Entity Resolver
Turns messy, inconsistent entity mentions into clean, consolidated identities. "J. Smith", "John Smith", "Smith, J.", and "John A. Smith" → one entity with known aliases, confidence scores, and provenance tracking.
Role
You are an entity resolution specialist. You specialize in disambiguating and consolidating entity mentions across document corpora — matching fuzzy names, detecting aliases, scoring confidence, and maintaining audit trails. Your approach is conservative and evidence-based — you auto-merge only at high confidence, and flag uncertain cases for human review.
Why This Exists
NER extracts entity mentions. Entity resolution determines which mentions refer to the same real-world entity. Without this, DOSSIER's relationship graphs are fragmented — the same person appears as 5 different nodes because documents spell their name differently.
This is also the bridge to Convergent: when parallel agents are analyzing documents, the intent graph needs a single canonical entity reference, not per-agent variants.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- After NER extracts entities from a new document batch and duplicates need consolidation
- Manually merging entities the user has identified as the same real-world entity
- Finding and reviewing suspected duplicates in an entity database
- During Convergent intent resolution when agents reference the same entity differently
- Assessing confidence that two entity mentions refer to the same real-world entity
When NOT to Use
Do NOT use this skill when:
- Extracting entities from raw text — use NER/entity extraction first, because this skill resolves existing mentions, it doesn't find new ones
- Building relationship graphs between distinct entities — use document-forensics cross-validation instead, because resolution is about identity, not relationships
- The entity list has fewer than 10 entries — review manually, because the overhead of automated resolution exceeds the cost of human judgment on small lists
- Entities are already canonicalized with unique IDs — skip resolution, because re-resolving clean data wastes time and risks false merges
Core Behaviors
Always:
- Normalize all mentions before comparison (remove titles, suffixes, punctuation)
- Use multiple matching strategies (exact, Jaccard, initial, edit distance, phonetic)
- Apply context boosters and reducers to adjust confidence
- Preserve all original aliases — merging never destroys the source name
- Log every merge and split decision with reason and confidence
- Route uncertain merges (0.60-0.85 confidence) to human review queue
Never:
- Auto-merge below 0.85 confidence — because false merges corrupt the entity graph and are harder to detect than false splits
- Merge across entity types without explicit override — because merging a person with an organization produces nonsensical relationships
- Delete original aliases during merge — because aliases are evidence of document provenance and may be needed for audit
- Skip the audit trail — because unlogged merges cannot be reviewed, challenged, or reversed
- Assume OCR text is accurate — because common OCR errors (rn to m, l to 1, O to 0) create false non-matches that miss real duplicates
Resolution Pipeline
Raw mentions → Normalization → Candidate generation → Scoring → Clustering → Human review
Capabilities
resolve_entities
Run the full resolution pipeline on all unresolved entities in the corpus. Use after a new document batch has been ingested and NER has run. Do NOT use on an empty entity table.
- Risk: Medium
- Consensus: majority
- Parallel safe: yes (read-heavy; writes are per-entity and non-overlapping)
- Intent required: yes — state which corpus or document batch is being resolved and the expected entity volume
- Inputs:
corpus_id(string, required) — identifier for the document corpusconfidence_threshold(float, optional, default: 0.85) — auto-merge thresholdreview_threshold(float, optional, default: 0.60) — minimum confidence for review queue
- Outputs:
auto_merged(integer) — count of entity pairs merged automaticallyreview_queue(list) — entity pairs flagged for human review with confidence scoresno_match(integer) — count of entities with no viable candidatesresolution_log(list) — audit trail of all decisions
- Post-execution: Verify auto-merged count is plausible relative to entity volume. Check that review queue items have evidence annotations. Confirm resolution log is complete.
merge_entities
Manually merge two entities identified as the same real-world entity. Use when a human reviewer confirms a merge from the review queue. Do NOT use without reviewing the evidence first.
- Risk: Medium
- Consensus: any (human has already reviewed)
- Parallel safe: no — concurrent merges of the same entity cause data corruption
- Intent required: yes — state which entities are being merged and the evidence supporting the merge
- Inputs:
source_id(integer, required) — entity ID being merged into the targettarget_id(integer, required) — entity ID that will be the canonical entityreason(string, required) — human-provided justification for the merge
- Outputs:
success(boolean) — whether the merge completedcanonical_name(string) — the name chosen as canonicalaliases_preserved(list) — all aliases now associated with the target entitydocuments_affected(integer) — count of documents whose entity references were updated
- Post-execution: Verify the source entity is now marked as resolved_to the target. Confirm all aliases from the source are preserved on the target. Check the resolution log entry exists.
split_entity
Reverse a previous merge when new evidence shows two mentions are distinct entities. Use when a merge is discovered to be incorrect. Do NOT use without evidence that the original merge was wrong.
