tomevault-io Refactoring Complex Functions
When a function exceeds McCabe complexity limits (C901), extract helper functions that are pure and return values.
Quick Reference
| Principle | Pattern |
|---|---|
| Pure helpers | Extract functions that return values, never mutate inputs |
| No void mutators | NEVER create helpers that modify a collection and return None |
| Transform, don't mutate | result = transform(data) not mutate(data) |
| Comprehensions first | Prefer comprehensions over loops when building collections |
| Single return value | Each helper computes and returns one thing |
The Anti-Pattern: Void Mutator Functions
NEVER create helper functions that mutate a collection passed as an argument.
# INCORRECT - void mutator anti-pattern
def _add_user_fields(result: dict[str, Any], user: User) -> None:
"""Mutates result dict - THIS IS WRONG."""
result["name"] = user.name
result["email"] = user.email
result["role"] = user.role
def _add_metadata(result: dict[str, Any], metadata: Metadata) -> None:
"""Mutates result dict - THIS IS WRONG."""
result["created_at"] = metadata.created_at
result["version"] = metadata.version
def build_response(user: User, metadata: Metadata) -> dict[str, Any]:
result: dict[str, Any] = {}
_add_user_fields(result, user) # Side effect
_add_metadata(result, metadata) # Side effect
return result
Why this is wrong:
- Hidden side effects make code harder to reason about
- Can't compose or test helpers in isolation
- Violates command-query separation
- Makes the data flow invisible
The Correct Pattern: Pure Helpers That Return Values
# CORRECT - pure functions that return values
def _build_user_fields(user: User) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Return user fields as a dict."""
return {
"name": user.name,
"email": user.email,
"role": user.role,
}
def _build_metadata_fields(metadata: Metadata) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Return metadata fields as a dict."""
return {
"created_at": metadata.created_at,
"version": metadata.version,
}
def build_response(user: User, metadata: Metadata) -> dict[str, Any]:
return {
**_build_user_fields(user),
**_build_metadata_fields(metadata),
}
Refactoring Patterns
Pattern 1: Extract Computation
When a function has complex logic that computes a value, extract it.
# BEFORE - complex inline computation
def process_order(order: Order) -> Summary:
# ... lots of code ...
total = 0
for item in order.items:
price = item.unit_price * item.quantity
if item.discount:
price *= (1 - item.discount)
if order.member:
price *= 0.9
total += price
# ... more code ...
# AFTER - extracted pure helper
def _calculate_item_price(item: OrderItem, is_member: bool) -> Decimal:
"""Calculate final price for a single item."""
price = item.unit_price * item.quantity
if item.discount:
price *= (1 - item.discount)
if is_member:
price *= Decimal("0.9")
return price
def _calculate_order_total(order: Order) -> Decimal:
"""Calculate total price for all items."""
return sum(
_calculate_item_price(item, order.member)
for item in order.items
)
def process_order(order: Order) -> Summary:
# ... lots of code ...
total = _calculate_order_total(order)
# ... more code ...
Pattern 2: Extract Collection Building
When building a list or dict, extract the transformation logic.
# INCORRECT - void mutator for list building
def _add_valid_items(results: list[Item], items: list[Item]) -> None:
for item in items:
if item.is_valid and item.score > 0.5:
results.append(item)
# CORRECT - return the filtered list
def _filter_valid_items(items: list[Item]) -> list[Item]:
"""Return items that are valid with score > 0.5."""
return [item for item in items if item.is_valid and item.score > 0.5]
# Even better - use comprehension inline if simple enough
valid_items = [item for item in items if item.is_valid and item.score > 0.5]
Pattern 3: Extract Conditional Logic
When a function has complex branching, extract the decision or transformation.
# BEFORE - complex conditional
def format_value(value: Any, config: Config) -> str:
if isinstance(value, datetime):
if config.use_iso:
return value.isoformat()
else:
return value.strftime(config.date_format)
elif isinstance(value, Decimal):
if config.currency:
return f"${value:.2f}"
else:
return str(value)
# ... more cases ...
# AFTER - extracted formatters
def _format_datetime(value: datetime, config: Config) -> str:
"""Format datetime according to config."""
if config.use_iso:
return value.isoformat()
return value.strftime(config.date_format)
def _format_decimal(value: Decimal, config: Config) -> str:
"""Format decimal according to config."""
if config.currency:
return f"${value:.2f}"
return str(value)
def format_value(value: Any, config: Config) -> str:
if isinstance(value, datetime):
return _format_datetime(value, config)
if isinstance(value, Decimal):
return _format_decimal(value, config)
# ... more cases ...
Pattern 4: Extract Validation
When validation logic is complex, extract validators that return results.
# INCORRECT - validation that mutates error list
def _validate_email(user: User, errors: list[str]) -> None:
if not user.email:
errors.append("Email is required")
elif "@" not in user.email:
errors.append("Invalid email format")
# CORRECT - validation that returns errors
def _validate_email(email: str | None) -> list[str]:
"""Return list of validation errors for email (empty if valid)."""
if not email:
return ["Email is required"]
if "@" not in email:
return ["Invalid email format"]
return []
def validate_user(user: User) -> list[str]:
"""Return all validation errors for user."""
return [
*_validate_email(user.email),
*_validate_name(user.name),
*_validate_role(user.role),
]
Checklist When Extracting Helpers
Before creating a helper function during refactoring, verify:
- Does it return a value? (Not
Nonewith side effects) - Does it avoid mutating any input parameters?
- Can it be tested in isolation without setup?
- Does it have a single responsibility?
- Is the data flow visible at the call site?
If any answer is "no", redesign the helper.
Validation
Check complexity after refactoring via the validate-code skill:
uv run .claude/scripts/validate_code.py --lint <file>
The --lint flag runs ruff check, which includes C901 complexity checks. The refactored code should have no functions exceeding McCabe complexity of 5.
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.