Code Review
Skill Profile
(Select at least one profile to enable specific modules)
Overview
Code review is a systematic examination of source code intended to find bugs, improve code quality, enforce standards, and share knowledge across teams. Effective code reviews catch defects early, prevent technical debt accumulation, accelerate onboarding, and foster collaborative learning through constructive feedback.
Why This Matters
- Catches Bugs Early: Reviews identify issues before they reach production, reducing incident costs and user impact
- Improves Code Quality: Consistent feedback enforces coding standards, maintainability, and best practices
- Accelerates Onboarding: New team members learn codebase architecture and patterns through reviewing others' code
- Shares Knowledge: Reviews distribute knowledge about system design, implementation details, and architectural decisions
- Prevents Technical Debt: Identifying and addressing code issues early prevents debt accumulation
- Builds Team Culture: Regular, constructive feedback creates collaborative learning environment and improves code quality over time
Core Concepts & Rules
1. Core Principles
- Follow established patterns and conventions
- Maintain consistency across codebase
- Document decisions and trade-offs
2. Implementation Guidelines
- Start with the simplest viable solution
- Iterate based on feedback and requirements
- Test thoroughly before deployment
Inputs / Outputs / Contracts
- Inputs:
- Pull request with code changes
- PR description and context
- Related issues and documentation
- Code quality reports (lint, test coverage)
- Entry Conditions:
- PR is created and ready for review
- Code compiles and tests pass
- PR description is complete
- Outputs:
- Review comments and feedback
- Approval status
- Requested changes
- Action items for author
- Artifacts Required (Deliverables):
- Review comments
- Approval/rejection decision
- Updated PR if changes requested
- Acceptance Evidence:
- All reviewers have provided feedback
- Critical issues are addressed
- PR is approved or changes are requested
- Success Criteria:
- All critical issues are identified and addressed
- Code quality improves
- Knowledge is shared
- PR can be merged safely
Skill Composition
Quick Start / Implementation Example
- Review requirements and constraints
- Set up development environment
- Implement core functionality following patterns
- Write tests for critical paths
- Run tests and fix issues
- Document any deviations or decisions
# Example implementation following best practices
def example_function():
# Your implementation here
pass
Assumptions / Constraints / Non-goals
- Assumptions:
- Development environment is properly configured
- Required dependencies are available
- Team has basic understanding of domain
- Constraints:
- Must follow existing codebase conventions
- Time and resource limitations
- Compatibility requirements
- Non-goals:
- This skill does not cover edge cases outside scope
- Not a replacement for formal training
Compatibility & Prerequisites
- Supported Versions:
- Python 3.8+
- Node.js 16+
- Modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
- Required AI Tools:
- Code editor (VS Code recommended)
- Testing framework appropriate for language
- Version control (Git)
- Dependencies:
- Language-specific package manager
- Build tools
- Testing libraries
- Environment Setup:
.env.example keys: API_KEY, DATABASE_URL (no values)
Test Scenario Matrix (QA Strategy)
| Type |
Focus Area |
Required Scenarios / Mocks |
| Unit |
Core Logic |
Must cover primary logic and at least 3 edge/error cases. Target minimum 80% coverage |
| Integration |
DB / API |
All external API calls or database connections must be mocked during unit tests |
| E2E |
User Journey |
Critical user flows to test |
| Performance |
Latency / Load |
Benchmark requirements |
| Security |
Vuln / Auth |
SAST/DAST or dependency audit |
| Frontend |
UX / A11y |
Accessibility checklist (WCAG), Performance Budget (Lighthouse score) |
Technical Guardrails & Security Threat Model
1. Security & Privacy (Threat Model)
- Top Threats: Injection attacks, authentication bypass, data exposure
2. Performance & Resources
3. Architecture & Scalability
4. Observability & Reliability
Agent Directives & Error Recovery
(ข้อกำหนดสำหรับ AI Agent ในการคิดและแก้ปัญหาเมื่อเกิดข้อผิดพลาด)
- Thinking Process: Analyze root cause before fixing. Do not brute-force.
- Fallback Strategy: Stop after 3 failed test attempts. Output root cause and ask for human intervention/clarification.