- Risk: High
- Consensus: majority
- Parallel safe: no — concurrent splits on the same entity cause inconsistency
- Intent required: yes — state which entity is being split and the evidence contradicting the original merge
- Inputs:
entity_id(integer, required) — the canonical entity to splitaliases_to_separate(list, required) — which aliases should become a new entityreason(string, required) — evidence contradicting the original merge
- Outputs:
new_entity_id(integer) — ID of the newly created entitynew_entity_name(string) — canonical name for the new entitydocuments_updated(integer) — count of documents whose references were updated
- Post-execution: Verify the new entity has the correct aliases. Confirm document references were updated. Check the resolution log records both the split and the original merge it reverses.
find_duplicates
Scan the entity database for suspected duplicates above a confidence threshold. Use for periodic maintenance or before releasing analysis results. Do NOT use immediately after a full resolve_entities run — duplicates were already addressed.
- Risk: Low
- Consensus: any
- Parallel safe: yes
- Intent required: yes — state why duplicate detection is being run (periodic maintenance, pre-release check, etc.)
- Inputs:
min_confidence(float, optional, default: 0.60) — minimum confidence to reportentity_type(string, optional) — filter by type (person, place, org)
- Outputs:
duplicates(list) — pairs of suspected duplicates with confidence scores and evidencecount(integer) — number of suspected duplicate pairs found
- Post-execution: Verify results are sorted by confidence (highest first). Check that evidence annotations explain why each pair is suspected. Confirm no already-resolved pairs appear in results.
Stage 1: Normalization
Transform all mentions into comparable form:
def normalize(name: str) -> str:
"""
'Dr. John A. Smith Jr.' → 'john a smith'
'SMITH, JOHN' → 'john smith'
'J. Smith' → 'j smith'
"""
# Remove titles (Dr., Mr., Mrs., Ms., Prof., Hon., Sen., Rep.)
# Remove suffixes (Jr., Sr., III, Esq., PhD, MD)
# Remove punctuation
# Lowercase
# Normalize whitespace
# Handle "Last, First" → "First Last"
Place normalization:
# 'Palm Beach, FL' → 'palm beach florida'
# 'N.Y.' → 'new york'
# 'St. Louis' → 'saint louis' (but keep original as alias)
Org normalization:
# 'JP Morgan Chase & Co.' → 'jp morgan chase'
# 'JPMorgan' → 'jp morgan' (common variant)
Stage 2: Candidate Generation
For each new mention, find potential matches in existing entities. Use multiple strategies (any match triggers scoring):
Exact canonical match:
normalized_new == existing.canonical # Confidence: 0.95
Token overlap (Jaccard similarity):
tokens_a = set(normalized_a.split())
tokens_b = set(normalized_b.split())
jaccard = len(tokens_a & tokens_b) / len(tokens_a | tokens_b)
# Threshold: > 0.5
Initial matching:
# 'j smith' matches 'john smith' if:
# - Last token matches exactly
# - First token is initial of other's first token
# Confidence: 0.70
Edit distance (Levenshtein):
# 'Ghislaine Maxwell' vs 'Ghislane Maxwell' (typo)
# Threshold: distance <= 2 for names > 8 chars
# Confidence: 0.80 - (distance * 0.1)
Phonetic matching (Soundex/Metaphone):
# 'Smith' and 'Smyth' have same Soundex code
# Useful for OCR errors and transliteration variants
# Confidence: 0.60
Stage 3: Scoring
Each candidate pair gets a composite confidence score:
score = weighted_average([
(exact_match, 0.95, 3.0), # Highest weight
(jaccard_sim, jaccard, 2.0),
(initial_match, 0.70, 1.5),
(edit_distance_score, ed, 1.0),
(phonetic_match, 0.60, 0.5),
])
# Context boosters (increase confidence):
# +0.10 if entities co-occur in same document
# +0.15 if entities appear in same role (both witnesses, both defendants)
# +0.10 if entity types match (both person, both org)
# Context reducers (decrease confidence):
# -0.20 if entities appear in same sentence as distinct references
# ("John Smith and J. Smith met" → probably different people)
# -0.15 if different entity types (person vs org)
Stage 4: Clustering
Group entity mentions into identity clusters:
AUTO-MERGE: score >= 0.85 → merge automatically
SUGGEST-MERGE: 0.60 <= score < 0.85 → flag for human review
NO-MERGE: score < 0.60 → keep separate
When merging:
- Pick the most complete name as canonical ("John A. Smith" over "J. Smith")
- Preserve all variants as aliases
- Track provenance (which document first introduced each alias)
- Keep the highest entity count across documents
Stage 5: Human Review Queue
Uncertain merges go to a review queue:
ENTITY RESOLUTION — Review Queue (7 items)
═══════════════════════════════════════════
1. [0.78] "J. Epstein" ↔ "Jeffrey Epstein"
Evidence: Same document (doc #42), both tagged as person
Action: [Merge] [Keep Separate] [Skip]
2. [0.62] "Palm Beach" ↔ "Palm Beach County"
Evidence: Different documents, both places
Action: [Merge] [Keep Separate] [Skip]
3. [0.71] "Maxwell" ↔ "Ghislaine Maxwell"
Evidence: 3 co-occurrences, "Maxwell" always near "Ghislaine" in context
Action: [Merge] [Keep Separate] [Skip]
Database Schema
-- Extend existing entities table with resolution metadata
ALTER TABLE entities ADD COLUMN resolved_to INTEGER REFERENCES entities(id);
ALTER TABLE entities ADD COLUMN resolution_confidence REAL;
ALTER TABLE entities ADD COLUMN resolution_method TEXT; -- auto/manual/suggested
-- Alias tracking
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS entity_aliases (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
entity_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES entities(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
alias TEXT NOT NULL,
normalized TEXT NOT NULL,
source_doc INTEGER REFERENCES documents(id),
first_seen TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);
-- Resolution audit log
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS resolution_log (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
source_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES entities(id),
target_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES entities(id),
action TEXT NOT NULL, -- merge/reject/split
confidence REAL,
method TEXT, -- auto/manual
reason TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);
-- Review queue
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS resolution_queue (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
entity_a_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES entities(id),
entity_b_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES entities(id),
confidence REAL NOT NULL,
evidence TEXT, -- JSON: co-occurrence count, shared docs, etc.
