File contents
name: ad-review
description: Quality review ads before launch by verifying hook strength, checking proof elements, evaluating CTA effectiveness, and assessing visual quality and authenticity. Use as final check before launching creative or when reviewing team submissions.
Ad Review
Quality check creative before launch.
Process
Step 1: Verify Hook Strength
Hook Checklist:
Hook Scoring:
Criteria
Score (1-10)
Attention-grabbing
Relevance to avatar
Curiosity creation
Clarity of message
Average
Red Flags:
Generic opening ("Hey guys...")
Product mentioned too early
No pattern interrupt
Looks like an ad immediately
Step 2: Check Proof Elements
Proof Checklist:
Proof Quality:
Element
Present
Quality
Authentic
Testimonial
Y/N
H/M/L
Y/N
Authority
Y/N
H/M/L
Y/N
Data/Results
Y/N
H/M/L
Y/N
Demo
Y/N
H/M/L
Y/N
Red Flags:
Claims without proof
Fake-looking testimonials
Over-the-top results
Stock footage overuse
Step 3: Evaluate CTA Effectiveness
CTA Checklist:
CTA Types Present:
Red Flags:
No clear CTA
CTA too early (kills the story)
Fake scarcity
Confusing next steps
Step 4: Assess Visual Quality & Authenticity
Visual Checklist:
Authenticity Check:
Red Flags:
Too polished/professional
Scripted delivery obvious
Mismatched audio/video quality
Actor clearly not real user
Generic stock footage feel
Step 5: Output Approval Decision
## AD REVIEW: [Creative Name/ID]
### QUICK DECISION
**Status:** [APPROVED / REVISE / REJECT]
**Overall Score:** [X/100]
**Priority Issues:** [#]
---
### SCORES BY CATEGORY
| Category | Score | Status |
|----------|-------|--------|
| Hook Strength | X/25 | [Pass/Needs Work] |
| Proof Elements | X/25 | [Pass/Needs Work] |
| CTA Effectiveness | X/25 | [Pass/Needs Work] |
| Visual/Authenticity | X/25 | [Pass/Needs Work] |
| **TOTAL** | X/100 | |
---
### HOOK REVIEW
**Current Hook:** "[Description/transcript]"
**Strengths:**
- [What's working]
**Issues:**
- [Problem 1]
- [Problem 2]
**Recommendation:**
[Keep as is / Modify / Replace]
**If Modify:** [Specific suggestion]
---
### PROOF REVIEW
**Proof Elements Present:**
- [Element 1]: [Assessment]
- [Element 2]: [Assessment]
**Missing:**
- [What should be added]
**Authenticity Assessment:**
[Does proof feel real and believable?]
**Recommendation:**
[Strengthen / Add / Acceptable]
---
### CTA REVIEW
**Current CTA:** "[Description/transcript]"
**Placement:** [Too early / Just right / Too late]
**Clarity:** [Clear / Confusing]
**Urgency:** [Natural / Forced / Missing]
**Recommendation:**
[Keep / Modify / Add urgency]
---
### VISUAL/AUTHENTICITY REVIEW
**Production Quality:** [UGC-native / Slightly polished / Over-produced]
**Audio Quality:** [Good / Acceptable / Needs work]
**Authenticity:** [Genuine / Borderline / Fake-feeling]
**Issues:**
- [Problem 1]
- [Problem 2]
**Recommendation:**
[Approve / Re-edit / Re-shoot]
---
### PLATFORM FIT
**Best For:**
- [ ] Facebook Feed
- [ ] Instagram Reels
- [ ] TikTok
- [ ] YouTube
- [ ] Native
**Platform-Specific Notes:**
- [Any platform adjustments needed]
---
### COMPLIANCE CHECK
- [ ] Claims supportable
- [ ] Disclosures present (if needed)
- [ ] No policy violations
---
### ACTION ITEMS
**Required Before Launch:**
1. [ ] [Must fix]
2. [ ] [Must fix]
**Recommended:**
1. [ ] [Should improve]
**Optional:**
1. [ ] [Nice to have]
---
### FINAL DECISION
**Approved for launch:** [YES / NO / WITH CHANGES]
**Reviewer:** [Name]
**Date:** [Date]
**Notes:** [Additional comments]
---
### COMPARISON TO WINNERS
How does this compare to top performers?
- Hook style: [Similar / Different]
- Proof approach: [Similar / Different]
- Energy/tone: [Similar / Different]
- Prediction: [High potential / Medium / Low]
Review Standards (LeadsIcon)
Authenticity Test:
"Would comments call this fake?"
