Call Cursor

Call Cursor Skill

Wrapper for invoking Cursor agent via CLI for code review and security analysis.

Overview

Cursor is specialized for:

• Security vulnerability detection
• Code quality assessment
• OWASP Top 10 compliance
• Best practices enforcement

Prerequisites

• cursor-agent CLI installed and accessible on PATH.

Expertise Weights

Usage

/call-cursor

CLI Invocation

cursor-agent --print --output-format json "<prompt>"

Flags

IMPORTANT: The prompt is a POSITIONAL argument at the END, not a flag.

Standard Prompts

Plan Validation (Phase 2)

cursor-agent --print --output-format json "
You are reviewing an implementation plan for security and code quality.

Read the plan JSON provided by the orchestrator (phase_outputs export).

Evaluate for:
1. Security vulnerabilities in proposed changes
2. Potential for injection attacks (SQL, XSS, command)
3. Authentication/authorization concerns
4. Input validation gaps
5. Secure coding practices
6. Test coverage for security scenarios

Return your assessment as JSON:
{
  \"agent\": \"cursor\",
  \"phase\": \"validation\",
  \"approved\": true|false,
  \"score\": 1-10,
  \"assessment\": \"Brief summary of your review\",
  \"concerns\": [
    {
      \"area\": \"security|quality|testing\",
      \"severity\": \"high|medium|low\",
      \"description\": \"Specific concern\",
      \"recommendation\": \"How to address it\"
    }
  ],
  \"blocking_issues\": [\"List of issues that MUST be fixed before proceeding\"],
  \"strengths\": [\"Positive aspects of the plan\"]
}

Be thorough but fair. Only mark as blocking if it's a genuine security risk.
"

Code Review (Phase 4)

cursor-agent --print --output-format json "
You are performing a security-focused code review of recently implemented changes.

Review the implementation for:
1. OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities
2. Injection flaws (SQL, NoSQL, OS command, LDAP)
3. Broken authentication/session management
4. Sensitive data exposure
5. XML external entities (XXE)
6. Broken access control
7. Security misconfiguration
8. Cross-site scripting (XSS)
9. Insecure deserialization
10. Using components with known vulnerabilities

Also check:
- Input validation on all external data
- Output encoding
- Error handling (no sensitive info leaked)
- Logging (security events captured)
- Test coverage for security scenarios

Return your assessment as JSON:
{
  \"agent\": \"cursor\",
  \"phase\": \"verification\",
  \"approved\": true|false,
  \"score\": 1-10,
  \"assessment\": \"Brief summary of code review\",
  \"issues\": [
    {
      \"file\": \"path/to/file.py\",
      \"line\": 42,
      \"severity\": \"critical|high|medium|low\",
      \"category\": \"OWASP category or quality issue\",
      \"description\": \"What's wrong\",
      \"recommendation\": \"How to fix it\"
    }
  ],
  \"blocking_issues\": [\"Critical security issues that MUST be fixed\"],
  \"passed_checks\": [\"Security checks that passed\"]
}

Be thorough. Security issues are blocking by default.
"

Outputs

• JSON review payload for validation or verification phases.

Output Parsing

Cursor returns JSON. Parse with:

import json
result = json.loads(cursor_output)
approved = result.get("approved", False)
score = result.get("score", 0)
blocking = result.get("blocking_issues", [])

Error Handling

Timeout

• Default timeout: 300 seconds
• On timeout: Retry once with 600 seconds
• If still fails: Log and continue with warning

Parse Error

• If output is not valid JSON: Extract any JSON block from output
• If no JSON found: Treat as failure, request human review

Agent Unavailable

• If cursor-agent not installed: Skip with warning
• Log to state.errors
• Continue workflow (Gemini alone is not sufficient for security)

Integration with Workflow

1. Phase 2 (Validation):

   • Run in parallel with Gemini
   • Store output in phase_outputs as cursor_feedback
   • Weight: 0.8 for security concerns

2. Phase 4 (Verification):

   • Run in parallel with Gemini
   • Store output in phase_outputs as cursor_review

Examples

cursor-agent --print --output-format json "Review the plan JSON provided in this prompt."

Related Skills

• /validate - Plan validation workflow
• /verify - Code review workflow
• /resolve-conflict - Merge Cursor and Gemini feedback
  • Must approve for workflow to complete

Approval Thresholds

Example Usage

# From project directory
cd projects/my-app

# Run validation
cursor-agent --print --output-format json "Review the plan JSON provided in this prompt for security..." > cursor-feedback.json

# Check result
cat cursor-feedback.json | jq '.approved, .score'

Conflict Resolution

When Cursor disagrees with Gemini:

Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.