Development Process
AUTONOMOUS EXECUTION. This process runs automatically. It only pauses when human input is genuinely required.
Branch Workflow (CRITICAL)
main ← STABLE ONLY (releases from dev)
↑
dev ← INTEGRATION (all work merges here first)
↑
feature/* ← WHERE WORK HAPPENS
ALL changes go to dev first. Main is ALWAYS stable.
| Action | Target Branch |
|---|---|
| Feature work | PR to dev |
| Bug fixes | PR to dev |
| Releases | PR from dev to main |
Autonomous Principles
- Fix issues automatically - Don't ask permission for obvious fixes
- Implement safe improvements automatically - Low effort + safe = just do it
- Loop until clean - Keep fixing until tests pass and no findings
- Only pause for genuine decisions - Ambiguity, architecture, risk
- PR to dev by default - Never PR to main unless releasing
Phase Overview
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DEVELOPMENT PHASE (AUTONOMOUS) │
│ Implement → Test → Review+Fix → Suggest+Implement → Loop │
│ Pause only for: ambiguous requirements, architectural decisions │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DEPLOYMENT PHASE (if applicable) │
│ Deploy → Test → Review+Fix → Commit │
│ Pause only for: deployment failures needing human intervention │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PR PHASE (to dev) │
│ Create PR to dev → Review+Fix → WAIT for approval │
│ Pause for: merge approval (ALWAYS requires explicit user OK) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ RELEASE PHASE (dev → main, only when requested) │
│ Stabilize dev → Create release PR → Tag → WAIT for approval │
│ Pause for: release approval (requires explicit "release" cmd) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Phase 1: Development (AUTONOMOUS)
Step 1.0: Memory Check (AUTOMATIC)
BEFORE implementing, search memory:
memory search: "relevant keywords"
(CLI fallback, if you prefer commands: `node ./.claude/skills/memory/cli.js search "relevant keywords"`
for project installs, or `node ~/.claude/skills/memory/cli.js search "relevant keywords"` for user installs.)
IF similar problem solved before:
- Review the solution
- Apply or adapt it
- Skip re-solving known problems
This step is SILENT - no user notification needed.
Step 1.1: Implement
Implement feature/fix
Step 1.2: Test Loop
Run tests
IF tests fail:
Analyze failure
Fix automatically if clear
GOTO Step 1.2
IF tests pass:
Continue to Step 1.3
Step 1.3: Review + Auto-Fix
Run reviewer skill
- Finds: logic errors, regressions, security issues, file placement
- FIXES AUTOMATICALLY (don't ask permission)
IF fixes made:
GOTO Step 1.2 (re-test)
IF needs human decision:
PAUSE - present options, wait for input
IF clean:
Continue to Step 1.4
Step 1.4: Suggest + Auto-Implement
Run suggest skill
- Identifies improvements
- AUTO-IMPLEMENTS safe ones (low effort, no behavior change)
- PRESENTS risky ones to user
IF auto-implemented:
GOTO Step 1.2 (re-test)
IF needs human decision:
PAUSE - present suggestions, wait for input
User chooses: implement some/all/none
IF implementing: GOTO Step 1.2
IF clean or user says proceed:
Continue to Phase 2 or 3
Step 1.5: Memory Save (AUTOMATIC)
IF key decision was made (architecture, pattern, fix):
Remember:
- Title: ...
- Summary: ...
- Category: architecture|implementation|issues|patterns
- Importance: high|medium|low
(CLI fallback: `node ./.claude/skills/memory/cli.js write --title "..." --summary "..." --category "..." --importance "..."`.)
This step is SILENT - auto-saves significant decisions.
Exit: Tests pass, no review findings, suggestions addressed
Phase 2: Deployment (AUTONOMOUS)
Skip if no deployment required.
Step 2.1: Deploy
Deploy to target environment
Step 2.2: Test Loop
Run deployment tests
IF fail:
Analyze and fix if clear
GOTO Step 2.1
Step 2.3: Review + Auto-Fix
Run reviewer skill
FIXES AUTOMATICALLY
IF fixes made: GOTO Step 2.2
Step 2.4: Commit
Run commit-pr skill
Ensure git-privacy rules followed
Exit: Deployment tests pass, no findings, committed
Phase 3: Pull Request (to dev)
PRs go to dev branch, NOT main.
