Paw Review Github

PAW Review GitHub Skill

Post finalized review comments to GitHub as a pending review. This skill only posts comments marked as ready, filtering out skipped comments while preserving the complete review history in ReviewComments.md.

Reference: Follow Core Review Principles from paw-review-workflow skill.

Prerequisites

Verify ReviewComments.md exists in .paw/reviews/<identifier>/ with:

• Status: finalized
• All comments have **Final**: markers
• At least one comment marked **Final**: ✓ Ready for GitHub posting

Also verify:

• GitHub PR context available (owner, repo, PR number)
• For multi-repo reviews: PR context available for each repository

If ReviewComments.md is not finalized or missing **Final**: markers, report blocked status—Critique Response pass must complete first.

Non-GitHub Context: If this is not a GitHub PR review (e.g., local branch diff), skip GitHub posting and provide manual posting instructions instead.

Core Responsibilities

• Read all comments from finalized ReviewComments.md
• Filter to only comments marked **Final**: ✓ Ready for GitHub posting
• Create GitHub pending review with filtered comments
• Update ReviewComments.md with posted status and review IDs
• Handle multi-PR scenarios (create pending review per PR)
• Provide manual posting instructions for non-GitHub contexts

Process Steps

Step 1: Load ReviewComments.md

Read the finalized ReviewComments.md and verify:

• Status field shows finalized
• All comments have **Final**: markers
• Extract GitHub PR context (owner, repo, PR number)

If not finalized:

Blocked: ReviewComments.md status is not 'finalized'.
Run paw-review-feedback in Critique Response Mode first.

Step 2: Filter Postable Comments

Identify comments to post:

Include comments where **Final**: contains:

• ✓ Ready for GitHub posting
• Ready for GitHub posting

Exclude comments where **Final**: contains:

• Skipped per critique
• Skipped
• Any other status not explicitly "Ready for GitHub posting"

Build list of postable comments with:

• File path
• Line number or range
• Comment text (use **Updated Comment:** if present, otherwise original description)
• Suggestion code (use **Updated Suggestion:** if present, otherwise original)

Step 3: Create Pending Review (GitHub PRs)

Use GitHub MCP tools to create pending review:

3.1 Create Pending Review:

mcp_github_pull_request_review_write(
  owner: "<owner>",
  repo: "<repo>",
  pullNumber: <number>,
  method: "create",
  body: "<review-summary>\n\n---\n🐾 Review generated with [PAW Review](https://github.com/lossyrob/phased-agent-workflow)"
  // Note: event omitted to create pending (draft) review
)

The review body should include a brief summary of the review (number of comments, key themes) followed by the PAW Review attribution footer.

Record the pending review ID.

3.2 Add Comments to Pending Review:

For EACH postable comment:

mcp_github_add_comment_to_pending_review(
  owner: "<owner>",
  repo: "<repo>",
  pullNumber: <number>,
  path: "<file-path>",
  line: <line-number>,  // or startLine/line for multi-line
  body: "<comment-text-and-suggestion>",
  side: "RIGHT",
  subjectType: "LINE"  // or "FILE" for file-level comments
)

Comment Body Construction:

• Include description text (updated if modified, original otherwise)
• Include code suggestion in markdown code block
• Do NOT include rationale, assessment, or internal markers
• Do NOT include **Final**: or other PAW-specific formatting
• Do NOT include attribution footer on inline comments (attribution is on the review body only)

Example Posted Comment:

Missing null check before accessing user.profile could cause runtime error.

```suggestion
if (user?.profile) {
  return user.profile.name;
}
return 'Anonymous';

### Step 4: Update ReviewComments.md

After posting, update each posted comment in ReviewComments.md:

**Add Posted Status:**
```markdown
**Final**: ✓ Ready for GitHub posting
**Posted**: ✓ GitHub pending review (Review ID: 12345678, Comment ID: abc123)

For Skipped Comments:

**Final**: Skipped per critique - stylistic preference
**Posted**: — (not posted per critique)

Update the file header:

**Status**: Posted to GitHub pending review
**Pending Review ID**: 12345678
**Comments Posted**: 6 of 8 (2 skipped per critique)

Step 5: Multi-PR Pending Reviews

When reviewing PRs across multiple repositories:

Detection: Multi-PR mode applies when:

• Multiple artifact directories exist (.paw/reviews/PR-<number>-<repo-slug>/)
• ReviewComments.md files exist in multiple PR directories
• ReviewContext.md contains related_prs entries

Per-PR Processing:

1. Iterate PRs: For each PR in the review set:

   • Read ReviewComments.md from that PR's artifact directory
   • Filter to postable comments for that PR
   • Create separate pending review on that PR
   • Update that PR's ReviewComments.md with posted status

2. Cross-Reference in Comments: When posting cross-repo comments:

   • Include cross-reference notation from the comment
   • Example: (See also: owner/other-repo#456 for related change)

GitHub Tool Calls for Multiple PRs:

