Public Case Study (tier 3)
Turn a run package into a case study fit for external publication. Tier 3 is the hard sanitization tier: no internal identifiers of any kind, aggregates and ranges only, every headline claim triangulated. Value is engineer-hours, cycle time, and capacity; never money.
Read ../../references/interim-format.md first — it
defines run location and the completeness gate. Defer these rendering
references until the gate passes; a refused render never loads them:
../../references/provenance.md— tag rendering, anti-inflation rules, the no-currency contract.../../references/evidence.md— the external evidence table and the triangulation procedure.../../references/audiences.md— the tier-3 contract and the final checklist.
User arguments: $ARGUMENTS
Context
Recent runs:
!sh -c 'ls -dt "$HOME"/Documents/*/business/ /mnt/c/Users/*/Documents/*/business/ 2>/dev/null' | head -5 | grep . || echo "(no runs found)"
Procedure
1. Locate the run
Use the $ARGUMENTS path if given, else the newest run per
interim-format.md. Confirm the choice with the user.
2. Completeness gate
Run the completeness gate from interim-format.md. Refuse to render
from an incomplete package; list what is missing and stop.
3. Draft under the tier-3 contract
Read the deferred references above, then draft the case study in this order — sanitized from the first word, not sanitized afterwards:
- Context — the kind of team and the kind of task, described without identifying anyone or anything internal.
- Approach — what was built, in transferable terms.
- Results — aggregates and ranges only; every figure tagged as
tag plus method phrase per
audiences.md; denominators and pinned-window lengths stated; honest rounding. - Limitations — candid and mandatory: measurement weaknesses, the counterfactual rung, what was not measured. Credibility is the PR asset.
4. Triangulate every headline claim
Apply the triangulation procedure from evidence.md to each
headline claim. A claim outside the defensible external range is
removed or kept only with an explicit methodology defense. Record
each outcome.
5. Final checklist pass
Run the tier-3 final checklist from audiences.md over the finished
draft as an explicit pass, item by item. Fix every hit, then write
<run>/reports/case-study-public.md.
Output
Open with a one-line hero (✓ Public case study: <headline with tag>, ✓ Evidence report: <supported claim, unknowns named>, or
⚠ Refused: <reason>), then exactly these sections:
## Run— the run chosen and its pinned window.## Gate— the completeness result.## Sanitization— the checklist results item by item, and the triangulation outcome per headline claim.## Report— where it was written and the headline.
End with an AskUserQuestion panel: derive the PR release next,
tighten a claim, or stop. Skip the panel in plan mode or when
running non-interactively.