- Self-Review: Check against Guardrails & Anti-patterns before finalizing.
- Output Constraints: Output ONLY the modified code block. Do not explain unless asked.
Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist
Anti-patterns / Pitfalls
- ⛔ Don't: Log PII, catch-all exception, N+1 queries
- ⚠️ Watch out for: Common symptoms and quick fixes
- 💡 Instead: Use proper error handling, pagination, and logging
Reference Links & Examples
- Internal documentation and examples
- Official documentation and best practices
- Community resources and discussions
Versioning & Changelog
- Version: 1.0.0
- Changelog:
- 2026-02-22: Initial version with complete template structure
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.
1---2name: code-review-2433description: Code review is a systematic examination of source code intended to find Use when this capability is needed.4---56# Code Review78## Skill Profile9*(Select at least one profile to enable specific modules)*10- [ ] **DevOps**11- [x] **Backend**12- [ ] **Frontend**13- [ ] **AI-RAG**14- [ ] **Security Critical**1516## Overview17Code review is a systematic examination of source code intended to find bugs, improve code quality, enforce standards, and share knowledge across teams. Effective code reviews catch defects early, prevent technical debt accumulation, accelerate onboarding, and foster collaborative learning through constructive feedback.1819## Why This Matters20- **Catches Bugs Early**: Reviews identify issues before they reach production, reducing incident costs and user impact21- **Improves Code Quality**: Consistent feedback enforces coding standards, maintainability, and best practices22- **Accelerates Onboarding**: New team members learn codebase architecture and patterns through reviewing others' code23- **Shares Knowledge**: Reviews distribute knowledge about system design, implementation details, and architectural decisions24- **Prevents Technical Debt**: Identifying and addressing code issues early prevents debt accumulation25- **Builds Team Culture**: Regular, constructive feedback creates collaborative learning environment and improves code quality over time2627---2829## Core Concepts & Rules3031### 1. Core Principles32- Follow established patterns and conventions33- Maintain consistency across codebase34- Document decisions and trade-offs3536### 2. Implementation Guidelines37- Start with the simplest viable solution38- Iterate based on feedback and requirements39- Test thoroughly before deployment404142## Inputs / Outputs / Contracts43* **Inputs**:44 - Pull request with code changes45 - PR description and context46 - Related issues and documentation47 - Code quality reports (lint, test coverage)48* **Entry Conditions**:49 - PR is created and ready for review50 - Code compiles and tests pass51 - PR description is complete52* **Outputs**:53 - Review comments and feedback54 - Approval status55 - Requested changes56 - Action items for author57* **Artifacts Required (Deliverables)**:58 - Review comments59 - Approval/rejection decision60 - Updated PR if changes requested61* **Acceptance Evidence**:62 - All reviewers have provided feedback63 - Critical issues are addressed64 - PR is approved or changes are requested65* **Success Criteria**:66 - All critical issues are identified and addressed67 - Code quality improves68 - Knowledge is shared69 - PR can be merged safely7071## Skill Composition72* **Depends on**: [technical-debt-management](../00-meta-skills/technical-debt-management/SKILL.md), [refactoring-strategies](../refactoring-strategies/SKILL.md)73* **Compatible with**: [api-design](../api-design/SKILL.md), [architectural-reviews](../00-meta-skills/architectural-reviews/SKILL.md)74* **Conflicts with**: None75* **Related Skills**: [python-standards](../python-standards/SKILL.md), [typescript-standards](../typescript-standards/SKILL.md), [git-workflow](../git-workflow/SKILL.md)7677---7879## Quick Start / Implementation Example80811. Review requirements and constraints822. Set up development environment833. Implement core functionality following patterns844. Write tests for critical paths855. Run tests and fix issues866. Document any deviations or decisions8788```python89# Example implementation following best practices90def example_function():91 # Your implementation here92 pass93```949596## Assumptions / Constraints / Non-goals9798* **Assumptions**:99 - Development