Review

Weave Code Review

Run code review through independent adversarial workers in parallel, then synthesize their findings into a unified report with evidence-backed adjudication. Host-native sub-agents are the default; separate model CLIs are optional. This is a project-read-only command — no files in your repository are written, edited, or deleted. Session artifacts (worker outputs, prompts, synthesis results) are persisted to $AI_AIP_ROOT for post-session inspection; this directory is outside your repository.

Worker selection

Before any other unresolved configuration choice or operational step, read ../../references/worker-backends.md. Resolve worker_backend from --workers=subagents|model-clis using that reference; if the flag is absent, ask its worker question first. If interactive choice is unavailable, honor its documented headless default.

The selected backend governs the whole session: dispatch, retry, judging, refinement, artifacts, session metadata, and presentation. The shared reference adapts provider-named examples across every later phase to that backend.

When worker_backend == subagents, use only the reference's native sub-agent path. Skip every model-CLI detection, timeout question, timeout resolution, retry, fallback, and dispatch instruction below. Every such instruction below is conditional on worker_backend == model-clis.

Orchestration Plan

Before dispatching the review to models, enter plan mode to create a review strategy.

Enter your tool's plan mode:

• Claude Code: Call EnterPlanMode
• Cursor: Use /plan or press Shift+Tab
• Codex: Use /plan to switch to Plan mode
• Gemini: Use /plan or press Shift+Tab
• Other tools: Use your tool's planning/read-only mode if available

If plan mode is not available, proceed — context gathering in Phase 1 still guides the review.

Create an orchestration plan covering:

1. Branch summary — What does this branch do? Summarize from commit messages and diff stats
2. Review focus areas — Which files/changes are highest risk or most complex? Where should reviewers concentrate?
3. Relevant conventions — Which CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md rules are most relevant to the changes in this branch?
4. Known concerns — Any areas the user flagged, or patterns in the diff that look risky (large functions, missing tests, API changes)
5. Model prompt strategy — What specific instructions should each model's review prompt emphasize, given the above?

Present the orchestration plan to the user. Wait for approval before proceeding to Phase 1. The user may adjust focus areas or add concerns.

After approval, exit plan mode:

• Claude Code: Call ExitPlanMode
• Cursor/Codex/Gemini: Exit plan mode per your tool's method

Then proceed to Phase 1, using the approved strategy to guide context gathering and prompt construction.

Phase 1: Gather Context

Goal: Understand the branch state and determine the trunk branch.

1. Determine trunk branch:

   git remote show origin | grep 'HEAD branch'
   

   Fall back to main, then master, if detection fails.

2. Get the diff stats:

   git diff origin/<trunk>...HEAD --stat
   

3. Get commit history for this branch:

   git log origin/<trunk>..HEAD --oneline
   

4. Read AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md if present at the repo root — these contain project conventions the review should enforce.

Phase 1b: Build Context Packet

Use the approved orchestration plan to prioritize which conventions, files, and concerns to include in the context packet. If no orchestration plan was created, proceed with default context gathering.

After Phase 1 context gathering, assemble a structured context bundle that will be included verbatim in ALL model prompts. This ensures every model works from the same information.

Write to $SESSION_DIR/context-packet.md (the actual file write happens after Session Directory Initialization in Phase 2 creates $SESSION_DIR):

1. Conventions summary — key rules from CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md (max 50 lines). Focus on commit format, test patterns, code style, and quality gates relevant to the task.

2. Repo state — branch, HEAD ref, trunk branch, uncommitted changes summary:

   git status --short
   

3. Changed files — for review/plan commands that operate on branch changes:

   git diff --stat origin/<trunk>...HEAD
   

4. Full diff — the complete diff output for external CLI models that cannot generate it themselves:

   git diff origin/<trunk>...HEAD
   

5. Relevant file list — files matching task keywords discovered during Phase 1 exploration. Include paths only, not content.