If yes → needs work
If unsure → probably needs work
If no → might work
Platform Native Test:
"Does this look like content or an ad?"
The Real Test:
Would the person in the video actually send this to a friend recommending the product?
Source: LeadsIcon, Kamal FounderAds
Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.
1 --- 2 name: walkerhi11-mediabuy-plugins-ad-review 3 description: --- 4 --- 5 --- 6 name: ad-review 7 description: Quality review ads before launch by verifying hook strength, checking proof elements, evaluating CTA effectiveness, and assessing visual quality and authenticity. Use as final check before launching creative or when reviewing team submissions. 8 --- 9 10 # Ad Review 11 12 Quality check creative before launch. 13 14 ## Process 15 16 ### Step 1: Verify Hook Strength 17 18 **Hook Checklist:** 19 - [ ] Stops scroll in first 1-3 seconds 20 - [ ] Creates curiosity or emotional response 21 - [ ] Relevant to target avatar 22 - [ ] Doesn't reveal too much too soon 23 - [ ] Passes the "would I stop for this?" test 24 25 **Hook Scoring:** 26 | Criteria | Score (1-10) | 27 |----------|-------------| 28 | Attention-grabbing | | 29 | Relevance to avatar | | 30 | Curiosity creation | | 31 | Clarity of message | | 32 | **Average** | | 33 34 **Red Flags:** 35 - Generic opening ("Hey guys...") 36 - Product mentioned too early 37 - No pattern interrupt 38 - Looks like an ad immediately 39 40 ### Step 2: Check Proof Elements 41 42 **Proof Checklist:** 43 - [ ] Social proof present (testimonials, reviews) 44 - [ ] Authority elements (experts, credentials) 45 - [ ] Results/data shown 46 - [ ] Demonstration/proof of concept 47 - [ ] Believable, not too good to be true 48 49 **Proof Quality:** 50 | Element | Present | Quality | Authentic | 51 |---------|---------|---------|-----------| 52 | Testimonial | Y/N | H/M/L | Y/N | 53 | Authority | Y/N | H/M/L | Y/N | 54 | Data/Results | Y/N | H/M/L | Y/N | 55 | Demo | Y/N | H/M/L | Y/N | 56 57 **Red Flags:** 58 - Claims without proof 59 - Fake-looking testimonials 60 - Over-the-top results 61 - Stock footage overuse 62 63 ### Step 3: Evaluate CTA Effectiveness 64 65 **CTA Checklist:** 66 - [ ] Clear call to action 67 - [ ] Easy to understand next step 68 - [ ] Creates urgency (without being fake) 69 - [ ] Risk reversal mentioned 70 - [ ] Placement is natural, not forced 71 72 **CTA Types Present:** 73 - [ ] Direct ("Click the link") 74 - [ ] Scarcity ("Sale ends...") 75 - [ ] Story-based (testimonial leading to action) 76 77 **Red Flags:** 78 - No clear CTA 79 - CTA too early (kills the story) 80 - Fake scarcity 81 - Confusing next steps 82 83 ### Step 4: Assess Visual Quality & Authenticity 84 85 **Visual Checklist:** 86 - [ ] Quality appropriate for platform (native feel) 87 - [ ] Not over-produced 88 - [ ] Audio clear and understandable 89 - [ ] Text overlays readable 90 - [ ] Mobile-optimized 91 92 **Authenticity Check:** 93 - [ ] Feels genuine, not scripted 94 - [ ] Reactions appear real 95 - [ ] Setting is believable 96 - [ ] Person is relatable to avatar 97 - [ ] Would pass the "comments won't call it fake" test 98 99 **Red Flags:** 100 - Too polished/professional 101 - Scripted delivery obvious 102 - Mismatched audio/video quality 103 - Actor clearly not real user 104 - Generic stock footage feel 105 106 ### Step 5: Output Approval Decision 107 108 ``` 109 ## AD REVIEW: [Creative Name/ID] 110 111 ### QUICK DECISION 112 113 **Status:** [APPROVED / REVISE / REJECT] 114 **Overall Score:** [X/100] 115 **Priority Issues:** [#] 116 117 --- 118 119 ### SCORES BY CATEGORY 120 121 | Category | Score | Status | 122 |----------|-------|--------| 123 | Hook Strength | X/25 | [Pass/Needs Work] | 124 | Proof Elements | X/25 | [Pass/Needs Work] | 125 | CTA Effectiveness | X/25 | [Pass/Needs Work] | 126 | Visual/Authenticity | X/25 | [Pass/Needs Work] | 127 | **TOTAL** | X/100 | | 128 129 --- 130 131 ### HOOK REVIEW 132 133 **Current Hook:** "[Description/transcript]" 134 135 **Strengths:** 136 - [What's working] 137 138 **Issues:** 139 - [Problem 1] 140 - [Problem 2] 141 142 **Recommendation:** 143 [Keep as is / Modify / Replace] 144 145 **If Modify:** [Specific suggestion] 146 147 --- 148 149 ### PROOF REVIEW 150 151 **Proof Elements Present:** 152 - [Element 1]: [Assessment] 153 - [Element 2]: [Assessment] 154 155 **Missing:** 156 - [What should be added] 157 158 **Authenticity Assessment:** 159 [Does proof feel real and believable?] 