Failure Modes
Skill Profile
(Select at least one profile to enable specific modules)
Overview
Failure Modes Analysis is a systematic approach to identifying, categorizing, and mitigating potential failures in distributed systems. This skill teaches you how to anticipate system failures, understand their impact, and design resilient systems that gracefully handle various failure scenarios.
Core Principle: "Understand what can fail, so you can prevent it or handle it gracefully."
Why This Matters
- Proactive Risk Management: Identify failures before they occur in production
- Better Architecture: Design systems that handle failures gracefully from the start
- Faster Incident Response: Pre-documented failure modes speed up root cause analysis
- Improved Reliability: Systematic approach reduces blind spots and assumptions
Core Concepts & Rules
1. Core Principles
- Follow established patterns and conventions
- Maintain consistency across codebase
- Document decisions and trade-offs
2. Implementation Guidelines
- Start with the simplest viable solution
- Iterate based on feedback and requirements
- Test thoroughly before deployment
Inputs / Outputs / Contracts
- Inputs:
- System architecture documentation
- Component dependencies and relationships
- Historical incident data
- Performance metrics and baselines
- Entry Conditions:
- System architecture is documented
- Component boundaries are clearly defined
- Monitoring and observability are in place
- Outputs:
- Failure mode documentation (FMEA)
- Risk priority matrix
- Mitigation strategies for each failure mode
- Artifacts Required (Deliverables):
- FMEA spreadsheet with RPN calculations
- Failure mode documentation for each component
- Risk register with prioritized action items
- Acceptance Evidence:
- Completed FMEA with all components analyzed
- Risk register with mitigation owners
- Test coverage for failure scenarios
- Success Criteria:
- All critical components have documented failure modes
- High-risk failure modes (RPN > 100) have mitigation plans
- Team has reviewed and validated the analysis
Skill Composition
- Depends on: System Architecture, Monitoring & Observability
- Compatible with: Chaos Engineering, Postmortem Analysis, Resilience Patterns
- Conflicts with: Systems without clear component boundaries
- Related Skills:
- 40-system-resilience/chaos-engineering - Proactive failure testing
- 40-system-resilience/postmortem-analysis - Learning from incidents
- 40-system-resilience/bulkhead-patterns - Failure containment
- 40-system-resilience/retry-timeout-strategies - Handling transient failures
Quick Start / Implementation Example
- Review requirements and constraints
- Set up development environment
- Implement core functionality following patterns
- Write tests for critical paths
- Run tests and fix issues
- Document any deviations or decisions
# Example implementation following best practices
def example_function():
# Your implementation here
pass
Assumptions / Constraints / Non-goals
- Assumptions:
- Development environment is properly configured
- Required dependencies are available
- Team has basic understanding of domain
- Constraints:
- Must follow existing codebase conventions
- Time and resource limitations
- Compatibility requirements
- Non-goals:
- This skill does not cover edge cases outside scope
- Not a replacement for formal training
Compatibility & Prerequisites
- Supported Versions:
- Python 3.8+
- Node.js 16+
- Modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
- Required AI Tools:
- Code editor (VS Code recommended)
- Testing framework appropriate for language
- Version control (Git)
- Dependencies:
- Language-specific package manager
- Build tools
- Testing libraries
- Environment Setup:
.env.example keys: API_KEY, DATABASE_URL (no values)
Test Scenario Matrix (QA Strategy)
| Type |
Focus Area |
Required Scenarios / Mocks |
| Unit |
Core Logic |
Must cover primary logic and at least 3 edge/error cases. Target minimum 80% coverage |
| Integration |
DB / API |
All external API calls or database connections must be mocked during unit tests |
| E2E |
User Journey |
Critical user flows to test |
| Performance |
Latency / Load |
Benchmark requirements |
| Security |
Vuln / Auth |
SAST/DAST or dependency audit |
| Frontend |
UX / A11y |
Accessibility checklist (WCAG), Performance Budget (Lighthouse score) |
Technical Guardrails & Security Threat Model
1. Security & Privacy (Threat Model)
- Top Threats: Injection attacks, authentication bypass, data exposure
2. Performance & Resources
3. Architecture & Scalability
4. Observability & Reliability
Agent Directives & Error Recovery
(ข้อกำหนดสำหรับ AI Agent ในการคิดและแก้ปัญหาเมื่อเกิดข้อผิดพลาด)
- Thinking Process: Analyze root cause before fixing. Do not brute-force.