6. Key snippets — critical function signatures, types, test patterns, or API contracts relevant to the task (max 200 lines). Prioritize interfaces over implementations.

7. Known unknowns — aspects of the task that need discovery during execution. List what the model should investigate.

Size limit: 400 lines total. Prioritize by task relevance. If the packet exceeds 400 lines, truncate the least relevant sections (snippets first, then file list).

Usage in model prompts:

• For the Claude Task agent: reference the file path ($SESSION_DIR/context-packet.md) — the agent reads it directly
• For Antigravity and GPT sub-agents: include the context packet content in the agent prompt, which the sub-agent then passes to the external CLI

For review, prioritize conventions summary (review should enforce these), changed files (full diff stats), and key snippets of modified code. Known unknowns should note any areas of the diff that are hard to review without more context.

Phase 2: Configuration and Model Detection

Step 1: Parse Flags

Scan $ARGUMENTS for explicit flags anywhere in the text. Flags use --name=value syntax and are stripped from the prompt text before sending to models.

Mode presets set default passes and timeout when not explicitly overridden:

Backward compatibility: Legacy trigger words are silently recognized as aliases:

• multipass (case-insensitive) → --passes=2
• x<N> (N = 2–5, regex \bx([2-5])\b) → --passes=N
• timeout:<seconds> → --timeout=<seconds>
• timeout:none → --timeout=none

Legacy triggers are scanned on the first and last line only (to avoid false positives in pasted content). Explicit -- flags take priority over legacy triggers.

Values above 5 for --passes are capped at 5 with a note to the user.

Config flags (used in Step 2):

• pass_count = parsed pass count from --passes, mode preset, or legacy trigger. Null if not provided.
• timeout_value = parsed timeout from --timeout, mode preset, or legacy trigger. Null if not provided.

Step 2: Interactive Configuration

When flags are provided, skip the corresponding question. When --passes is provided, skip the passes question. When --timeout is provided, skip the timeout question.

If AskUserQuestion is unavailable (headless mode via claude -p), use pass_count value if set, otherwise default to 1 pass. Timeout uses timeout_value if set, otherwise the command's default timeout.

Use AskUserQuestion to prompt the user for any unresolved settings:

Question 1 — Passes (skipped when --passes was provided):

• question: "How many synthesis passes? Multi-pass re-attacks unresolved residuals from the prior pass."
• header: "Passes"
• When pass_count exists (from mode preset or legacy trigger), move the matching option first with "(Recommended)" suffix. Other options follow in ascending order.
• When pass_count is null, use default ordering:
  • "1 — single pass (Recommended)" — Run models once and synthesize. Sufficient for most tasks.
  • "2 — multipass" — One refinement round. Models re-attack only the prior pass's unresolved residuals.
  • "3 — triple pass" — Two refinement rounds. Maximum depth, highest token usage.

Question 2 — Timeout (skipped when --timeout was provided):

• question: "Timeout for external model commands?"
• header: "Timeout"
• options:
  • "Default (900s)" — Use this command's built-in default timeout.
  • "Quick — 450s" — For fast queries (0.5× default). May timeout on complex tasks.
  • "Long — 1350s" — For complex tasks (1.5× default). Higher wait on failures.
  • "None" — No timeout. Wait indefinitely for each model.

Step 3: Detect Available Models

Goal: Check which AI CLI tools are installed locally.

Run these checks in parallel:

command -v agy >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "agy:available" || echo "agy:missing"

command -v gemini >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "gemini:available" || echo "gemini:missing"

command -v codex >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "codex:available" || echo "codex:missing"

command -v agent >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "agent:available" || echo "agent:missing"

Model resolution (priority order)

Resolution logic for each external slot:

1. Native CLI found → use it
2. Else next CLI in the fallback chain → use it (agent slots use the --model flag)
3. Else → slot unavailable, note in report

The Antigravity slot is Google's lane: agy (Antigravity) supersedes the standalone gemini CLI, which Google retires on 2026-06-18. agy has no native read-only mode, so read-only commands isolate it in a disposable git worktree (Repo Guard Layer 1; see docs/repo-guard-protocol.md).

