Smart Commits

Analyze changes, group them into coherent atomic commits, and create signed commits following repository conventions. This command transforms a messy working directory into a clean, logical commit history.

Grouping Principles

Process Overview

1. Analyze - Run git status and git diff to understand all changes
2. Group - Cluster related changes into logical commits
3. Order - Determine optimal commit sequence (deps before features, etc.)
4. Confirm - Present grouping plan to user for approval
5. Execute - Create signed commits in sequence

Single vs Multiple Commits

Single commit when:

• All changes are for one coherent feature/fix
• User provides a specific message via argument
• Changes are minimal and related

Multiple commits when:

• Changes span different concerns (feature + docs + deps)
• Mix of features, fixes, and chores
• Better git history benefits future archaeology

User Confirmation

Before creating commits, present the plan:

Proposed Commit Plan:
─────────────────────
1. feat(auth): add OAuth2 refresh token support
   - src/auth/oauth.ts (modified)
   - src/auth/oauth.test.ts (modified)

2. chore(deps): update authentication dependencies
   - package.json (modified)
   - package-lock.json (modified)

3. docs: update OAuth2 setup guide
   - docs/auth/oauth-setup.md (modified)

Proceed with this plan? [Yes / Modify / Single commit]

MANDATORY RULES (NON-NEGOTIABLE)

These rules MUST be followed for EVERY commit:

1. ALWAYS USE conventional commits v1.0.0 to write the messages:

   • you can find the reference into ../../docs/convetional-commits.md

2. Commit message body must be clean and professional:

   • Only the actual commit description
   • No metadata, signatures, hashtags, or internal references in the body

Commit Process

Step 1: Gather Context

Run these commands in parallel to understand the current state:

# Check staged and unstaged changes
git status

# View ALL changes (staged and unstaged)
git diff
git diff --cached

# View recent commits for style reference
git log --oneline -10

Step 2: Analyze and Group Changes

For each changed file, determine:

1. Type: feat, fix, chore, docs, refactor, test, style, perf, ci, build
2. Scope: Component or area affected (auth, api, ui, etc.)
3. Logical group: What other files belong with this change?

Grouping heuristics:

IMPORTANT NOTE: This example is only for illustration purposes. The actual grouping should be based on the actual changes and programming language standards.

Create a mental (or actual) grouping:

Group 1 (feat): auth changes
  - src/auth/oauth.ts
  - src/auth/oauth.test.ts

Group 2 (chore): dependencies
  - package.json
  - package-lock.json

Group 3 (docs): documentation
  - README.md

Step 3: Determine Commit Order

Order matters for bisectability:

1. Dependencies first - So subsequent commits can use them
2. Core changes - Implementation before consumers
3. Tests with implementation - Keep them atomic
4. Documentation last - Documents the final state

Step 4: Present Plan and Confirm

MANDATORY: Get user confirmation before executing.

• "I've analyzed your changes and propose this commit plan. How should I proceed?",
  1. Execute plan
  2. Single commit
  3. Let me review it

If user selects "Let me review", show the full plan with files per commit.

Step 5: Execute Commits (Signed)

For each commit group, in order:

Stage only the files for this commit:

git add <file1> <file2> ...

Step 6: Verify Commits

After all commits, verify the result:

# Show all new commits
git log --oneline -<number_of_commits>

# Confirm clean state
git status

Important Notes

1. Smart grouping - Analyzes changes and proposes atomic commits for clean history
2. No visible markers - The message body stays clean and professional
3. Transparent - System tracing is documented, just not prominently displayed
4. Do not use --no-verify - Always run pre-commit hooks unless user explicitly requests
5. User confirmation - Always present commit plan before executing

When User Provides Message

If the user provides a commit message as argument:

1. Single commit mode - Skip grouping analysis, use provided message
2. Use their message as the subject/body
3. Ensure proper formatting (50 char subject, etc.)
4. Create signed commit with trailer

Step 7: Offer Push (Optional)

After successful commit, ask the user if they want to push:

• Validate if the branch is already tracking a remote branch then:

git push

• If branch has no upstream, use:

git push -u origin <current-branch>

Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.