tony /double-check:align
Recovery for a broken double-check. The chat currently holds a revision log — verdicts about prior claims, deltas against text the user never read. Replace it with the analysis itself.
Read ../../references/verification-contract.md
first — it is the contract this command restores.
$ARGUMENTS
- Empty — re-anchor on the subject of the most recent analysis thread, at its original scope.
- A topic or question — re-anchor on that instead. Narrowing is a feature: it discards the earlier answer's scaffolding, which is what lets omitted items finally surface.
Steps
- Recover the request. From the conversation, reconstruct the original question and every constraint the user has added since — including corrections they made that you agreed with. User turns are binding context; your own answer turns are not.
- Quarantine prior answers. Everything you previously concluded is untrusted until re-verified against source. Do not reuse prior numbering, category names, or verdict framing.
- Re-derive and restate. Re-open the source artifacts and write the full analysis, standalone, in the shape the original request implied. Every claim stated positively and in full — no verdict shorthand, no "as noted above", no delta table.
- Weakness inline. If a claim is weak, say why it is weak. Never say it was previously stated differently.
What this does not do
- Reference, summarize, or grade the earlier response — the user did not read it and will not.
- Edit files or commit — output is conversation only.
- Answer a different question than the one recovered or given — losing focus is the failure this command repairs.