Hyper Auto

hyper-auto — chain hyper-plan-loop into hyper-implement-loop

Single-gesture pipeline: hyper-plan-loop converges → hyper-implement-loop runs on the produced plan. Stops cleanly at any terminal state in between. No cron, no merge, no push, no autonomous follow-up rounds — just the two loops, chained.

When to use

• User has a task description and wants the full plan-harden → implement-harden chain in one go.

When to skip

• A plan already exists → use /hyperclaude:hyper-implement-loop directly.
• User wants to inspect / hand-edit the plan before implementing → use /hyperclaude:hyper-plan-loop, then decide.
• The experimental agent-teams feature is unavailable on this host (both inner loops require it; this skill inherits the requirement, not relaxes it).

Procedure

Step 1 — Run hyper-plan-loop

Invoke /hyperclaude:hyper-plan-loop <task> with the user's task description verbatim. Let it run to terminal state.

Step 2 — Branch on plan-loop's terminal state

• Clean exit (no blocking findings — plan-loop converged) → capture the plan path from the loop's report, proceed to Step 3.
• Cap reached (plan-loop's "revise loop" report — blocking findings still open after the 10-review budget) → STOP. Surface plan-loop's terminal report verbatim. Do NOT proceed.
• Any other terminal failure (bridge failure, planner-write/format failure, reply-contract failure, unparseable review, etc.) → STOP, surface the underlying report verbatim.

Implementing on a plan with unresolved blocking findings wastes the implement-loop budget on a known-broken input — this is the safety boundary.

Step 3 — Run hyper-implement-loop

Invoke /hyperclaude:hyper-implement-loop <plan-path-from-Step-1> with the canonical plan path captured from plan-loop's report. Let it run to terminal state.

Step 4 — Report

Relay both phases' Step 9 terminal facts so the user can audit the full chain. Do not paraphrase or invent fields — but apply ONE composed-flow exception:

• Suppress hyper-plan-loop's "Next step: /hyperclaude:hyper-implement " recommendation. That line fires on a clean plan-loop exit; under hyper-auto, Step 3 has already executed the implement phase, so relaying it verbatim would tell the user to re-implement an already-implemented plan. Drop that bullet from the relayed plan-loop report.

Plan-loop bullets to relay (Step 9 of hyper-plan-loop, minus the suppressed Next-step):

• The plan path.
• Slug-source (research-reused vs freshly-derived).
• Review iterations consumed.
• The final Codex verdict.
• Residual non-blocking findings (informational, never gating).

Implement-loop bullets to relay (Step 9 of hyper-implement-loop, verbatim):

• All reviewArtifacts[] paths.
• Review iterations consumed.
• The final Codex verdict.
• Residual non-blocking findings.
• Any resume-failed / fallback rounds noted.
• Branch / working-tree state + the implement-loop's own Next-step (this is the actionable user guidance for the composed flow's exit).

Anti-patterns

• Proceeding to implement-loop when plan-loop hit cap-reached ("revise loop" report). The plan still has unresolved blocking findings — the implement-loop is not the place to compensate.
• Calling this skill when a plan already exists. Use hyper-implement-loop directly; running plan-loop on a plan-shaped task description duplicates work.
• Hiding the intermediate plan-loop failure under a generic "auto failed" message — always surface the underlying terminal state so the user can diagnose.
• Modifying the plan between Step 1 and Step 3. The implement-loop receives the canonical plan-loop output as-is; out-of-band edits break the audit trail.

Source: zeikar/hyperclaude — distributed by TomeVault.