environment is properly configured100 - Required dependencies are available101 - Team has basic understanding of domain102* **Constraints**:103 - Must follow existing codebase conventions104 - Time and resource limitations105 - Compatibility requirements106* **Non-goals**:107 - This skill does not cover edge cases outside scope108 - Not a replacement for formal training109110111## Compatibility & Prerequisites112113* **Supported Versions**:114 - Python 3.8+115 - Node.js 16+116 - Modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)117* **Required AI Tools**:118 - Code editor (VS Code recommended)119 - Testing framework appropriate for language120 - Version control (Git)121* **Dependencies**:122 - Language-specific package manager123 - Build tools124 - Testing libraries125* **Environment Setup**:126 - `.env.example` keys: `API_KEY`, `DATABASE_URL` (no values)127128129## Test Scenario Matrix (QA Strategy)130131| Type | Focus Area | Required Scenarios / Mocks |132| :--- | :--- | :--- |133| **Unit** | Core Logic | Must cover primary logic and at least 3 edge/error cases. Target minimum 80% coverage |134| **Integration** | DB / API | All external API calls or database connections must be mocked during unit tests |135| **E2E** | User Journey | Critical user flows to test |136| **Performance** | Latency / Load | Benchmark requirements |137| **Security** | Vuln / Auth | SAST/DAST or dependency audit |138| **Frontend** | UX / A11y | Accessibility checklist (WCAG), Performance Budget (Lighthouse score) |139140141## Technical Guardrails & Security Threat Model142143### 1. Security & Privacy (Threat Model)144* **Top Threats**: Injection attacks, authentication bypass, data exposure145- [ ] **Data Handling**: Sanitize all user inputs to prevent Injection attacks. Never log raw PII146- [ ] **Secrets Management**: No hardcoded API keys. Use Env Vars/Secrets Manager147- [ ] **Authorization**: Validate user permissions before state changes148149### 2. Performance & Resources150- [ ] **Execution Efficiency**: Consider time complexity for algorithms151- [ ] **Memory Management**: Use streams/pagination for large data152- [ ] **Resource Cleanup**: Close DB connections/file handlers in finally blocks153154### 3. Architecture & Scalability155- [ ] **Design Pattern**: Follow SOLID principles, use Dependency Injection156- [ ] **Modularity**: Decouple logic from UI/Frameworks157158### 4. Observability & Reliability159- [ ] **Logging Standards**: Structured JSON, include trace IDs `request_id`160- [ ] **Metrics**: Track `error_rate`, `latency`, `queue_depth`161- [ ] **Error Handling**: Standardized error codes, no bare except162- [ ] **Observability Artifacts**:163 - **Log Fields**: timestamp, level, message, request_id164 - **Metrics**: request_count, error_count, response_time165 - **Dashboards/Alerts**: High Error Rate > 5%166167168## Agent Directives & Error Recovery169*(ข้อกำหนดสำหรับ AI Agent ในการคิดและแก้ปัญหาเมื่อเกิดข้อผิดพลาด)*170171- **Thinking Process**: Analyze root cause before fixing. Do not brute-force.172- **Fallback Strategy**: Stop after 3 failed test attempts. Output root cause and ask for human intervention/clarification.173- **Self-Review**: Check against Guardrails & Anti-patterns before finalizing.174- **Output Constraints**: Output ONLY the modified code block. Do not explain unless asked.175176177## Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist178179- [ ] Tests passed + coverage met180- [ ] Lint/Typecheck passed181- [ ] Logging/Metrics/Trace implemented182- [ ] Security checks passed183- [ ] Documentation/Changelog updated184- [ ] Accessibility/Performance requirements met (if frontend)185186187## Anti-patterns / Pitfalls188189* ⛔ **Don't**: Log PII, catch-all exception, N+1 queries190* ⚠️ **Watch out for**: Common symptoms and quick fixes191* 💡 **Instead**: Use proper error handling, pagination, and logging192193194## Reference Links & Examples195196* Internal documentation and examples197* Official documentation and best practices198* Community resources and discussions199200201## Versioning & Changelog202203* **Version**: 1.0.0204* **Changelog**:205 - 2026-02-22: Initial version with complete template structure206207---208> Converted and distributed by [TomeVault](https://tomevault.io/claim/amnadtaowsoam) — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.209<!-- tomevault:4.0:skill_md:2026-04-13 -->