RAG Architect
Core Workflow
- Requirements Analysis — Identify retrieval needs, latency constraints, accuracy requirements, and scale
- Vector Store Design — Select database, schema design, indexing strategy, sharding approach
- Chunking Strategy — Document splitting, overlap, semantic boundaries, metadata enrichment
- Retrieval Pipeline — Embedding selection, query transformation, hybrid search, reranking
- Evaluation & Iteration — Metrics tracking, retrieval debugging, continuous optimization
For each step, validate before moving on (see checkpoints below).
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic |
Reference |
Load When |
| Vector Databases |
references/vector-databases.md |
Comparing Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma, pgvector, Qdrant |
| Embedding Models |
references/embedding-models.md |
Selecting embeddings, fine-tuning, dimension trade-offs |
| Chunking Strategies |
references/chunking-strategies.md |
Document splitting, overlap, semantic chunking |
| Retrieval Optimization |
references/retrieval-optimization.md |
Hybrid search, reranking, query expansion, filtering |
| RAG Evaluation |
references/rag-evaluation.md |
Metrics, evaluation frameworks, debugging retrieval |
Implementation Examples
1. Chunking Documents
from langchain.text_splitter import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter
# Evaluate chunk_size on your domain data — never use 512 blindly
splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(
chunk_size=800,
chunk_overlap=100,
separators=["\n\n", "\n", ". ", " "],
)
chunks = splitter.create_documents(
texts=[doc.page_content for doc in raw_docs],
metadatas=[{"source": doc.metadata["source"], "timestamp": doc.metadata.get("timestamp")} for doc in raw_docs],
)
Checkpoint: assert all(c.metadata.get("source") for c in chunks), "Missing source metadata"
2. Generating Embeddings & Indexing
from openai import OpenAI
import qdrant_client
from qdrant_client.models import VectorParams, Distance, PointStruct
client = OpenAI()
qdrant = qdrant_client.QdrantClient("localhost", port=6333)
# Create collection
qdrant.recreate_collection(
collection_name="knowledge_base",
vectors_config=VectorParams(size=1536, distance=Distance.COSINE),
)
def embed_chunks(chunks: list[str], model: str = "text-embedding-3-small") -> list[list[float]]:
response = client.embeddings.create(input=chunks, model=model)
return [r.embedding for r in response.data]
# Idempotent upsert with deduplication via deterministic IDs
import hashlib, uuid
points = []
for i, chunk in enumerate(chunks):
doc_id = str(uuid.UUID(hashlib.md5(chunk.page_content.encode()).hexdigest()))
embedding = embed_chunks([chunk.page_content])[0]
points.append(PointStruct(id=doc_id, vector=embedding, payload=chunk.metadata))
qdrant.upsert(collection_name="knowledge_base", points=points)
Checkpoint: assert qdrant.count("knowledge_base").count == len(set(p.id for p in points)), "Deduplication failed"
3. Hybrid Search (Vector + BM25)
from qdrant_client.models import Filter, FieldCondition, MatchValue, SparseVector
from rank_bm25 import BM25Okapi
def hybrid_search(query: str, tenant_id: str, top_k: int = 20) -> list:
# Dense retrieval
query_embedding = embed_chunks([query])[0]
tenant_filter = Filter(must=[FieldCondition(key="tenant_id", match=MatchValue(value=tenant_id))])
dense_results = qdrant.search(
collection_name="knowledge_base",
query_vector=query_embedding,
query_filter=tenant_filter,
limit=top_k,
)
# Sparse retrieval (BM25)
corpus = [r.payload.get("text", "") for r in dense_results]
bm25 = BM25Okapi([doc.split() for doc in corpus])
bm25_scores = bm25.get_scores(query.split())
# Reciprocal Rank Fusion
ranked = sorted(
zip(dense_results, bm25_scores),
key=lambda x: 0.6 * x[0].score + 0.4 * x[1],
reverse=True,
)
return [r for r, _ in ranked[:top_k]]
Checkpoint: assert len(hybrid_search("test query", tenant_id="demo")) > 0, "Hybrid search returned no results"
4. Reranking Top-K Results
import cohere
co = cohere.Client("YOUR_API_KEY")
def rerank(query: str, results: list, top_n: int = 5) -> list:
docs = [r.payload.get("text", "") for r in results]
reranked = co.rerank(query=query, documents=docs, top_n=top_n, model="rerank-english-v3.0")
return [results[r.index] for r in reranked.results]
5. Retrieval Evaluation
# Run precision@k and recall@k against a labeled evaluation set
# python evaluate.py --metrics precision@10 recall@10 mrr --collection knowledge_base
from ragas import evaluate
from ragas.metrics import context_precision, context_recall, faithfulness, answer_relevancy
from datasets import Dataset
eval_dataset = Dataset.from_dict({
"question": questions,
"contexts": retrieved_contexts,
"answer": generated_answers,
"ground_truth": ground_truth_answers,
})
results = evaluate(eval_dataset, metrics=[context_precision, context_recall, faithfulness, answer_relevancy])
print(results)
Checkpoint: Target context_precision >= 0.7 and context_recall >= 0.6 before moving to LLM integration.
