Resolve Review

Resolve Review

Run the workflow that fetches and applies bot reviewer comments on the current branch's PR. This skill is not tied to a specific bot; it auto-detects whichever bot reviewers are present on the PR.

Workflow

1. Check the PR

gh pr view --json number,url

• Confirm there is a PR linked to the current branch.
• If there is no PR: print "No pull request is linked to the current branch." and stop.
• Do not pre-check for a specific bot. Which bot reviewers left comments is determined by the collection step below.

2. Collect review comments

.agents/scripts/get-review-comments.sh

• This script collects review and inline comments from bot reviewers using user.type == "Bot" (works for any bot: gemini-code-assist, coderabbitai, copilot, etc.).
• Organize comments by file path, line number, the issue raised, and the author (user.login).
• Record each inline comment's id (comment_id) — it is used in step 5 to reply to that thread.
• If both Reviews and Inline Comments are empty: print "No bot reviewer comments found." and stop.
• If the review state is only APPROVED with no inline comments: print "The review is already approved." and stop.

3. Classify the comments

Classify each comment using the criteria below:

• For items that conflict with project conventions or need intent clarification, ask the user in the terminal before modifying.

4. Apply code fixes

• Modify the code for each actionable comment, by file/line.
• Follow the code conventions in AGENTS.md (code style, architecture, component conventions, etc.).
• After editing, Claude hooks automatically run ESLint + Prettier.

5. Reply to each review comment thread

Do not leave a single summary comment on the PR body. Instead, reply individually to each inline comment thread (comment_id) collected in step 2.

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments/{comment_id}/replies \
  -f body="@{reviewer} ..."

• Build {reviewer} dynamically from the comment author (user.login) with the [bot] suffix stripped. (e.g. gemini-code-assist[bot] → @gemini-code-assist, coderabbitai[bot] → @coderabbitai) Never hardcode a specific bot name.
• Every reply starts with the corresponding reviewer mention.
• For each comment, write one of:
  • If fixed: what was changed and how, plus the commit hash.
  • If skipped: the reason for skipping.
• Even if the same issue repeats across multiple files, reply on each comment thread for that file.

Reply format example:

@{reviewer} Thanks for the feedback. Fixed by {summary of change}. (commit {commit_hash})

Notes

• When multiple comments target the same file, edit from the bottom line upward (reverse order).
• If a type error occurs during edits, stop immediately and report the cause to the user.
• Report results only as replies on each review comment thread, not as a summary comment on the PR body.
• Always generate the reply mention from the comment author dynamically; never assume a specific bot name.

Source: team-incube/Flooding-Client-V2 — distributed by TomeVault.