# PR 1: repo-a
mcp_github_pull_request_review_write(owner, "repo-a", 123, method="create", body="<summary>\n\n---\n🐾 Review generated with [PAW Review](https://github.com/lossyrob/phased-agent-workflow)")
mcp_github_add_comment_to_pending_review(...)  # postable comments for PR-123

# PR 2: repo-b  
mcp_github_pull_request_review_write(owner, "repo-b", 456, method="create", body="<summary>\n\n---\n🐾 Review generated with [PAW Review](https://github.com/lossyrob/phased-agent-workflow)")
mcp_github_add_comment_to_pending_review(...)  # postable comments for PR-456

Error Handling: If pending review creation fails for one PR:

• Document the failure in that PR's ReviewComments.md
• Continue with other PRs
• Provide manual posting instructions for failed PR
• Report partial success in completion response

Step 6: Non-GitHub Context

For non-GitHub workflows (local branch review):

Skip GitHub Posting:

• Do not attempt to call GitHub MCP tools
• Update ReviewComments.md status to finalized (non-GitHub)

Provide Manual Posting Instructions:

Append to ReviewComments.md:

---

## Manual Posting Instructions

This review was conducted on a non-GitHub context. To post comments manually:

### Comments Ready for Posting (X total)

1. **File: auth.ts, Lines 45-50**
   > Missing null check before accessing user.profile could cause runtime error.
   
   Suggestion:
   ```typescript
   if (user?.profile) {
     return user.profile.name;
   }
   return 'Anonymous';

2. File: db.ts, Lines 120-125

   [Comment text...]

Skipped Comments (Y total)

These comments were evaluated as low-value by the critique process and are not recommended for posting:

• File: api.ts L88 - Skipped: stylistic preference

## Guardrails

**Post Only Finalized Comments:**
- NEVER post comments without `**Final**: ✓ Ready for GitHub posting`
- Comments marked Skip must NOT be posted
- Respect critique recommendations

**Pending Review Only:**
- NEVER submit the pending review automatically
- Use `method: "create"` without event parameter
- Human reviewer must explicitly submit

**No Rationale in Posted Comments:**
- Posted comments contain only description and suggestion
- Rationale, assessment, and internal markers stay in ReviewComments.md
- PAW artifacts never referenced in posted comments

**Preserve History:**
- Do not modify original comment text when adding Posted status
- Keep all history: original → assessment → updated → posted
- Skipped comments remain in artifact for documentation

**Human Control:**
- Pending review is a draft—reviewer can edit/delete before submitting
- Reviewer can manually add skipped comments if they disagree with critique
- Final submission decision rests with human reviewer

## Validation Checklist

Before completing, verify:

- [ ] ReviewComments.md was finalized (had `**Final**:` markers on all comments)
- [ ] Only comments marked "Ready for GitHub posting" were posted
- [ ] Skipped comments NOT posted to GitHub
- [ ] Pending review created (not submitted)
- [ ] All posted comments have `**Posted**:` status in ReviewComments.md
- [ ] ReviewComments.md header updated with Pending Review ID and counts
- [ ] Posted comment bodies contain only description + suggestion (no rationale)
- [ ] Multi-PR: Each PR has its own pending review
- [ ] Non-GitHub: Manual posting instructions provided

## Completion Response

**GitHub PRs (Success):**

Activity complete. Artifact updated: .paw/reviews//ReviewComments.md

GitHub Posting Summary:

• Pending Review Created: Review ID 12345678
• Comments Posted: 6 of 8 (2 skipped per critique)
• Status: Pending review awaiting human submission

Posted comments:

Skipped (not posted):

• api.ts L88 - stylistic preference
• utils.ts L200 - already addressed

NOTE: The pending review is ready for your review in GitHub. Edit or delete any comments, then submit when satisfied.

**Multi-PR (Success):**

Activity complete.

GitHub Posting Summary:

• PR repo-a#123: Pending review created (Review ID: 111), 4 comments posted
• PR repo-b#456: Pending review created (Review ID: 222), 3 comments posted
• Total: 7 comments posted, 2 skipped

Artifacts updated:

• .paw/reviews/PR-123-repo-a/ReviewComments.md
• .paw/reviews/PR-456-repo-b/ReviewComments.md

NOTE: Review pending reviews in GitHub for each PR before submitting.

**Non-GitHub:**

Activity complete. Artifact updated: .paw/reviews//ReviewComments.md

Non-GitHub Context - Manual Posting Required:

• Comments ready for posting: 6
• Comments skipped per critique: 2
• Manual posting instructions added to ReviewComments.md

Review the Manual Posting Instructions section to post comments to your review platform.

**Partial Failure:**

Activity complete with errors.

GitHub Posting Summary:

• PR repo-a#123: ✓ Success (Review ID: 111, 4 comments)
• PR repo-b#456: ✗ Failed - permission denied

Partial success: 1 of 2 PRs posted. Manual posting instructions added for failed PR.

---
> Converted and distributed by [TomeVault](https://tomevault.io/claim/lossyrob) — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.
<!-- tomevault:4.0:skill_md:2026-04-11 -->