- Fallback Strategy: Stop after 3 failed test attempts. Output root cause and ask for human intervention/clarification.
- Self-Review: Check against Guardrails & Anti-patterns before finalizing.
- Output Constraints: Output ONLY the modified code block. Do not explain unless asked.
Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist
Anti-patterns / Pitfalls
- ⛔ Don't: Log PII, catch-all exception, N+1 queries
- ⚠️ Watch out for: Common symptoms and quick fixes
- 💡 Instead: Use proper error handling, pagination, and logging
Reference Links & Examples
- Internal documentation and examples
- Official documentation and best practices
- Community resources and discussions
Versioning & Changelog
- Version: 1.0.0
- Changelog:
- 2026-02-22: Initial version with complete template structure
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.
1---2name: failure-modes3description: Failure Modes Analysis is a systematic approach to identifying, categorizing, Use when this capability is needed.4---56# Failure Modes78## Skill Profile9*(Select at least one profile to enable specific modules)*10- [ ] **DevOps**11- [x] **Backend**12- [ ] **Frontend**13- [ ] **AI-RAG**14- [ ] **Security Critical**1516## Overview17Failure Modes Analysis is a systematic approach to identifying, categorizing, and mitigating potential failures in distributed systems. This skill teaches you how to anticipate system failures, understand their impact, and design resilient systems that gracefully handle various failure scenarios.1819**Core Principle**: "Understand what can fail, so you can prevent it or handle it gracefully."2021## Why This Matters22- **Proactive Risk Management**: Identify failures before they occur in production23- **Better Architecture**: Design systems that handle failures gracefully from the start24- **Faster Incident Response**: Pre-documented failure modes speed up root cause analysis25- **Improved Reliability**: Systematic approach reduces blind spots and assumptions2627---2829## Core Concepts & Rules3031### 1. Core Principles32- Follow established patterns and conventions33- Maintain consistency across codebase34- Document decisions and trade-offs3536### 2. Implementation Guidelines37- Start with the simplest viable solution38- Iterate based on feedback and requirements39- Test thoroughly before deployment404142## Inputs / Outputs / Contracts43* **Inputs**:44 - System architecture documentation45 - Component dependencies and relationships46 - Historical incident data47 - Performance metrics and baselines48* **Entry Conditions**:49 - System architecture is documented50 - Component boundaries are clearly defined51 - Monitoring and observability are in place52* **Outputs**:53 - Failure mode documentation (FMEA)54 - Risk priority matrix55 - Mitigation strategies for each failure mode56* **Artifacts Required (Deliverables)**:57 - FMEA spreadsheet with RPN calculations58 - Failure mode documentation for each component59 - Risk register with prioritized action items60* **Acceptance Evidence**:61 - Completed FMEA with all components analyzed62 - Risk register with mitigation owners63 - Test coverage for failure scenarios64* **Success Criteria**:65 - All critical components have documented failure modes66 - High-risk failure modes (RPN > 100) have mitigation plans67 - Team has reviewed and validated the analysis6869## Skill Composition70* **Depends on**: System Architecture, Monitoring & Observability71* **Compatible with**: Chaos Engineering, Postmortem Analysis, Resilience Patterns72* **Conflicts with**: Systems without clear component boundaries73* **Related Skills**: 74 - [40-system-resilience/chaos-engineering](40-system-resilience/chaos-engineering/SKILL.md) - Proactive failure testing75 - [40-system-resilience/postmortem-analysis](40-system-resilience/postmortem-analysis/SKILL.md) - Learning from incidents76 - [40-system-resilience/bulkhead-patterns](40-system-resilience/bulkhead-patterns/SKILL.md) - Failure containment77 - [40-system-resilience/retry-timeout-strategies](40-system-resilience/retry-timeout-strategies/SKILL.md) - Handling transient failures7879---8081## Quick Start / Implementation Example82831. Review requirements and constraints842. Set up development environment853. Implement core functionality following patterns864. Write tests for critical paths875. Run tests and fix issues886. Document any deviations or decisions8990```python91# Example implementation following best practices92def example_function():93 # Your implementation