Code Review

Guidelines for reviewing Blade PRs — sanity checks, code quality, API decisions, usecase validity, and UI review. Use when this capability is needed.

tomevault-io Updated

File contents

Blade PR Code Review Guidelines

Use these guidelines to review a Blade PR. Apply each critique lens based on what the diff touches. No subagents — you perform the review directly.

Arguments

  • Identify PR_NUMBER from the PR link.

Critique Lenses

Load and apply whichever references are relevant (they are referenced relative to this skill file path):

  • PR Sanity — Always relevant. CI status, changeset coverage, docs, tests → pr-sanity-critique.md
  • API Decisions — Relevant for component changes. prop naming, component structure, design system consistency (apply when diff touches component files) → api-decision-critique.md

All issues raised by PR Sanity and API Decisions are critical and high importance issues. They take priority over any other code quality or other issues.


Source: razorpay/blade — distributed by TomeVault.

tomevault-io/skills-registry/tree/main/razorpay--blade--code-review commit 2bf8d5b00c

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add tomevault-io/code-review-39