Memory First Workflow

Memory-First Research Pattern

When answering questions about code, architecture, patterns, decisions, or technical choices, follow this workflow:

Step 1: Query Memory First

Before reading files or exploring code, check if memory already has the answer:

memory.recall "<topic>"

Example queries:

• memory.recall "authentication flow"
• memory.recall "database choice"
• memory.recall "error handling patterns"

Step 2: Use Specialized Shortcuts

For specific types of questions, use targeted memory tools:

Before Implementing Features

memory.decisions

Returns architectural decisions and constraints that may affect implementation.

Before Working with Frameworks/Databases

memory.architecture

Returns framework choices, database selection, and architectural patterns.

Before Writing Code

memory.conventions

Returns coding style, naming conventions, and project standards.

If Finding Contradictions

memory.conflicts

Returns open disputes that need resolution.

Step 3: Evaluate Memory Results

If memory has sufficient information:

• Answer using recalled facts
• Cite fact IDs or sources: "From memory (fact #42): ..."
• Avoid unnecessary file reads

If memory has partial information:

• Share what memory knows
• Note what needs investigation: "Memory shows we use PostgreSQL, but I need to check the connection pooling setup..."
• Proceed to file exploration for missing details

If memory has no information:

• Note explicitly: "Memory has no prior knowledge about [topic]"
• Proceed to file exploration
• After learning, consider if this should be stored in memory

Step 4: Explore Code (Only If Needed)

When memory is insufficient, use file exploration tools:

• Read for specific files
• Grep for searching content
• Glob for finding files by pattern
• Task (Explore agent) for broad investigations

Step 5: Distinguish Sources

When presenting findings, clearly separate:

• Recalled knowledge: "From memory: We use RSpec for testing"
• Discovered information: "From code exploration: Found additional test helper in spec/support/"

Why This Pattern Matters

Saves Time

Memory provides instant access to distilled knowledge without re-reading hundreds of files.

Provides Context

Past decisions, lessons learned, and rationale are preserved in memory.

Reduces Tokens

Recalled facts are concise compared to reading entire files.

Ensures Consistency

Prevents contradicting previous decisions or duplicating solved problems.

Improves Quality

Understanding past context leads to better decisions aligned with project history.

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

❌ Don't skip memory checks:

User: "What database do we use?"
Bad: *immediately reads config files*
Good: *checks memory.architecture first*

❌ Don't assume memory is wrong:

Bad: "Memory says PostgreSQL, let me verify by reading the config..."
Good: "Memory says PostgreSQL. Need any specific config details?"

❌ Don't ignore memory conflicts:

Bad: *finds conflict, picks one arbitrarily*
Good: "memory.conflicts shows authentication method disputed—let me investigate and resolve"

Example Workflow

User asks: "How do we handle errors in API responses?"

Step 1: Check memory

memory.recall "error handling API"
memory.conventions

Step 2: Evaluate results

• Memory shows: "Convention: API errors return JSON with error and message keys"
• Memory shows: "Decision: 4xx for client errors, 5xx for server errors"

Step 3: Answer with citations "From memory: We handle API errors by returning JSON with error and message keys. Client errors use 4xx status codes, server errors use 5xx. Is there a specific error case you're working with?"

Step 4: Only if needed, explore code If user asks: "Show me the error middleware" Then use Read/Grep to find the implementation.

This workflow is automatically loaded when you ask technical questions. You don't need to invoke it manually—it guides Claude's research process behind the scenes.

Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.