Constraints
MUST DO
- Evaluate multiple embedding models on your domain data before committing
- Implement hybrid search (vector + keyword) for production systems
- Add metadata filters for multi-tenant or domain-specific retrieval
- Measure retrieval metrics (precision@k, recall@k, MRR, NDCG)
- Use reranking for top-k results before passing context to LLM
- Implement idempotent ingestion with deduplication (deterministic IDs)
- Monitor retrieval latency and quality over time
- Version embeddings and plan for model migration
MUST NOT DO
- Use default chunk size (512) without evaluation on your domain data
- Skip metadata enrichment (source, timestamp, section)
- Ignore retrieval quality metrics in favor of only LLM output quality
- Store raw documents without preprocessing/cleaning
- Use cosine similarity alone for complex multi-domain retrieval
- Deploy without testing on production-like data volumes
- Forget to handle edge cases (empty results, malformed docs)
- Couple the embedding model tightly to application code
Output Templates
When designing RAG architecture, deliver:
- System architecture diagram (ingestion + retrieval pipelines)
- Vector database selection with trade-off analysis
- Chunking strategy with examples and rationale
- Retrieval pipeline design (query → results flow)
- Evaluation plan with metrics, benchmarks, and pass/fail thresholds
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.
1---2name: rag-architect3description: Designs and implements production-grade RAG systems by chunking documents, generating embeddings, configuring vector stores, building hybrid search pipelines, applying reranking, and evaluating retrieval quality. Use when building RAG systems, vector databases, or knowledge-grounded AI applications requiring semantic search, document retrieval, context augmentation, similarity search, or embedding-based indexing. Use when this capability is needed.4---56# RAG Architect78## Core Workflow9101. **Requirements Analysis** — Identify retrieval needs, latency constraints, accuracy requirements, and scale112. **Vector Store Design** — Select database, schema design, indexing strategy, sharding approach123. **Chunking Strategy** — Document splitting, overlap, semantic boundaries, metadata enrichment134. **Retrieval Pipeline** — Embedding selection, query transformation, hybrid search, reranking145. **Evaluation & Iteration** — Metrics tracking, retrieval debugging, continuous optimization1516For each step, validate before moving on (see checkpoints below).1718## Reference Guide1920Load detailed guidance based on context:2122| Topic | Reference | Load When |23|-------|-----------|-----------|24| Vector Databases | `references/vector-databases.md` | Comparing Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma, pgvector, Qdrant |25| Embedding Models | `references/embedding-models.md` | Selecting embeddings, fine-tuning, dimension trade-offs |26| Chunking Strategies | `references/chunking-strategies.md` | Document splitting, overlap, semantic chunking |27| Retrieval Optimization | `references/retrieval-optimization.md` | Hybrid search, reranking, query expansion, filtering |28| RAG Evaluation | `references/rag-evaluation.md` | Metrics, evaluation frameworks, debugging retrieval |2930## Implementation Examples3132### 1. Chunking Documents3334```python35from langchain.text_splitter import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter3637# Evaluate chunk_size on your domain data — never use 512 blindly38splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(39 chunk_size=800,40 chunk_overlap=100,41 separators=["\n\n", "\n", ". ", " "],42)4344chunks = splitter.create_documents(45 texts=[doc.page_content for doc in raw_docs],46 metadatas=[{"source": doc.metadata["source"], "timestamp": doc.metadata.get("timestamp")} for doc in raw_docs],47)48```4950**Checkpoint:** `assert all(c.metadata.get("source") for c in chunks), "Missing source metadata"`5152### 2. Generating Embeddings & Indexing5354```python55from openai import OpenAI56import qdrant_client57from qdrant_client.models import VectorParams, Distance, PointStruct5859client = OpenAI()60qdrant = qdrant_client.QdrantClient("localhost", port=6333)6162# Create collection63qdrant.recreate_collection(64 collection_name="knowledge_base",65 vectors_config=VectorParams(size=1536, distance=Distance.COSINE),66)6768def embed_chunks(chunks: list[str], model: str = "text-embedding-3-small") -> list[list[float]]:69 response = client.embeddings.create(input=chunks, model=model)70 