Report which models will participate and which backend each uses.

Step 4: Detect Timeout Command

command -v timeout >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "timeout:available" || { command -v gtimeout >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "gtimeout:available" || echo "timeout:none"; }

On Linux, timeout is available by default. On macOS, gtimeout is available via GNU coreutils. If neither is found, run external commands without a timeout prefix — time limits will not be enforced. Do not install packages automatically.

Store the resolved timeout command (timeout, gtimeout, or empty) for use in all subsequent CLI invocations. When constructing bash commands, replace <timeout_cmd> with the resolved command and <timeout_seconds> with the resolved value (from trigger parsing, interactive config, or the command's default). If no timeout command is available, omit the prefix entirely. When --timeout=none is configured (via flag or interactive selection), also omit <timeout_cmd> and <timeout_seconds> entirely — run external commands without any timeout prefix.

Session Directory Initialization

Step 1: Resolve storage root

if [ -n "$AI_AIP_ROOT" ]; then
  AIP_ROOT="$AI_AIP_ROOT"
elif [ -n "$XDG_STATE_HOME" ]; then
  AIP_ROOT="$XDG_STATE_HOME/ai-aip"
elif [ "$(uname -s)" = "Darwin" ]; then
  AIP_ROOT="$HOME/Library/Application Support/ai-aip"
else
  AIP_ROOT="$HOME/.local/state/ai-aip"
fi

Create a /tmp/ai-aip symlink to the resolved root for backward compatibility (if /tmp/ai-aip doesn't already exist or isn't already correct):

ln -sfn "$AIP_ROOT" /tmp/ai-aip 2>/dev/null || true

Step 2: Compute repo identity

REPO_TOPLEVEL="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"

REPO_SLUG="$(basename "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | sed 's/[^a-z0-9._-]/-/g')"

REPO_ORIGIN="$(git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null || true)"

if [ -n "$REPO_ORIGIN" ]; then
  REPO_KEY="${REPO_ORIGIN}|${REPO_SLUG}"
else
  REPO_KEY="$REPO_TOPLEVEL"
fi

if command -v sha256sum >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  REPO_ID="$(printf '%s' "$REPO_KEY" | sha256sum | cut -c1-12)"
else
  REPO_ID="$(printf '%s' "$REPO_KEY" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-12)"
fi

REPO_DIR="${REPO_SLUG}--${REPO_ID}"

Step 3: Generate session ID

SESSION_ID="$(date -u '+%Y%m%d-%H%M%SZ')-$$-$(head -c2 /dev/urandom | od -An -tx1 | tr -d ' ')"

Step 4: Create session directory

SESSION_DIR="$AIP_ROOT/repos/$REPO_DIR/sessions/review/$SESSION_ID"

Create the session directory tree:

mkdir -p -m 700 "$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/outputs" "$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/stderr"

Step 5: Write repo.json (if missing)

If $AIP_ROOT/repos/$REPO_DIR/repo.json does not exist, write it with these contents:

{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "slug": "<REPO_SLUG>",
  "id": "<REPO_ID>",
  "toplevel": "<REPO_TOPLEVEL>",
  "origin": "<REPO_ORIGIN or null>"
}

Step 6: Write session.json (atomic replace)

Write to $SESSION_DIR/session.json.tmp, then mv session.json.tmp session.json:

{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "session_id": "<SESSION_ID>",
  "command": "review",
  "status": "in_progress",
  "branch": "<current branch>",
  "ref": "<short SHA>",
  "worker_backend": "<subagents or model-clis>",
  "participants": ["<participant artifact ID>", "..."],
  "executors": {"<participant artifact ID>": "<executor>"},
  "completed_passes": 0,
  "prompt_summary": "<first 120 chars of user prompt>",
  "created_at": "<ISO 8601 UTC>",
  "updated_at": "<ISO 8601 UTC>"
}

When worker_backend == model-clis, add a "models" array containing the resolved model for each participant. Omit "models" when worker_backend == subagents.

