How do I install the Pr Authoring skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add tomevault-io/pr-authoring in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Pr Authoring safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Independent scanners report: SkillSpector: PASS, Skill Scanner: PASS. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Pr Authoring?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Pr Authoring free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Pr Authoring?

tomevault-io (@tomevault-io) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Pr Authoring by tomevault-io — Agent Skill

Name: Pr Authoring
Author: tomevault-io

File contents

Authoring a pull request for fast-check

Title — gitmoji convention

See CONTRIBUTING.md (§ "Naming your pull request") and .github/copilot-instructions.md for the full emoji mapping.

Main package: emoji Description
Other packages: emoji(scope) Description
- Scopes: ava, jest, vitest, worker, poisoning, packaged
The Description part must be ≤ 50 characters.

Common emojis: ✨ feature · 🐛 fix · 📝 docs · ✅ tests · 🏷️ types · ⚡️ perf · ♻️ refactor · 🔧 config · 🎨 style · 🔥 remove · ⬆️ upgrade deps · ⬇️ downgrade deps · 🗑️ deprecation · 👷 CI.

Body — always use the template

Copy .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md verbatim. Keep every section and every checklist item, in order. Do not delete, rename, or reorder anything.
Never tick a checkbox. Every - [ ] stays unchecked — the reviewer (or the author during review) ticks them.
Link the issue with Fixes #<n> when one exists.

Description section — required order

End-user point of view first. What does this PR bring to users? New capability, fixed behavior, changed default, …? Call out any implied changes: breaking changes, migration steps, perf characteristics, deprecations.
Then justify. Why this change, why this design, main trade-offs considered — enough context for a reviewer to evaluate the approach.

Enrich the description from the checklist

Don't tick the boxes, but use them as prompts to preempt reviewer questions inside the description prose:

Impact level — minor / patch / major (and mention if pnpm run bump or the changeset bot instructions were followed).
Single-concern scope — state that the PR is focused, or explain why bundled changes belong together.
Tests — which tests were added/updated, what they cover, and why they would have failed without this PR. If no tests, say why.
Gitmoji / scope — the title itself is evidence; no need to restate.
Understanding of every line — nothing to write, but keep it true.

Source: dubzzz/fast-check — distributed by TomeVault.

---name: pr-authoringdescription: Use whenever creating, drafting, or updating a pull request (title or body) for the dubzzz/fast-check repository, including via the mcp__github__create_pull_request and mcp__github__update_pull_request tools.---# Authoring a pull request for fast-check## Title — gitmoji conventionSee `CONTRIBUTING.md` (§ "Naming your pull request") and`.github/copilot-instructions.md` for the full emoji mapping.- Main package: `emoji Description`- Other packages: `emoji(scope) Description` - Scopes: `ava`, `jest`, `vitest`, `worker`, `poisoning`, `packaged`- The Description part must be ≤ 50 characters.Common emojis: ✨ feature · 🐛 fix · 📝 docs · ✅ tests · 🏷️ types ·⚡️ perf · ♻️ refactor · 🔧 config · 🎨 style · 🔥 remove ·⬆️ upgrade deps · ⬇️ downgrade deps · 🗑️ deprecation · 👷 CI.## Body — always use the template1. Copy `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` **verbatim**. Keep every section and every checklist item, in order. Do not delete, rename, or reorder anything.2. **Never tick a checkbox.** Every `- [ ]` stays unchecked — the reviewer (or the author during review) ticks them.3. Link the issue with `Fixes #<n>` when one exists.## Description section — required order1. **End-user point of view first.** What does this PR bring to users? New capability, fixed behavior, changed default, …? Call out any implied changes: breaking changes, migration steps, perf characteristics, deprecations.2. **Then justify.** Why this change, why this design, main trade-offs considered — enough context for a reviewer to evaluate the approach.## Enrich the description from the checklistDon't tick the boxes, but use them as prompts to preempt reviewerquestions inside the description prose:- **Impact level** — minor / patch / major (and mention if `pnpm run bump` or the changeset bot instructions were followed).- **Single-concern scope** — state that the PR is focused, or explain why bundled changes belong together.- **Tests** — which tests were added/updated, what they cover, and why they would have failed without this PR. If no tests, say why.- **Gitmoji / scope** — the title itself is evidence; no need to restate.- **Understanding of every line** — nothing to write, but keep it true.---> Source: [dubzzz/fast-check](https://github.com/dubzzz/fast-check) — distributed by [TomeVault](https://tomevault.io).

Frequently asked questions

Pr Authoring