Florianbuetow Claude Code Linddun

LINDDUN Privacy Threat Dispatcher

Dispatch parallel subagents covering all 7 LINDDUN privacy threat categories. Each category runs as an independent subagent analyzing the scoped code for that class of privacy threat. LINDDUN fills the gap that security frameworks like STRIDE and OWASP leave: a system can be fully secure (encrypted, authenticated, authorized) and still violate user privacy. LINDDUN systematically identifies these privacy-specific threats.

Supported Flags

Read ../../shared/schemas/flags.md for the full flag specification. This dispatcher supports all cross-cutting flags.

Framework Reference

Read ../../shared/frameworks/linddun.md for the full LINDDUN framework specification including threat descriptions, code-level indicators, regulatory mappings (GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA), per-element applicability matrix, and cross-framework mappings to STRIDE/OWASP/CWE.

Pre-flight Relevance Check

Before dispatching subagents, scan the scoped file list to determine which categories are relevant. Unlike STRIDE (where all categories usually apply), LINDDUN relevance depends heavily on whether the codebase handles personal data.

First, confirm the codebase handles personal data. If there is no PII, no user accounts, no analytics, and no data collection, LINDDUN analysis is not applicable. Report this and exit.

How to check: Use Grep on the scoped files to detect:

• PII patterns: email, phone, ssn, address, birthdate, name
• User data: user_id, profile, account, preferences
• Analytics: analytics, tracking, telemetry, pixel, gtag
• Third-party: stripe, segment, mixpanel, google-analytics, facebook
• Consent: consent, gdpr, ccpa, cookie, opt-in, opt-out
• Data export: export, download, portability

If --only is specified, skip the relevance check and dispatch only the listed categories.

Dispatch Category Subagents

CRITICAL: All Task tool calls MUST appear in the SAME response message. This is what triggers parallel execution. If you emit them across separate messages, they run sequentially and waste time.

Dispatch Table

Subagent Prompt Template

Each subagent Task call must include a FULLY self-contained prompt. Subagents get their own isolated context window and cannot see the main conversation.

Each subagent prompt must contain:

1. The concrete file list to analyze (resolved from scope, filtered for relevance).
2. The absolute path to the category SKILL.md to read and follow.
3. The flags to apply (--scope, --depth, --severity, --format, etc.).
4. The findings schema path (shared/schemas/findings.md) for output format.
5. An instruction to return findings only -- no summary, no cross-category commentary. The dispatcher handles consolidation.

Analyze the following files for LINDDUN {LETTER} ({CATEGORY_NAME}) privacy threats:

FILES:
{FILE_LIST}

STEP 1: Read the skill definition at:
{ABSOLUTE_PATH_TO_PLUGIN}/skills/{SKILL_NAME}/SKILL.md

STEP 2: Follow the workflow defined in that skill to analyze the listed files.
Focus on threats to the {PRIVACY_PROPERTY} privacy property.

STEP 3: Read the findings schema at:
{ABSOLUTE_PATH_TO_PLUGIN}/shared/schemas/findings.md

STEP 4: Output findings in the schema format. Set metadata.framework to "linddun"
and metadata.category to "{LETTER_CODE}".

FLAGS: --scope {SCOPE} --depth {DEPTH} --severity {SEVERITY}

IMPORTANT: Return ONLY the findings list. Do NOT produce a summary or
cross-category analysis. The dispatcher handles consolidation.

Launching

Emit one Task tool call per relevant category, ALL in a single response:

• subagent_type: "general-purpose"
• description: "LINDDUN {LETTER} - {CATEGORY_NAME}"
• prompt: The fully self-contained prompt above, filled in for this category.

Do NOT emit Task calls one at a time. Do NOT wait between dispatches.

Consolidation

After ALL subagents return their results:

1. Merge Findings

Collect all findings from all subagent responses into a single list.

2. Deduplicate

Two findings are duplicates if they share the same location.file AND location.line (or overlapping line ranges). When duplicates exist:

• Keep the finding with the higher severity.
• Merge LINDDUN category tags.
• Note the duplicate in the retained finding's description.

3. Regulatory Mapping

For each finding, map to applicable regulatory articles:

• GDPR: Map to specific articles (Art. 5, 6, 7, 12-14, 15, 17, 20, 25, 30, 32, 35, 44-49).
• CCPA: Map to specific sections (1798.100, 1798.105, 1798.120, 1798.140, 1798.150).
• HIPAA: Map where health data is involved. Use the regulatory mapping tables in linddun.md for guidance.

4. Cross-Reference

For each finding, populate cross-framework references:

• references.cwe: Map to CWE identifier (e.g., CWE-359, CWE-200, CWE-532).
• references.owasp: Map to OWASP Top 10 category where applicable.
• references.stride: Map to closest STRIDE category (see LINDDUN-to-STRIDE table).

5. Rank by Severity

Sort findings: critical > high > medium > low. Within the same severity, consider regulatory impact (GDPR violations rank higher than best-practice recommendations).

6. Present Results

Output the consolidated report in the requested --format. Include:

• Summary: categories checked, total findings, severity breakdown.
• Regulatory impact summary: which regulations are implicated.
• Per-element privacy matrix (similar to STRIDE per-element analysis but for LINDDUN categories).
• Findings list in severity order with regulatory article citations.
• Data flow privacy assessment: where personal data crosses trust boundaries.

Expert Mode

If --depth expert is set, after consolidation, launch adversarial privacy agents to simulate privacy attacks (re-identification, linkage, inference). Each agent receives the consolidated findings and attempts to demonstrate how an adversary could exploit privacy weaknesses to identify, track, or profile data subjects.

Red team output is appended to findings with prefix RT and metadata.tool set to "red-team".

Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.