Eml Check

eml-check — audit EML trees

Read ../_shared/eml-foundations.md for the operator, axioms, leaf alphabet, and branch convention.

When this skill triggers (and when it doesn't)

Triggers on: "verify this EML tree", "is this a valid witness for …", "check the proof-engine K=… tree", "audit the leaves of this compiled form", "does this really equal sqrt(x)?".

Does not trigger on: generic math verification, symbolic proof, or formula simplification. For "is this identity true?" on arbitrary elementary expressions (not EML trees), use /math-identity-check.

Subcommands

Both audit entry points share skills/_shared/eml_core/ and these exit codes: 0 verified / 1 mismatch / 2 shape-invalid / 3 usage.

How to run

All commands below assume cwd is the repo root. (Or drop the eml-skill/skills/eml-check/ prefix if you've cd'd into the skill directory.)

# full audit:
python eml-skill/skills/eml-check/scripts/audit.py --tree "eml(x, 1)" --claim exp --out-dir ./

# focused slices:
python eml-skill/skills/eml-check/scripts/check.py verify --tree "eml(x, 1)" --claim exp --out-dir ./
python eml-skill/skills/eml-check/scripts/check.py leaves --tree "eml(x, 1)"                        # shape only
python eml-skill/skills/eml-check/scripts/check.py branch-audit --tree "eml(1, eml(eml(1, x), 1))" \
    --claim ln                                                                                       # probes only

# exhaustive minimality:
python eml-skill/skills/eml-check/scripts/minimality.py audit-minimality --target exp --max-k 7
python eml-skill/skills/eml-check/scripts/minimality.py audit-minimality --tree "eml(x, 1)" --max-k 5

Flags:

• --tree STR — nested eml(x, 1), RPN x 1 E / x1E, or JSON AST.
• --claim NAME — one of exp, ln, log10, sqrt, sin, cos, tan, asin, acos, atan, neg, inv, add, sub, mult, div, pow, e, pi, i. Ad-hoc formulas: use /eml-optimize equiv.
• --tolerance FLOAT (default 1e-10) · --domain NAME (default auto; named: positive-reals, real-interval, complex-box, unit-disk-interior, right-half-plane) · --samples INT (70) · --seed INT (0).

Don't reimplement. The evaluator lives in eml_core and is tested at all three axioms plus parser edges. If you're writing a cmath evaluator inline, stop and use audit.py.

Output shape

Report fields: schema_version, verdict (verified / verified-with-caveats / numerical-mismatch / shape-invalid), tree, claim, shape (K, depth, leaves), numerical (domain, samples, tolerance, max_abs_diff), branch_flags, caveats, worst_cases. Full schema in references/audit-schema.md.

Gotchas

• Never use math.log / math.exp. The evaluator uses cmath.log (principal branch); a real-only evaluator silently mis-handles negative reals.
• Interior sampling avoids boundaries. Mult K=17 has a removable singularity at xy = 0; the sampler stays strictly inside. Branch-cut behavior is probed separately.
• "Verified" ≠ "proven." Report says "agrees to N samples within tolerance T." For a shorter-tree search or symbolic gate, use /eml-optimize.
• Default tol 1e-10. Proof-engine primitives land near 1e-14; raise for deeply nested witnesses.
• Tree references y but claim is unary. Audit pins y = 1+0j, samples only x, records a caveat — does not crash.
• minimality.py at K ≥ 15 is CPU-heavy (tens of seconds). It ships gated behind EML_SLOW=1 in CI; budget accordingly when running locally.

Test scenarios

1. --tree "eml(x, 1)" --claim exp → verified, K=3, max_abs_diff ≈ 0.
2. --tree "eml(1, eml(eml(1, x), 1))" --claim ln → verified, K=7, branch_flags populated on neg real axis.
3. --tree "eml(x, 1)" --claim ln → numerical-mismatch with worst_cases (exit 1).
4. --tree "eml(2, x)" → shape-invalid with parse-error caveat (exit 2).

Non-goals

• No formula compilation (/eml-lab), no shorter-tree search (/eml-optimize), no symbolic simplification — report is purely numerical.

Source: yaniv-golan/eml-skill — distributed by TomeVault.