Postmortem Analysis
Skill Profile
(Select at least one profile to enable specific modules)
Overview
A postmortem (also called incident review or retrospective) is a structured process for analyzing incidents to understand what happened, why it happened, and how to prevent similar incidents in the future. The goal is learning, not blaming.
Core Principle: "Blame the system, not the person. Every incident is an opportunity to learn and improve."
Why This Matters
Core Concepts & Rules
1. Core Principles
- Follow established patterns and conventions
- Maintain consistency across codebase
- Document decisions and trade-offs
2. Implementation Guidelines
- Start with the simplest viable solution
- Iterate based on feedback and requirements
- Test thoroughly before deployment
Inputs / Outputs / Contracts
- Inputs:
- <e.g., env vars, request payload, file paths, schema>
- Entry Conditions:
- <Pre-requisites: e.g., Repo initialized, DB running, specific branch checked out>
- Outputs:
- <e.g., artifacts (PR diff, docs, tests, dashboard JSON)>
- Artifacts Required (Deliverables):
- <e.g., Code Diff, Unit Tests, Migration Script, API Docs>
- Acceptance Evidence:
- <e.g., Test Report (screenshot/log), Benchmark Result, Security Scan Report>
- Success Criteria:
- <e.g., p95 < 300ms, coverage ≥ 80%>
Skill Composition
- Depends on: None
- Compatible with: None
- Conflicts with: None
- Related Skills: None
Quick Start / Implementation Example
- Review requirements and constraints
- Set up development environment
- Implement core functionality following patterns
- Write tests for critical paths
- Run tests and fix issues
- Document any deviations or decisions
# Example implementation following best practices
def example_function():
# Your implementation here
pass
Assumptions / Constraints / Non-goals
- Assumptions:
- Development environment is properly configured
- Required dependencies are available
- Team has basic understanding of domain
- Constraints:
- Must follow existing codebase conventions
- Time and resource limitations
- Compatibility requirements
- Non-goals:
- This skill does not cover edge cases outside scope
- Not a replacement for formal training
Compatibility & Prerequisites
- Supported Versions:
- Python 3.8+
- Node.js 16+
- Modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
- Required AI Tools:
- Code editor (VS Code recommended)
- Testing framework appropriate for language
- Version control (Git)
- Dependencies:
- Language-specific package manager
- Build tools
- Testing libraries
- Environment Setup:
.env.example keys: API_KEY, DATABASE_URL (no values)
Test Scenario Matrix (QA Strategy)
| Type |
Focus Area |
Required Scenarios / Mocks |
| Unit |
Core Logic |
Must cover primary logic and at least 3 edge/error cases. Target minimum 80% coverage |
| Integration |
DB / API |
All external API calls or database connections must be mocked during unit tests |
| E2E |
User Journey |
Critical user flows to test |
| Performance |
Latency / Load |
Benchmark requirements |
| Security |
Vuln / Auth |
SAST/DAST or dependency audit |
| Frontend |
UX / A11y |
Accessibility checklist (WCAG), Performance Budget (Lighthouse score) |
Technical Guardrails & Security Threat Model
1. Security & Privacy (Threat Model)
- Top Threats: Injection attacks, authentication bypass, data exposure
2. Performance & Resources
3. Architecture & Scalability
4. Observability & Reliability
Agent Directives & Error Recovery
(ข้อกำหนดสำหรับ AI Agent ในการคิดและแก้ปัญหาเมื่อเกิดข้อผิดพลาด)
- Thinking Process: Analyze root cause before fixing. Do not brute-force.
- Fallback Strategy: Stop after 3 failed test attempts. Output root cause and ask for human intervention/clarification.
- Self-Review: Check against Guardrails & Anti-patterns before finalizing.
- Output Constraints: Output ONLY the modified code block. Do not explain unless asked.
Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist
Anti-patterns / Pitfalls
- ⛔ Don't: Log PII, catch-all exception, N+1 queries
- ⚠️ Watch out for: Common symptoms and quick fixes
- 💡 Instead: Use proper error handling, pagination, and logging
Reference Links & Examples
- Internal documentation and examples
- Official documentation and best practices
- Community resources and discussions
Versioning & Changelog
- Version: 1.0.0
- Changelog:
- 2026-02-22: Initial version with complete template structure
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.
