marketing-campaign-brief
Implements guild-plan.md §6.3 (marketing · campaign-brief) under §6.4 commercial principles: hypothesis-first (what belief about the audience does this campaign test?), success = pre-registered metric, evidence = the post-campaign data citation, not "engagement looked good."
What you do
Produce a brief tight enough that a copywriter, a social-media lead, and an SEO specialist can go heads-down and produce aligned work without asking "what are we doing again?" The brief is the single contract between strategy and production.
- Goal in one sentence, measurable: "drive 400 trial signups from mid-market ops leaders in 6 weeks."
- Audience: pull from the positioning doc's ICP; add campaign-specific segmentation if narrower.
- Core message: one claim, one proof, one CTA. Not five angles.
- Channels + per-channel role: which channel drives awareness, which drives conversion, which is a multiplier.
- Assets needed: list with owner (copywriter / designer / social / SEO / agency), format, length/spec, and deadline.
- Constraints: budget, brand rules, legal/compliance, embargo, exclusions.
- Success criteria: primary KPI + guardrails, with the measurement window.
- Timeline: kickoff → assets ready → launch → review, with dependency chain.
Output shape
A markdown file at .guild/runs/<run-id>/briefs/<slug>.md with sections:
- Goal — one sentence, numeric.
- Audience — ICP reference + campaign-specific narrowing.
- Core message — claim · proof · CTA.
- Channels — each with role (awareness / consideration / conversion).
- Assets needed — table of asset · format · owner · deadline · dependency.
- Constraints — budget, brand, legal, embargo.
- Success criteria — primary KPI + guardrails + measurement window.
- Timeline — key dates with dependencies.
- Out of scope — what this campaign is explicitly not doing.
Anti-patterns
- Vague goal ("raise awareness") — untestable.
- Missing constraints — leads to rework when legal/brand push back late.
- Asset list with no owners — a wishlist, not a brief.
- Five competing messages — the team picks arbitrary ones; alignment breaks.
- No success criteria — campaign can't be graded.
- Conflating brief with positioning — if the foundation is unclear, route to
marketing-positioning first.
- Missing "out of scope" — scope creep happens silently otherwise.
Handoff
Return the brief path to the invoking marketing specialist. Downstream the brief commissions copywriter-long-form, copywriter-product-microcopy, social-media-platform-post, social-media-thread, social-media-content-calendar, seo-on-page-optimization, and optionally marketing-ab-copy-variants for testable headlines. If the campaign reveals a positioning gap, route back to marketing-positioning. This skill does not dispatch.
Source: lookatitude/guild — distributed by TomeVault.
1---2name: lookatitude-guild-marketing-campaign-brief3description: marketing-campaign-brief4---56# marketing-campaign-brief78Implements `guild-plan.md §6.3` (marketing · campaign-brief) under `§6.4` commercial principles: hypothesis-first (what belief about the audience does this campaign test?), success = pre-registered metric, evidence = the post-campaign data citation, not "engagement looked good."910## What you do1112Produce a brief tight enough that a copywriter, a social-media lead, and an SEO specialist can go heads-down and produce aligned work without asking "what are we doing again?" The brief is the single contract between strategy and production.1314- Goal in one sentence, measurable: "drive 400 trial signups from mid-market ops leaders in 6 weeks."15- Audience: pull from the positioning doc's ICP; add campaign-specific segmentation if narrower.16- Core message: one claim, one proof, one CTA. Not five angles.17- Channels + per-channel role: which channel drives awareness, which drives conversion, which is a multiplier.18- Assets needed: list with owner (copywriter / designer / social / SEO / agency), format, length/spec, and deadline.19- Constraints: budget, brand rules, legal/compliance, embargo, exclusions.20- Success criteria: primary KPI + guardrails, with the measurement window.21- Timeline: kickoff → assets ready → launch → review, with dependency chain.2223## Output shape2425A markdown file at `.guild/runs/<run-id>/briefs/<slug>.md` with sections:26271. **Goal** — one sentence, numeric.282. **Audience** — ICP reference + campaign-specific narrowing.293. **Core message** — claim · proof · CTA.304. **Channels** — each with role (awareness / consideration / conversion).315. **Assets needed** — table of asset · format · owner · deadline · dependency.326. **Constraints** — budget, brand, legal, embargo.337. **Success criteria** — primary KPI + guardrails + measurement window.348. **Timeline** — key dates with dependencies.359. **Out of scope** — what this campaign is explicitly not doing.3637## Anti-patterns3839- Vague goal ("raise awareness") — untestable.40- Missing constraints — leads to rework when legal/brand push back late.41- Asset list with no owners — a wishlist, not a brief.42- Five competing messages — the team picks arbitrary ones; alignment breaks.43- No success criteria — campaign can't be graded.44- Conflating brief with positioning — if the foundation is unclear, route to `marketing-positioning` first.45- Missing "out of scope" — scope creep happens silently otherwise.4647## Handoff4849Return the brief path to the invoking `marketing` specialist. Downstream the brief commissions `copywriter-long-form`, `copywriter-product-microcopy`, `social-media-platform-post`, `social-media-thread`, `social-media-content-calendar`, `seo-on-page-optimization`, and optionally `marketing-ab-copy-variants` for testable headlines. If the campaign reveals a positioning gap, route back to `marketing-positioning`. This skill does not dispatch.5051---52> Source: [lookatitude/guild](https://github.com/lookatitude/guild) — distributed by [TomeVault](https://tomevault.io).53<!-- tomevault:4.0:skill_md:2026-06-16 -->