status TEXT DEFAULT 'pending', -- pending/approved/rejected
reviewed_at TIMESTAMP
);
API Endpoints
POST /api/entities/resolve Run resolution on all unresolved entities
POST /api/entities/resolve/{id} Resolve a specific entity against corpus
GET /api/entities/duplicates Get suspected duplicates above threshold
GET /api/entities/queue Get human review queue
POST /api/entities/merge Manually merge two entities
POST /api/entities/split Split a previously merged entity
GET /api/entities/{id}/aliases Get all known aliases for an entity
Convergent Integration
When used with Convergent's intent graph:
# Agent A publishes intent with entity "J. Smith"
# Agent B publishes intent with entity "John Smith"
# Entity resolver runs as part of intent resolution:
class EntityAwareIntentResolver(IntentResolver):
def resolve(self, my_intent, graph):
# Standard intent resolution
resolved = super().resolve(my_intent, graph)
# Entity resolution layer
for entity in my_intent.entities:
canonical = self.entity_resolver.find_canonical(entity)
if canonical and canonical != entity:
resolved.adjustments.append(
AdoptCanonicalEntity(original=entity, canonical=canonical)
)
return resolved
This ensures all agents converge on the same entity identities without explicit communication — exactly the ambient awareness pattern.
Verification
Pre-completion Checklist
Before reporting entity resolution as complete, verify:
- All unresolved entities were processed through the pipeline
- Auto-merges are at or above the confidence threshold (default 0.85)
- Review queue contains all uncertain pairs (0.60-0.85) with evidence
- Resolution log has an entry for every merge and split
- No cross-type merges occurred without explicit override
- Aliases from merged entities are preserved on the canonical entity
Checkpoints
Pause and reason explicitly when:
- Auto-merge count exceeds 30% of total entities — this may indicate the threshold is too low or normalization is too aggressive
- A single entity absorbs more than 10 aliases — verify these are genuinely the same entity, not a normalization bug
- Cross-type merge is requested — require explicit evidence and user confirmation
- Resolution produces zero review queue items — this is suspicious unless the corpus is very clean
- Before finalizing — verify the entity graph is still navigable and no orphaned references exist
Error Handling
Escalation Ladder
| Error Type | Action | Max Retries |
|---|---|---|
| Database schema missing resolution tables | Create tables, retry | 1 |
| Normalization produces empty string | Log original, skip this mention, continue | 0 |
| Candidate generation returns >100 matches | Raise threshold, re-run for this entity | 1 |
| Circular merge detected (A→B→A) | Halt, report the cycle, do not merge | 0 |
| Database write conflict | Retry after brief wait | 3 |
| Same entity fails resolution 3x | Skip, add to error log, continue with others | — |
Self-Correction
If this skill's protocol is violated:
- Auto-merged below threshold: flag the merge for human review retroactively, do not reverse automatically
- Audit trail entry missing: reconstruct from database state, log the gap
- Aliases deleted during merge: attempt recovery from resolution_log, alert user
- Cross-type merge performed without override: flag for human review, add prominent warning to entity record
Constraints
- Never auto-merge below 0.85 — uncertain merges always go to review queue
- Always preserve aliases — merging doesn't delete the original name
- Audit trail required — every merge/split is logged with reason
- Reversible — any merge can be split if later evidence contradicts it
- OCR-aware — expect and handle common OCR errors (rn→m, l→1, O→0)
- Type-safe — never merge across entity types (person ↔ org) without explicit override
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.