return [r.embedding for r in response.data]7172# Idempotent upsert with deduplication via deterministic IDs73import hashlib, uuid7475points = []76for i, chunk in enumerate(chunks):77 doc_id = str(uuid.UUID(hashlib.md5(chunk.page_content.encode()).hexdigest()))78 embedding = embed_chunks([chunk.page_content])[0]79 points.append(PointStruct(id=doc_id, vector=embedding, payload=chunk.metadata))8081qdrant.upsert(collection_name="knowledge_base", points=points)82```8384**Checkpoint:** `assert qdrant.count("knowledge_base").count == len(set(p.id for p in points)), "Deduplication failed"`8586### 3. Hybrid Search (Vector + BM25)8788```python89from qdrant_client.models import Filter, FieldCondition, MatchValue, SparseVector90from rank_bm25 import BM25Okapi9192def hybrid_search(query: str, tenant_id: str, top_k: int = 20) -> list:93 # Dense retrieval94 query_embedding = embed_chunks([query])[0]95 tenant_filter = Filter(must=[FieldCondition(key="tenant_id", match=MatchValue(value=tenant_id))])96 dense_results = qdrant.search(97 collection_name="knowledge_base",98 query_vector=query_embedding,99 query_filter=tenant_filter,100 limit=top_k,101 )102103 # Sparse retrieval (BM25)104 corpus = [r.payload.get("text", "") for r in dense_results]105 bm25 = BM25Okapi([doc.split() for doc in corpus])106 bm25_scores = bm25.get_scores(query.split())107108 # Reciprocal Rank Fusion109 ranked = sorted(110 zip(dense_results, bm25_scores),111 key=lambda x: 0.6 * x[0].score + 0.4 * x[1],112 reverse=True,113 )114 return [r for r, _ in ranked[:top_k]]115```116117**Checkpoint:** `assert len(hybrid_search("test query", tenant_id="demo")) > 0, "Hybrid search returned no results"`118119### 4. Reranking Top-K Results120121```python122import cohere123124co = cohere.Client("YOUR_API_KEY")125126def rerank(query: str, results: list, top_n: int = 5) -> list:127 docs = [r.payload.get("text", "") for r in results]128 reranked = co.rerank(query=query, documents=docs, top_n=top_n, model="rerank-english-v3.0")129 return [results[r.index] for r in reranked.results]130```131132### 5. Retrieval Evaluation133134```python135# Run precision@k and recall@k against a labeled evaluation set136# python evaluate.py --metrics precision@10 recall@10 mrr --collection knowledge_base137138from ragas import evaluate139from ragas.metrics import context_precision, context_recall, faithfulness, answer_relevancy140from datasets import Dataset141142eval_dataset = Dataset.from_dict({143 "question": questions,144 "contexts": retrieved_contexts,145 "answer": generated_answers,146 "ground_truth": ground_truth_answers,147})148149results = evaluate(eval_dataset, metrics=[context_precision, context_recall, faithfulness, answer_relevancy])150print(results)151```152153**Checkpoint:** Target `context_precision >= 0.7` and `context_recall >= 0.6` before moving to LLM integration.154155## Constraints156157### MUST DO158- Evaluate multiple embedding models on your domain data before committing159- Implement hybrid search (vector + keyword) for production systems160- Add metadata filters for multi-tenant or domain-specific retrieval161- Measure retrieval metrics (precision@k, recall@k, MRR, NDCG)162- Use reranking for top-k results before passing context to LLM163- Implement idempotent ingestion with deduplication (deterministic IDs)164- Monitor retrieval latency and quality over time165- Version embeddings and plan for model migration166167### MUST NOT DO168- Use default chunk size (512) without evaluation on your domain data169- Skip metadata enrichment (source, timestamp, section)170- Ignore retrieval quality metrics in favor of only LLM output quality171- Store raw documents without preprocessing/cleaning172- Use cosine similarity alone for complex multi-domain retrieval173- Deploy without testing on production-like data volumes174- Forget to handle edge cases (empty results, malformed docs)175- Couple the embedding model tightly to application code176177## Output Templates178179When designing RAG architecture, deliver:1801. System architecture diagram (ingestion + retrieval pipelines)1812. Vector database selection with trade-off analysis1823. Chunking strategy with examples and rationale1834. Retrieval pipeline design (query → results flow)1845. Evaluation plan with metrics, benchmarks, and pass/fail thresholds185186---187> Converted and distributed by [TomeVault](https://tomevault.io/claim/jeffallan) — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.188<!-- tomevault:4.0:skill_md:2026-04-11 -->