Lab Intelligence Planning
Guide lab managers and data science teams through designing, building, and governing a portfolio of BI products for clinical laboratories.
Workflows
This skill supports three primary workflows. Determine which applies based on user intent:
| User Intent | Workflow | Key References |
|---|---|---|
| "What should we build?" / "Where are our gaps?" | Discovery | personas.md, portfolio-types.md |
| "Design a dashboard for X" / "What should this report contain?" | Design | personas.md, quality-indicators.md |
| "How do we manage our reports?" / "Should we retire this?" | Governance | governance.md |
Discovery Workflow
Use when assessing current state or identifying what to build.
Step 1: Inventory Current State
Gather information about existing BI products:
- What reports/dashboards exist today?
- Who uses each one? How frequently?
- What systems source the data (LIS, LIMS, EHR, instruments)?
- What pain points exist (manual processes, data gaps, stale reports)?
Step 2: Map Stakeholder Needs
Load references/personas.md and work through each relevant persona:
- Which personas are served by current products?
- Which personas have unmet needs?
- What decisions does each persona need to make?
Step 3: Identify Portfolio Gaps
Load references/portfolio-types.md and assess coverage:
- Which archetype categories are well-covered?
- Which are missing or weak?
- Are there redundant products serving the same need?
Step 4: Prioritize Opportunities
For each gap identified, assess:
- Impact: How many personas benefit? How critical are their decisions?
- Feasibility: Is data available? What integration effort?
- Urgency: Regulatory deadline? Safety concern? Strategic initiative?
Output a prioritized backlog of BI products to build or improve.
Design Workflow
Use when specifying a new dashboard, report, or data product.
Step 1: Define the Product
Establish scope:
- Name: Clear, descriptive title
- Primary persona(s): Who is this for? (Load
references/personas.mdif needed) - Archetype: Which category? (Load
references/portfolio-types.mdif needed) - Key questions answered: What decisions will this enable?
Step 2: Specify Content
For each visualization or data element:
- Metric/measure: What is being shown?
- Dimensions: How can it be sliced (time, section, instrument, staff)?
- Comparisons: Targets, benchmarks, prior periods?
- Drill-down paths: What details should be accessible?
Load references/quality-indicators.md for standard KPIs by lab phase and specialty.
Step 3: Define Interactions
Specify user experience:
- Filters: What parameters can users control?
- Refresh frequency: Real-time, hourly, daily, on-demand?
- Alerts/thresholds: What conditions trigger notifications?
- Export needs: PDF, Excel, API access?
Step 4: Validate with Stakeholders
Before building:
- Review specification with primary persona representatives
- Confirm metrics align with how they actually make decisions
- Identify any missing context or comparisons
- Agree on acceptable data latency and accuracy requirements
Governance Workflow
Use when establishing or improving portfolio management practices.
Step 1: Establish Ownership Model
Load references/governance.md for detailed guidance. Key decisions:
- Product owner: Who approves changes and prioritizes enhancements?
- Data steward: Who ensures data quality and definitions?
- Technical owner: Who maintains the implementation?
Step 2: Define Review Cadence
Establish recurring review cycles:
- Usage review (quarterly): Which products are used? By whom?
- Quality review (quarterly): Are metrics accurate? Definitions current?
- Strategic review (annual): Does portfolio align with lab priorities?
Step 3: Set Lifecycle Policies
Define criteria for each lifecycle stage:
- Promotion: From pilot to production
- Enhancement: When to invest in improvements
- Deprecation: When to retire (low usage, superseded, inaccurate)
- Archival: How long to retain historical access
Step 4: Manage Portfolio Health
Ongoing activities:
- Track usage metrics for all products
- Maintain a portfolio registry with ownership and status
- Conduct rationalization exercises to reduce redundancy
- Balance self-service enablement with governed core products
Output Formats
Portfolio Assessment Summary
When completing discovery, output:
# Lab Intelligence Portfolio Assessment
## Current State
- Total products: [N]
- Active/used: [N]
- Orphaned/unused: [N]
## Coverage by Archetype
| Category | Products | Gaps |
|----------|----------|------|
| Operational | ... | ... |
| Quality/Compliance | ... | ... |
| Financial | ... | ... |
| Clinical Decision Support | ... | ... |
| Strategic | ... | ... |
## Coverage by Persona
[Table showing which personas are well-served vs. underserved]
## Recommended Priorities
1. [Priority 1 with rationale]
2. [Priority 2 with rationale]
3. [Priority 3 with rationale]
Product Specification
When completing design, output:
# [Product Name] Specification
## Overview
- **Archetype**: [Category]
- **Primary personas**: [List]
- **Key questions answered**: [List]
- **Refresh frequency**: [Frequency]
## Content Specification
| Element | Metric | Dimensions | Target/Benchmark |
|---------|--------|------------|------------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
## Interactions
- **Filters**: [List]
- **Drill-downs**: [List]
- **Alerts**: [Conditions and recipients]
## Data Requirements
- **Sources**: [Systems]
- **Latency**: [Acceptable delay]
- **Quality requirements**: [Accuracy, completeness]
## Governance
- **Product owner**: [Role]
- **Review cycle**: [Frequency]
Reference Files
Load these as needed based on the workflow:
references/personas.md- Detailed stakeholder needs by rolereferences/portfolio-types.md- Dashboard/report archetypes with examplesreferences/governance.md- Lifecycle management, ownership, review practicesreferences/quality-indicators.md- Standard KPIs by lab phase and specialty
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.