Mcaf Testing

MCAF: Testing

Trigger On

• implementing a feature or bugfix
• adding a regression test for a failure
• protecting a refactor with automated verification

Value

• produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
• reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
• leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

Do Not Use For

• repo-wide delivery policy with no test change
• documentation-only changes unless they alter executable verification

Inputs

• the nearest AGENTS.md
• the changed behaviour and touched boundaries
• existing tests near the impacted code path

Quick Start

1. Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.
2. Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.
3. Return the Required Result Format with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.

Workflow

1. Read the repo’s real verification commands from AGENTS.md.
2. Start with a failing test first when the change adds behaviour or fixes a bug.
3. Start with the smallest meaningful test scope:
   • new or changed tests
   • related suite
   • broader regressions
4. When the stack is .NET, use the external .NET skills from the Managed Code Skills catalog, use mcaf-dotnet as the orchestration skill when the task spans code, tests, and verification, and route framework mechanics through exactly one matching skill:
   • mcaf-dotnet-xunit
   • mcaf-dotnet-tunit
   • mcaf-dotnet-mstest
5. Prefer integration, API, or UI coverage when behaviour crosses boundaries.
6. Prove the user flow or caller-visible system flow, not just internal details.
7. Add a regression test for every bug that can be captured reliably.
8. If the stack is .NET and production code changed, do not stop at tests only. Finish with the repo-defined format and analyzer pass as well.
9. Use deeper testing references only when the repo’s current strategy is unclear.

Deliver

• automated tests close to the changed behaviour
• verification results that match the repo’s real commands

Validate

• the new behaviour is covered at the right level
• the main user flow or caller-visible system flow is proven
• tests assert meaningful outcomes, not implementation trivia
• coverage expectations from AGENTS.md are met, or the exception is documented
• the verification sequence matches AGENTS.md
• for .NET changes, tests were not treated as a substitute for formatting or analyzer gates
• broader suites are run after there is something real to verify

Ralph Loop

Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

1. Brainstorm first (mandatory):
   • analyze current state
   • define the problem, target outcome, constraints, and risks
   • generate options and think through trade-offs before committing
   • capture the recommended direction and open questions
2. Plan second (mandatory):
   • write a detailed execution plan from the chosen direction
   • list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
3. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
4. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
5. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
6. Update the plan after each iteration.
7. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
8. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

Required Result Format

• status: complete | clean | improved | configured | not_applicable | blocked
• plan: concise plan and current iteration step
• actions_taken: concrete changes made
• validation_skills: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
• verification: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
• remaining: top unresolved items or none

For setup-only requests with no execution, return status: configured and exact next commands.

Load References

• read references/test-planning.md first
• open references/automated-testing.md for deeper strategy and trade-offs
• for broader .NET implementation flow, use the external mcaf-dotnet skill from the Managed Code Skills catalog
• for .NET framework-specific mechanics, use exactly one external skill from the Managed Code Skills catalog: mcaf-dotnet-xunit, mcaf-dotnet-tunit, or mcaf-dotnet-mstest

Example Requests

• "Add tests for this bugfix."
• "Protect this refactor with regression coverage."
• "Choose the right test level for this API change."

Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.