Codebase Review

Codebase Review

Strategic read-only review of the codebase. Produce actionable findings. No fixes.

Inputs

Scope (domains or systems to focus on). Target branch (default main).

Review-aware

Before starting: check if <slug>.findings.md exists for this scope. If it does, build on prior findings rather than starting over.

Workflow

1. Load context — Read AGENTS.md for invariants and authoritative systems. Check GitHub activity (gh issue list --state open, gh pr list) to identify hotspots.

2. Sample strategically — Focus on:

   • Recent churn areas (from git log)
   • Systems flagged in open issues or PRs
   • Determinism violations (anything outside logistics_tick/combat_tick)
   • Duplicated systems or ambiguous authority
   • Autoload/UI coupling
   • Dead code or unreferenced assets
   • Test coverage gaps on critical paths

3. Report — Group findings by severity (Critical/Major/Minor) with path:line and impact description.

4. Track findings — For Critical and Major findings, create GitHub issues via /issue. For AIDE framework findings, use /issue with appropriate labels.

Reference

• Project invariants: AGENTS.md
• Coding patterns: docs/CODING_GUIDELINES.md
• Testing requirements: docs/TESTING_POLICY.md

Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.