1---2name: postmortem-analysis3description: Use when working with a postmortem (also called incident review or retrospective) is a structured4---56# Postmortem Analysis78## Skill Profile9*(Select at least one profile to enable specific modules)*10- [ ] **DevOps**11- [x] **Backend**12- [ ] **Frontend**13- [ ] **AI-RAG**14- [ ] **Security Critical**1516## Overview17A postmortem (also called incident review or retrospective) is a structured process for analyzing incidents to understand what happened, why it happened, and how to prevent similar incidents in the future. The goal is learning, not blaming.1819**Core Principle**: "Blame the system, not the person. Every incident is an opportunity to learn and improve."2021## Why This Matters22- **<Benefit>**: <short explanation>23- **<Benefit>**: <short explanation>24- **<Benefit>**: <short explanation>2526## Core Concepts & Rules2728### 1. Core Principles29- Follow established patterns and conventions30- Maintain consistency across codebase31- Document decisions and trade-offs3233### 2. Implementation Guidelines34- Start with the simplest viable solution35- Iterate based on feedback and requirements36- Test thoroughly before deployment373839## Inputs / Outputs / Contracts40* **Inputs**:41 - <e.g., env vars, request payload, file paths, schema>42* **Entry Conditions**:43 - <Pre-requisites: e.g., Repo initialized, DB running, specific branch checked out>44* **Outputs**:45 - <e.g., artifacts (PR diff, docs, tests, dashboard JSON)>46* **Artifacts Required (Deliverables)**:47 - <e.g., Code Diff, Unit Tests, Migration Script, API Docs>48* **Acceptance Evidence**:49 - <e.g., Test Report (screenshot/log), Benchmark Result, Security Scan Report>50* **Success Criteria**:51 - <e.g., p95 < 300ms, coverage ≥ 80%>5253## Skill Composition54* **Depends on**: None55* **Compatible with**: None56* **Conflicts with**: None57* **Related Skills**: None5859## Quick Start / Implementation Example60611. Review requirements and constraints622. Set up development environment633. Implement core functionality following patterns644. Write tests for critical paths655. Run tests and fix issues666. Document any deviations or decisions6768```python69# Example implementation following best practices70def example_function():71 # Your implementation here72 pass73```747576## Assumptions / Constraints / Non-goals7778* **Assumptions**:79 - Development environment is properly configured80 - Required dependencies are available81 - Team has basic understanding of domain82* **Constraints**:83 - Must follow existing codebase conventions84 - Time and resource limitations85 - Compatibility requirements86* **Non-goals**:87 - This skill does not cover edge cases outside scope88 - Not a replacement for formal training899091## Compatibility & Prerequisites9293* **Supported Versions**:94 - Python 3.8+95 - Node.js 16+96 - Modern browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)97* **Required AI Tools**:98 - Code editor (VS Code recommended)99 - Testing framework appropriate for language100 - Version control (Git)101* **Dependencies**:102 - Language-specific package manager103 - Build tools104 - Testing libraries105* **Environment Setup**:106 - `.env.example` keys: `API_KEY`, `DATABASE_URL` (no values)107108109## Test Scenario Matrix (QA Strategy)110111| Type | Focus Area | Required Scenarios / Mocks |112| :--- | :--- | :--- |113| **Unit** | Core Logic | Must cover primary logic and at least 3 edge/error cases. Target minimum 80% coverage |114| **Integration** | DB / API | All external API calls or database connections must be mocked during unit tests |115| **E2E** | User Journey | Critical user flows to test |116| **Performance** | Latency / Load | Benchmark requirements |117| **Security** | Vuln / Auth | SAST/DAST or dependency audit |118| **Frontend** | UX / A11y | Accessibility checklist (WCAG), Performance Budget (Lighthouse score) |119120121## Technical Guardrails & Security Threat Model122123### 1. Security & Privacy (Threat Model)124* **Top Threats**: Injection attacks, authentication bypass, data exposure125- [ ] **Data Handling**: Sanitize all user inputs to prevent Injection attacks. Never log raw PII126- [ ] **Secrets Management**: No hardcoded API keys. Use Env Vars/Secrets Manager127- [ ] **Authorization**: Validate user permissions before state changes128129### 2. Performance & Resources130- [ ] **Execution Efficiency**: Consider time complexity for algorithms131- [ ] **Memory Management**: Use streams/pagination for large data132- [ ] **Resource Cleanup**: Close DB connections/file handlers in finally blocks133134### 3. Architecture & Scalability135- [ ] **Design Pattern**: Follow SOLID principles, use Dependency Injection136- [ ] **Modularity**: Decouple logic from UI/Frameworks137138### 4. Observability & Reliability139- [ ] **Logging Standards**: Structured JSON, include trace IDs `request_id`140- [ ] **Metrics**: Track `error_rate`, `latency`, `queue_depth`141- [ ] **Error Handling**: Standardized error codes, no bare except142- [ ] **Observability Artifacts**:143 - **Log Fields**: timestamp, level, message, request_id144 - **Metrics**: request_count, error_count, response_time145 - **Dashboards/Alerts**: High Error Rate > 5%146147148## Agent Directives & Error Recovery149*(ข้อกำหนดสำหรับ AI Agent ในการคิดและแก้ปัญหาเมื่อเกิดข้อผิดพลาด)*150151- **Thinking Process**: Analyze root cause before fixing. Do not brute-force.152- **Fallback Strategy**: Stop after 3 failed test attempts. Output root cause and ask for human intervention/clarification.153- **Self-Review**: Check against Guardrails & Anti-patterns before finalizing.154- **Output Constraints**: Output ONLY the modified code block. Do not explain unless asked.155156157## Definition of Done (DoD) Checklist158159- [ ] Tests passed + coverage met160- [ ] Lint/Typecheck passed161- [ ] Logging/Metrics/Trace implemented162- [ ] Security checks passed163- [ ] Documentation/Changelog updated164- [ ] Accessibility/Performance requirements met (if frontend)165166167## Anti-patterns / Pitfalls168169* ⛔ **Don't**: Log PII, catch-all exception, N+1 queries170* ⚠️ **Watch out for**: Common symptoms and quick fixes171* 💡 **Instead**: Use proper error handling, pagination, and logging172173174## Reference Links & Examples175176* Internal documentation and examples177* Official documentation and best practices178* Community resources and discussions179180181## Versioning & Changelog182183* **Version**: 1.0.0184* **Changelog**:185 - 2026-02-22: Initial version with complete template structure186187---188> Converted and distributed by [TomeVault](https://tomevault.io/claim/amnadtaowsoam) — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.189<!-- tomevault:4.0:skill_md:2026-04-13 -->