Analyze Data Questions
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, please ask about available integrations.
Answer a data question, from a quick lookup to a full analysis to a formal report.
Usage
You can ask to analyze data with a natural language question (e.g., "Analyze the drop in conversion rate" or "How many users signed up last week?").
Workflow
1. Understand the Question
Parse the user's question and determine:
- Complexity level:
- Quick answer: Single metric, simple filter, factual lookup (e.g., "How many users signed up last week?")
- Full analysis: Multi-dimensional exploration, trend analysis, comparison (e.g., "What's driving the drop in conversion rate?")
- Formal report: Comprehensive investigation with methodology, caveats, and recommendations (e.g., "Prepare a quarterly business review of our subscription metrics")
- Data requirements: Which tables, metrics, dimensions, and time ranges are needed
- Output format: Number, table, chart, narrative, or combination
2. Gather Data
If a data warehouse is connected:
- Explore the schema to find relevant tables and columns
- Write SQL query(ies) to extract the needed data
- Execute the query and retrieve results
- If the query fails, debug and retry (check column names, table references, syntax for the specific dialect)
- If results look unexpected, run sanity checks before proceeding
If no data warehouse is connected:
- Ask the user to provide data in one of these ways:
- Paste query results directly
- Upload a CSV or Excel file
- Describe the schema so you can write queries for them to run
- If writing queries for manual execution, use the
data-write-query skill for dialect-specific best practices
- Once data is provided, proceed with analysis
3. Analyze
- Calculate relevant metrics, aggregations, and comparisons
- Identify patterns, trends, outliers, and anomalies
- Compare across dimensions (time periods, segments, categories)
- For complex analyses, break the problem into sub-questions and address each
4. Validate Before Presenting
Before sharing results, run through validation checks:
- Row count sanity: Does the number of records make sense?
- Null check: Are there unexpected nulls that could skew results?
- Magnitude check: Are the numbers in a reasonable range?
- Trend continuity: Do time series have unexpected gaps?
- Aggregation logic: Do subtotals sum to totals correctly?
If any check raises concerns, investigate and note caveats.
5. Present Findings
For quick answers:
- State the answer directly with relevant context
- Include the query used (collapsed or in a code block) for reproducibility
For full analyses:
- Lead with the key finding or insight
- Support with data tables and/or visualizations
- Note methodology and any caveats
- Suggest follow-up questions
For formal reports:
- Executive summary with key takeaways
- Methodology section explaining approach and data sources
- Detailed findings with supporting evidence
- Caveats, limitations, and data quality notes
- Recommendations and suggested next steps
6. Visualize Where Helpful
When a chart would communicate results more effectively than a table:
- Use the
data-create-viz skill to select the right chart type
- Generate a Python visualization or build it into an HTML dashboard
- Follow visualization best practices for clarity and accuracy
Tips
- Be specific about time ranges, segments, or metrics when possible
- If you know the table names, mention them to speed up the process
- For complex questions, the analysis may be broken into multiple queries
- Results are always validated before presentation -- if something looks off, it will be flagged
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.
1---2name: data-analyze3description: Answer data questions -- from quick lookups to full analyses Use when this capability is needed.4---56# Analyze Data Questions78> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, please ask about available integrations.910Answer a data question, from a quick lookup to a full analysis to a formal report.1112## Usage1314You can ask to analyze data with a natural language question (e.g., "Analyze the drop in conversion rate" or "How many users signed up last week?").1516### Workflow1718### 1. Understand the Question1920Parse the user's question and determine:2122- **Complexity level**:23 - **Quick answer**: Single metric, simple filter, factual lookup (e.g., "How many users signed up last week?")24 - **Full analysis**: Multi-dimensional exploration, trend analysis, comparison (e.g., "What's driving the drop in conversion rate?")25 - **Formal report**: Comprehensive investigation with methodology, caveats, and recommendations (e.g., "Prepare a quarterly business review of our subscription metrics")26- **Data requirements**: Which tables, metrics, dimensions, and time ranges are needed27- **Output format**: Number, table, chart, narrative, or combination2829### 2. Gather Data3031**If a data warehouse is connected:**32331. Explore the schema to find relevant tables and columns342. Write SQL query(ies) to extract the needed data353. Execute the query and retrieve results364. If the query fails, debug and retry (check column names, table references, syntax for the specific dialect)375. If results look unexpected, run sanity checks before proceeding3839**If no data warehouse is connected:**40411. Ask the user to provide data in one of these ways:42 - Paste query results directly43 - Upload a CSV or Excel file44 - Describe the schema so you can write queries for them to run452. If writing queries for manual execution, use the `data-write-query` skill for dialect-specific best practices463. Once data is provided, proceed with analysis4748### 3. Analyze4950- Calculate relevant metrics, aggregations, and comparisons51- Identify patterns, trends, outliers, and anomalies52- Compare across dimensions (time periods, segments, categories)53- For complex analyses, break the problem into sub-questions and address each5455### 4. Validate Before Presenting5657Before sharing results, run through validation checks:5859- **Row count sanity**: Does the number of records make sense?60- **Null check**: Are there unexpected nulls that could skew results?61- **Magnitude check**: Are the numbers in a reasonable range?62- **Trend continuity**: Do time series have unexpected gaps?63- **Aggregation logic**: Do subtotals sum to totals correctly?6465If any check raises concerns, investigate and note caveats.6667### 5. Present Findings6869**For quick answers:**7071- State the answer directly with relevant context72- Include the query used (collapsed or in a code block) for reproducibility7374**For full analyses:**7576- Lead with the key finding or insight77- Support with data tables and/or visualizations78- Note methodology and any caveats79- Suggest follow-up questions8081**For formal reports:**8283- Executive summary with key takeaways84- Methodology section explaining approach and data sources85- Detailed findings with supporting evidence86- Caveats, limitations, and data quality notes87- Recommendations and suggested next steps8889### 6. Visualize Where Helpful9091When a chart would communicate results more effectively than a table:9293- Use the `data-create-viz` skill to select the right chart type94- Generate a Python visualization or build it into an HTML dashboard95- Follow visualization best practices for clarity and accuracy9697## Tips9899- Be specific about time ranges, segments, or metrics when possible100- If you know the table names, mention them to speed up the process101- For complex questions, the analysis may be broken into multiple queries102- Results are always validated before presentation -- if something looks off, it will be flagged103104---105> Converted and distributed by [TomeVault](https://tomevault.io/claim/frumu-ai) — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.106<!-- tomevault:4.0:skill_md:2026-04-11 -->