Step 7: Append events.jsonl

Append one event line to $SESSION_DIR/events.jsonl:

{"event":"session_start","timestamp":"<ISO 8601 UTC>","command":"review","worker_backend":"<subagents or model-clis>","participants":["<participant artifact ID>","..."]}

Step 8: Write metadata.md

Write to $SESSION_DIR/metadata.md containing:

• Command name, start time, configured pass count
• Worker backend, participant artifact IDs, and executor mapping
• Resolved models only for model-clis, timeout setting when applicable
• Git branch (git branch --show-current), commit ref (git rev-parse --short HEAD)

Store $SESSION_DIR for use in all subsequent phases.

Step 8b: Repo Guard — Capture Fingerprint

Capture the repository state before any model runs. See docs/repo-guard-protocol.md Layer 2 for the full protocol.

REPO_TOPLEVEL="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"

REPO_HEAD="$(git -C "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" rev-parse HEAD)"

REPO_FINGERPRINT="$(git -C "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" status --porcelain)"

Write $SESSION_DIR/repo-fingerprint.txt containing the HEAD ref and status output. Store $REPO_TOPLEVEL for use in all subsequent phases.

Step 9: Write Context Packet

Write the Context Packet built in Phase 1b to $SESSION_DIR/context-packet.md.

Phase 2b: Cascade Gate (only when --cascade was set)

Read ../../references/ensemble-techniques.md (Technique 1) and apply it: run the Claude Review lane from Phase 3 alone, self-verify per Phase 4's Verify Claims step, and evaluate the five escalation triggers — for review, any Critical finding fires the judgment-call trigger, so Criticals always get ensemble confirmation. On early-exit, skip the external lanes, blind judging, and rubric scoring; run the Critic and deslop steps, then present with CASCADE_STATE = early-exit. On escalate (or user escalation from the panel), continue to Phase 3 with the cheap-pass output reused as the Claude lane. Without --cascade, skip this phase.

Phase 3: Launch Reviews in Parallel

Goal: Run all available reviewers simultaneously.

Prompt Preparation

Each model receives a distinct evaluation lens to decorrelate outputs and reduce shared blind spots. The same context packet is included for all models, but a different role preamble is prepended to each prompt.

Role preambles are prepended before the task-specific prompt and context packet. The role does not change the task — it changes the lens through which the model approaches it.

Include the context packet from Phase 1b. Write the prompt content to $SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/prompt.md using the Write tool.

Claude Review (Task agent)

Launch a Task agent with subagent_type: "general-purpose" to perform Claude's own code review:

Prompt for the Claude review agent:

CRITICAL: Do NOT write, edit, create, or delete any files in the repository. Do NOT use Write, Edit, or Bash commands that modify repository files. All session artifacts are written to $SESSION_DIR, which is outside the repository. This is a READ-ONLY research task.

Perform a thorough code review of the changes on this branch compared to origin/.

Run git diff origin/<trunk>...HEAD to see all changes. Read the CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md file at the repo root for project conventions.

Review for:

1. Bugs and logic errors — incorrect behavior, edge cases, off-by-one errors
2. Security issues — injection, XSS, unsafe deserialization, secrets in code
3. Project convention violations — check against CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md
4. Code quality — duplication, unclear naming, missing error handling
5. Test coverage gaps — new code paths without tests

For each issue found, report:

• Severity: Critical / Important / Suggestion
• File and line: exact location
• Description: what the issue is
• Recommendation: how to fix it

Assign a confidence score (0-100) to each issue. Only report issues with confidence >= 70.

