Paw Pr

Final PR

Execution Context: This skill runs directly in the PAW session (not a subagent), allowing user interaction for PR description and final checks.

Create the final PR merging all implementation work to the base branch (from WorkflowContext.md) after pre-flight validation.

Reference: Follow Core Implementation Principles from paw-workflow skill.

Capabilities

• Run pre-flight validation checks
• Execute stop-tracking operation for commit-and-clean lifecycle mode
• Create comprehensive PR description (scaled to complexity)
• Open final PR from target branch to main
• Provide merge and deployment guidance

Pre-flight Validation

Before creating the PR, verify and report status. Block on failures unless user explicitly confirms (except hard blockers — those cannot be overridden).

Required Checks

Phase Implementation:

• All phases in ImplementationPlan.md marked complete
• All phase PRs merged (prs strategy) or commits pushed (local strategy)
• Target branch exists with implementation commits
• No unresolved phase candidates (- [ ] items in ## Phase Candidates) — hard blocker: do NOT resolve or bypass; report to orchestrator to run Candidate Promotion Flow before retrying

Artifacts Exist (check existence per Workflow Mode):

• CodeResearch.md (required: all modes)
• ImplementationPlan.md (required: all modes)
• Spec.md (required: full mode; optional: minimal/custom)
• SpecResearch.md (optional: all modes)
• Docs.md (required: full mode; optional: minimal/custom)

Branch Status:

• Target branch up to date with base branch (from WorkflowContext.md, defaults to main)
• No merge conflicts

Build/Tests:

• Latest build passes on target branch (if applicable)
• All tests passing

Scratch Ignore Markers:

• No tracked scratch ignore markers under .paw/work/<work-id>/ scratch areas
• Scratch ignore markers (.gitignore files used to keep workflow/planning/reviews output local-only) must be removed from the index before PR creation if they became tracked

Open Questions Resolved:

• SpecResearch ## Open Unknowns → resolved in Spec or clarified
• CodeResearch ## Open Questions → resolved in Plan or code
• ImplementationPlan ## Open Questions → empty
• Unresolved items → block and report with recommendation

Workflow Mode Handling

Full Mode

• Reference all artifacts: Spec.md, SpecResearch.md, CodeResearch.md, ImplementationPlan.md, Docs.md
• PRs strategy: Include links to intermediate PRs (Planning, Phase, Docs)
• Local strategy: Describe work directly from commits

Minimal Mode

• Reference only core artifacts: CodeResearch.md, ImplementationPlan.md
• Check Spec.md and Docs.md existence before including
• Local strategy only (enforced)

Custom Mode

• Dynamically check which artifacts exist
• Adapt references based on Custom Workflow Instructions

Artifact Lifecycle Handling

Detect lifecycle mode using the same hierarchy as paw-transition: WorkflowContext.md Artifact Lifecycle: field → legacy field mapping (artifact_tracking: enabled/track_artifacts: true → commit-and-clean; disabled/false → never-commit) → .gitignore with * fallback → default commit-and-clean.

Scratch ignore markers are local-only lifecycle markers even in commit-and-clean or commit-and-persist workflows. Never intentionally commit .paw/work/<work-id>/.gitignore or nested scratch-area markers such as planning/.gitignore, reviews/.gitignore, or review-output directory markers. If any are tracked, remove them from the git index before creating the final PR.

Stop-Tracking Operation (commit-and-clean only)

Execute before PR creation. Skip gracefully if no tracked .paw/ files exist (idempotent).

1. Record the current HEAD commit SHA — this is the "last artifact commit" for PR description links
2. git rm --cached -r .paw/work/<work-id>/ — remove from index, preserve local files
3. Create .paw/work/<work-id>/.gitignore containing * — this file self-ignores (the * matches the .gitignore itself), so it stays untracked
4. git commit -m "Stop tracking PAW artifacts for <work-id>" — only the index deletions from step 2 are committed. Do NOT stage the .gitignore file.
5. Verify: git status shows no tracked .paw/ files or scratch ignore markers; .gitignore exists locally and is not tracked

Log each step so the user sees what's happening.

PR Description by Lifecycle Mode

• commit-and-clean: Include Artifacts section with link to the recorded last-artifact-commit SHA (e.g., tree/<sha>/.paw/work/<work-id>/)
• commit-and-persist: Include Artifacts section with direct links to artifacts on the target branch
• never-commit: Omit Artifacts section; summarize key information in PR body

PR Description Formats

Scale description to change complexity. Simple fixes need brief summaries; major features need comprehensive sections.

Simple Changes

For bug fixes, small features: title with [Work Title] prefix, close issue, brief summary, changes list, testing status, PAW footer.

Complex Changes

For large features, architectural changes, multi-phase implementations:

Include these elements as appropriate:

• Summary: Overview of what PR delivers and key design decisions
• Changes: Detailed changes with context and rationale
• Testing: Coverage notes, verification performed
• Breaking Changes: Migration guidance if applicable
• Deployment: Feature flags, rollout strategy, dependencies
• Artifacts: Links to workflow artifacts (per lifecycle mode — see Artifact Lifecycle Handling)

Footer: 🐾 Generated with [PAW](https://github.com/lossyrob/phased-agent-workflow)

PRs Strategy Sections

When intermediate PRs exist, include:

• Planning section referencing Planning PR
• Implementation Phases listing Phase PRs
• Documentation section referencing Docs PR

Local Strategy Sections

When no intermediate PRs:

• Implementation Summary describing work from commit history
• Focus on what was implemented, not which PRs

PR Creation

Final PR context requirements:

• Source: <target_branch> (from WorkflowContext.md)
• Target: <base_branch> (from WorkflowContext.md, defaults to main)
• Title format: [<Work Title>] <description>
• Body: Scaled description per formats above
• Issue linking: Include Issue URL from WorkflowContext.md

Merge Guidance

After PR creation, provide:

• Summary of what reviewers should focus on
• Deployment considerations (if any)
• Next steps for completion

Quality Checklist

• All pre-flight checks pass (or user confirmed proceed)
• PR description complete with all relevant sections
• All artifact links valid (per lifecycle mode)
• Scratch ignore markers are not tracked in the final PR diff
• Intermediate PR links included (if prs strategy)
• Breaking changes documented (or stated "None")
• Issue URL linked in PR body

Guardrails

• Do NOT modify code or documentation
• Do NOT approve or merge PRs
• Do NOT address review comments (Implementer handles this)
• Do NOT guess artifact locations—verify existence

Completion Response

Report back:

• Final PR URL
• Pre-flight validation summary
• Items for reviewer attention
• Merge readiness assessment

Next steps: Address PR feedback via address comments, then merge to complete workflow.

Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.