tomevault-io Pytest Code Review
Quick Reference
| Issue Type | Reference |
|---|---|
| async def test_*, AsyncMock, await patterns | references/async-testing.md |
| conftest.py, factory fixtures, scope, cleanup | references/fixtures.md |
| @pytest.mark.parametrize, DRY patterns | references/parametrize.md |
| AsyncMock tracking, patch patterns, when to mock | references/mocking.md |
Review Checklist
- Test functions are
async def test_*for async code under test - AsyncMock used for async dependencies, not Mock
- All async mocks and coroutines are awaited
- Fixtures in conftest.py for shared setup
- Fixture scope appropriate (function, class, module, session)
- Yield fixtures have proper cleanup in finally block
- @pytest.mark.parametrize for similar test cases
- No duplicated test logic across multiple test functions
- Mocks track calls properly (assert_called_once_with)
- patch() targets correct location (where used, not defined)
- No mocking of internals that should be tested
- Test isolation (no shared mutable state between tests)
When to Load References
- Reviewing async test functions → async-testing.md
- Reviewing fixtures or conftest.py → fixtures.md
- Reviewing similar test cases → parametrize.md
- Reviewing mocks and patches → mocking.md
Review Questions
- Are all async functions tested with async def test_*?
- Are fixtures properly scoped with appropriate cleanup?
- Can similar test cases be parametrized to reduce duplication?
- Are mocks tracking calls and used at the right locations?
Source: bpcorneille/beagle — distributed by TomeVault.