Pr Comments

PR Comments Triage (Gait)

Execute this workflow when asked to review PR comments from agents/Codex and recommend what should actually be implemented and how.

Scope

• Repository context: /Users/tr/gait
• Input PRs: user-provided PR number(s)
• Mode: analysis and recommendation only (read-only by default)
• No code changes, commits, or pushes in this skill unless explicitly requested in a follow-up

Input Contract (Mandatory)

• pr_numbers: one or more PR numbers
• Optional:
• repo (owner/name if not inferable from current git remote)
• include_non_agent_comments (false by default)

If pr_numbers is missing, stop and report blocker.

Workflow

1. Resolve repository and PR targets from input.
2. For each PR:

• fetch PR metadata (state, base/head, latest head SHA)
• fetch review comments, review summaries, and issue comments
• collect inline comment context (file + line + diff hunk when available)

3. Filter comments:

• include agent/Codex comments by default
• exclude outdated/stale comments not applicable to latest head SHA
• collapse duplicates/near-duplicates

4. Triage each comment into:

• implement
• defer
• reject

5. Score each triaged item:

• severity (P0/P1/P2/P3)
• confidence (high/medium/low)
• impact area (safety, determinism, contract, portability, docs, maintainability)

6. Produce implementation guidance for implement items:

• what to change
• why it matters
• minimal safe fix direction
• tests/validation required

7. Produce rationale for defer/reject:

• reason and conditions to revisit

8. Generate final user-facing recommendation report.

Triage Rules (Gait-Specific)

Prioritize comments that affect:

1. Fail-closed behavior and enforcement boundaries.
2. Determinism (verify/diff/replay/pack reproducibility).
3. Schema and CLI contract stability (--json, exit codes, compatibility).
4. Security/privacy controls (signing, secrets handling, unsafe interlocks).
5. Cross-platform/CI portability issues.
6. Docs drift where behavior has changed.

Deprioritize or reject:

• style-only nits with no runtime/contract impact
• speculative refactors outside PR scope
• stale comments already fixed on newer commits

Command Anchors

• Use gait JSON outputs when validating recommendation risk:
  • gait doctor --json
  • gait gate eval --policy <policy.yaml> --intent <intent.json> --json
  • gait pack verify <pack.zip> --json

Recommendation Format (Per Implement Item)

• PR: number
• Comment ref: reviewer + permalink (or comment id)
• Location: file:line (if inline)
• Decision: implement
• Severity: P0/P1/P2/P3
• Why: risk and concrete break scenario
• How: concise implementation direction (no code unless asked)
• Validation: exact tests/checks to run

Output Contract

Return sections in this order:

1. Implement Now (ordered by severity, then confidence)
2. Defer (with trigger/condition for future action)
3. Reject (with concise rationale)
4. Cross-PR Patterns (optional: repeated root causes seen across PRs)
5. Validation Plan (commands/checks required if user asks to implement)

Safety Rules

• Read-only analysis by default.
• Do not edit files or run git write operations in this skill.
• Do not claim a comment is resolved unless verified against current head.
• Keep recommendations scoped to actual comment evidence.

Quality Rules

• Evidence-first: every recommendation must map to a real comment.
• Distinguish facts from inference.
• Avoid generic advice; tie guidance to exact files/contracts.
• Prefer minimal-risk changes over broad refactors.

Failure Mode

If comments cannot be fetched or are insufficient:

• No actionable PR comment triage produced.
• Reason: concise blocker
• Missing inputs/access: exact requirement (PR numbers, repo, auth, permission)

Do not fabricate recommendations.

Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.