here94 pass95```969798## Assumptions / Constraints / Non-goals99100* **Assumptions**:101 - Development environment is properly configured102 - Required dependencies are available103 - Team has basic understanding of domain104* **Constraints**:105 - Must follow existing codebase conventions106 - Time and resource limitations107 - Compatibility requirements108* **Non-goals**:109 - This skill does not cover edge cases outside scope110 - Not a replacement for formal training111112113## Compatibility & Prerequisites114115* **Supported Versions**:116 - Python 3.8+117 - Node.js 16+118 - Modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)119* **Required AI Tools**:120 - Code editor (VS Code recommended)121 - Testing framework appropriate for language122 - Version control (Git)123* **Dependencies**:124 - Language-specific package manager125 - Build tools126 - Testing libraries127* **Environment Setup**:128 - `.env.example` keys: `API_KEY`, `DATABASE_URL` (no values)129130131## Test Scenario Matrix (QA Strategy)132133| Type | Focus Area | Required Scenarios / Mocks |134| :--- | :--- | :--- |135| **Unit** | Core Logic | Must cover primary logic and at least 3 edge/error cases. Target minimum 80% coverage |136| **Integration** | DB / API | All external API calls or database connections must be mocked during unit tests |137| **E2E** | User Journey | Critical user flows to test |138| **Performance** | Latency / Load | Benchmark requirements |139| **Security** | Vuln / Auth | SAST/DAST or dependency audit |140| **Frontend** | UX / A11y | Accessibility checklist (WCAG), Performance Budget (Lighthouse score) |141142143## Technical Guardrails & Security Threat Model144145### 1. Security & Privacy (Threat Model)146* **Top Threats**: Injection attacks, authentication bypass, data exposure147- [ ] **Data Handling**: Sanitize all user inputs to prevent Injection attacks. Never log raw PII148- [ ] **Secrets Management**: No hardcoded API keys. Use Env Vars/Secrets Manager149- [ ] **Authorization**: Validate user permissions before state changes150151### 2. Performance & Resources152- [ ] **Execution Efficiency**: Consider time complexity for algorithms153- [ ] **Memory Management**: Use streams/pagination for large data154- [ ] **Resource Cleanup**: Close DB connections/file handlers in finally blocks155156### 3. Architecture & Scalability157- [ ] **Design Pattern**: Follow SOLID principles, use Dependency Injection158- [ ] **Modularity**: Decouple logic from UI/Frameworks159160### 4. Observability & Reliability161- [ ] **Logging Standards**: Structured JSON, include trace IDs `request_id`162- [ ] **Metrics**: Track `error_rate`, `latency`, `queue_depth`163- [ ] **Error Handling**: Standardized error codes, no bare except164- [ ] **Observability Artifacts**:165 - **Log Fields**: timestamp, level, message, request_id166 - **Metrics**: request_count, error_count, response_time167 - **Dashboards/Alerts**: High Error Rate > 5%168169170## Agent Directives & Error Recovery171*(ข้อกำหนดสำหรับ AI Agent ในการคิดและแก้ปัญหาเมื่อเกิดข้อผิดพลาด)*172173- **Thinking Process**: Analyze root cause before fixing. Do not brute-force.174- **Fallback Strategy**: Stop after 3 failed test attempts. Output root cause and ask for human intervention/clarification.175- **Self-Review**: Check against Guardrails & Anti-patterns before finalizing.176- **Output Constraints**: Output ONLY the modified code block. Do not explain unless asked.177178179## Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist180181- [ ] Tests passed + coverage met182- [ ] Lint/Typecheck passed183- [ ] Logging/Metrics/Trace implemented184- [ ] Security checks passed185- [ ] Documentation/Changelog updated186- [ ] Accessibility/Performance requirements met (if frontend)187188189## Anti-patterns / Pitfalls190191* ⛔ **Don't**: Log PII, catch-all exception, N+1 queries192* ⚠️ **Watch out for**: Common symptoms and quick fixes193* 💡 **Instead**: Use proper error handling, pagination, and logging194195196## Reference Links & Examples197198* Internal documentation and examples199* Official documentation and best practices200* Community resources and discussions201202203## Versioning & Changelog204205* **Version**: 1.0.0206* **Changelog**:207 - 2026-02-22: Initial version with complete template structure208209---210> Converted and distributed by [TomeVault](https://tomevault.io/claim/amnadtaowsoam) — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.211<!-- tomevault:4.0:skill_md:2026-04-13 -->