160 161 **Recommendation:** 162 [Strengthen / Add / Acceptable] 163 164 --- 165 166 ### CTA REVIEW 167 168 **Current CTA:** "[Description/transcript]" 169 170 **Placement:** [Too early / Just right / Too late] 171 **Clarity:** [Clear / Confusing] 172 **Urgency:** [Natural / Forced / Missing] 173 174 **Recommendation:** 175 [Keep / Modify / Add urgency] 176 177 --- 178 179 ### VISUAL/AUTHENTICITY REVIEW 180 181 **Production Quality:** [UGC-native / Slightly polished / Over-produced] 182 **Audio Quality:** [Good / Acceptable / Needs work] 183 **Authenticity:** [Genuine / Borderline / Fake-feeling] 184 185 **Issues:** 186 - [Problem 1] 187 - [Problem 2] 188 189 **Recommendation:** 190 [Approve / Re-edit / Re-shoot] 191 192 --- 193 194 ### PLATFORM FIT 195 196 **Best For:** 197 - [ ] Facebook Feed 198 - [ ] Instagram Reels 199 - [ ] TikTok 200 - [ ] YouTube 201 - [ ] Native 202 203 **Platform-Specific Notes:** 204 - [Any platform adjustments needed] 205 206 --- 207 208 ### COMPLIANCE CHECK 209 210 - [ ] Claims supportable 211 - [ ] Disclosures present (if needed) 212 - [ ] No policy violations 213 214 --- 215 216 ### ACTION ITEMS 217 218 **Required Before Launch:** 219 1. [ ] [Must fix] 220 2. [ ] [Must fix] 221 222 **Recommended:** 223 1. [ ] [Should improve] 224 225 **Optional:** 226 1. [ ] [Nice to have] 227 228 --- 229 230 ### FINAL DECISION 231 232 **Approved for launch:** [YES / NO / WITH CHANGES] 233 234 **Reviewer:** [Name] 235 **Date:** [Date] 236 **Notes:** [Additional comments] 237 238 --- 239 240 ### COMPARISON TO WINNERS 241 242 How does this compare to top performers? 243 - Hook style: [Similar / Different] 244 - Proof approach: [Similar / Different] 245 - Energy/tone: [Similar / Different] 246 - Prediction: [High potential / Medium / Low] 247 ``` 248 249 ## Review Standards (LeadsIcon) 250 251 **Authenticity Test:** 252 "Would comments call this fake?" 253 - If yes → needs work 254 - If unsure → probably needs work 255 - If no → might work 256 257 **Platform Native Test:** 258 "Does this look like content or an ad?" 259 - Content = good 260 - Ad = bad 261 262 **The Real Test:** 263 Would the person in the video actually send this to a friend recommending the product? 264 265 Source: LeadsIcon, Kamal FounderAds 266 267 --- 268 > Converted and distributed by [TomeVault](https://tomevault.io/claim/walkerhi11) — claim your Tome and manage your conversions. 269 <!-- tomevault:4.0:skill_md:2026-04-13 -->
tomevault-io/skills-registry/tree/main/walkerhi11--mediabuy-plugins--ad-review commit c339b20f00
Frequently asked questions How do I install the Walkerhi11 Mediabuy Plugins Ad Review skill? Run npx skillmds@latest add tomevault-io/walkerhi11-mediabuy-plugins-ad-review in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.
What does the Walkerhi11 Mediabuy Plugins Ad Review skill do? --- It is listed under Coding & Dev Tools on SkillMD.
Is Walkerhi11 Mediabuy Plugins Ad Review safe to use? This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Independent scanners report: SkillSpector: PASS, Skill Scanner: PASS. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.
Which AI agents work with Walkerhi11 Mediabuy Plugins Ad Review? This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.
Is Walkerhi11 Mediabuy Plugins Ad Review free to use? Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.
Who published Walkerhi11 Mediabuy Plugins Ad Review? tomevault-io (@tomevault-io) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.