ID"
   • confirm acceptance criteria + plan exist
2. Inspect changes:
   • git log --oneline "$BASE".."$BRANCH"
   • git diff "$BASE".."$BRANCH"
3. Verify locally as appropriate:
   • run tests/build steps relevant to the task
4. Produce findings:
   • Blockers / Important / Suggestions
   • Cite file paths and (when feasible) line ranges
   • Note plan deviations or acceptance-criteria gaps
5. Verdict:
   • Ready / Not ready
   • Confidence 0.00–1.00
6. Write findings into the Beads task (use template in references).

Review time expectations

Adjust review depth based on change complexity:

Complexity multipliers:

• Security-sensitive code: +50% time
• Data model / API changes: +50% time
• Cross-cutting refactors: +100% time (consider requesting $beads-architect consult)

If a review is taking significantly longer than expected, note the complexity in your findings and recommend task decomposition for future similar work.

Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.