Step 3.1: Create PR to dev
Run commit-pr skill
MUST use: gh pr create --base dev
NEVER: gh pr create --base main (unless releasing)
Step 3.2: Review + Auto-Fix (in temp folder)
TEMP_DIR=$(mktemp -d)
cd "$TEMP_DIR"
# gh pr checkout requires an existing git clone. Clone first:
gh repo clone OWNER/REPO repo
cd repo
gh pr checkout <PR-number>
Run reviewer skill (post-PR stage)
- Run project linters (Ansible, HELM, etc.)
- FIXES AUTOMATICALLY
- Push fixes to PR branch
IF fixes made: GOTO Step 3.2 (re-review)
IF needs human: PAUSE
IF clean: Continue
Required behavior (closed-loop):
- Stage 3 MUST be executed by a dedicated reviewer subagent (preferred:
@Reviewervia Task tool). - Reviewer Stage 3 MUST loop until the PR is clean:
- If findings exist: fix + push commits to the PR branch, then restart Stage 3 in a fresh temp checkout.
- When clean: post
ICC-REVIEW-RECEIPTwithFindings: 0andNO FINDINGSfor the current head SHA. - Optional GitHub approvals (GitHub-style approvals mode):
- Default is self-review-and-merge: GitHub required approvals may remain at 0, while ICC Stage 3 receipt remains the required review gate.
- If
workflow.require_github_approval=true, the reviewer subagent should also try to add a GitHub approval usinggh pr review <PR-number> --approve ...(skip if already approved).- If PR author == current authenticated
ghuser: GitHub forbids approving your own PR (server-side rule). Skip. If repo rules require approvals, a second GitHub identity/bot is required for approvals.
- If PR author == current authenticated
Step 3.3: Suggest + Auto-Implement
Run suggest skill on full PR diff
- AUTO-IMPLEMENTS safe improvements
- Push to PR branch
- PRESENTS risky ones to user
IF auto-implemented: GOTO Step 3.2 (re-review)
IF needs human: PAUSE, wait for decision
IF clean or user says proceed: Continue
Step 3.4: Merge Approval (Default: Pause, Optional Auto-Merge)
Default behavior:
WAIT for explicit user approval
DO NOT merge without: "merge", "approve", "LGTM", or similar
Optional auto-merge (Skills-level standing approval):
- If
workflow.auto_merge=truein the current AgentTask/workflow context - AND the PR targets
dev - AND the reviewer Stage 3 ICC-REVIEW receipt exists for the current head SHA (PASS)
- AND the receipt includes
Findings: 0andNO FINDINGS - AND checks are green
Then the agent MAY proceed to merge without an additional chat approval.
Never auto-merge to main unless performing an explicitly requested release workflow.
Exit: No findings, suggestions addressed, user approved, merged to dev
Phase 4: Release (dev → main)
Only when user explicitly requests a release.
Step 4.1: Verify dev is stable
Ensure dev branch:
- All tests pass
- No pending critical issues
- User confirms ready for release
Step 4.2: Create Release PR
gh pr create --base main --title "release: vX.Y.Z"
Include release notes and changelog
Step 4.3: Await Release Approval
WAIT for explicit user approval
User must say "release", "merge to main", or similar
Step 4.4: Tag and Publish
After merge to main:
git tag vX.Y.Z
git push origin vX.Y.Z
gh release create vX.Y.Z
Exit: Released to main, tagged, published
Quality Gates (BLOCKING)
These gates are MANDATORY. You CANNOT proceed without passing them.
| Gate | Requirement | Blocked Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-commit | Tests pass + reviewer skill clean | git commit, git push |
| Pre-deploy | Tests pass + reviewer skill clean | Deploy to production |
| Pre-merge | reviewer Stage 3 PASS receipt + checks green + user approval | gh pr merge |
Gate Enforcement
IF attempting commit/push/PR without running reviewer skill:
STOP - You are violating the process
GO BACK to Step 1.3 (Review + Auto-Fix)
DO NOT proceed until reviewer skill passes
Skipping review is a process violation, not a shortcut.
When to Pause
PAUSE for:
- Architectural decisions affecting multiple components
- Ambiguous requirements needing clarification
- Multiple valid approaches with trade-offs
- High-risk changes that could break things
- Merge approval (always)
DO NOT pause for:
- Fixing typos, formatting, naming
- Adding missing error handling
- Fixing security vulnerabilities
- Moving misplaced files
- Removing unused code
- Extracting duplicated code
- Adding null checks
Commands
Start (runs autonomously):
process skill
Force pause at every step (L1 mode):
process skill with L1 autonomy
Check status:
Where am I in the process?
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.