Antigravity Review (sub-agent)

Launch a Task agent (subagent_type: "general-purpose", mode: "default") to execute the Antigravity (agy) model. Include in the agent prompt: the resolved backend command and timeout from Phase 2, the $SESSION_DIR path, the $REPO_TOPLEVEL path and $REPO_FINGERPRINT value for repo guard verification, the pass number, and the review focus with additional instructions:

<review context from $ARGUMENTS, or default: Review the changes on this branch for bugs, security issues, and convention violations.>

---

Additional instructions: Run git diff origin/...HEAD to see the changes. Read AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md for project conventions. For each issue, report: severity (Critical/Important/Suggestion), file and line, description, and recommendation. Focus on bugs, logic errors, security issues, and convention violations. CRITICAL: Do NOT write, edit, create, or delete any files. Do NOT use any file-writing or file-modification tools. This is a READ-ONLY research task. All output must go to stdout. Any file modifications will be automatically detected and reverted.

The agent must:

1. Read the prompt from $SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/prompt.md

2. Run the resolved Antigravity command with output redirection. Repo Guard: agy has no native read-only mode (its print mode reads and writes), so isolate it in a disposable git worktree checked out at HEAD — agy reads the snapshot while any stray write lands in the throwaway worktree, never the main repo (see docs/repo-guard-protocol.md Layer 1). The gemini and agent fallbacks keep their own native read-only modes.

   Primary (agy CLI, disposable worktree):

   (AGY_RO_WT="${REPO_TOPLEVEL}-weave-agy-ro"; git -C "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" worktree remove --force "$AGY_RO_WT" 2>/dev/null; git -C "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" worktree add -q --detach "$AGY_RO_WT" HEAD && (cd "$AGY_RO_WT" && <timeout_cmd> <timeout_seconds> agy --model "Gemini 3.1 Pro (High)" --add-dir "$AGY_RO_WT" --dangerously-skip-permissions -p "$(cat "$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/prompt.md")" </dev/null >"$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/outputs/agy.md" 2>"$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/stderr/agy.txt"); rc=$?; git -C "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" worktree remove --force "$AGY_RO_WT" 2>/dev/null; exit "$rc")
   

   Fallback (gemini CLI):

   (cd "$SESSION_DIR" && <timeout_cmd> <timeout_seconds> gemini -m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode plan --include-directories "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" --skip-trust -p "$(cat "$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/prompt.md")" >"$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/outputs/agy.md" 2>"$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/stderr/agy.txt")
   

   Fallback (agent CLI):

   (cd "$SESSION_DIR" && <timeout_cmd> <timeout_seconds> agent -p --mode plan --trust --workspace "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" --model gemini-3.1-pro "$(cat "$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/prompt.md")" >"$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/outputs/agy.md" 2>>"$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/stderr/agy.txt")
   

3. Repo Guard: After the CLI returns, verify the repository is unchanged (see docs/repo-guard-protocol.md Layer 3):

   CURRENT_STATUS="$(git -C "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" status --porcelain)"
   

   if [ "$CURRENT_STATUS" != "$REPO_FINGERPRINT" ]; then
     echo "REPO GUARD VIOLATION: agy modified repository files" >&2
     git -C "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" checkout -- . 2>/dev/null
     git -C "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" clean -fd 2>/dev/null
     printf '{"event":"repo_guard_violation","timestamp":"%s","model":"agy","reverted":true}\n' "$(date -u '+%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ')" >>"$SESSION_DIR/guard-events.jsonl"
   fi
   

4. On failure: classify (timeout → retry with 1.5× timeout; rate-limit → retry after 10s; credit-exhausted → skip retry, escalate to the next backend immediately; crash → not retryable; empty → retry once), retry max once with same backend, then fall back down the chain (agy → gemini → agent) if a native CLI was used; if all are credit-exhausted or unavailable, use the lesser model (Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) via agy for Antigravity; gpt-5.4-mini via agent for GPT)

5. Return: exit code, elapsed time, retry count, output file path

GPT Review (sub-agent)

Launch a Task agent (subagent_type: "general-purpose", mode: "default") to execute the GPT model. Include in the agent prompt: the resolved backend command and timeout from Phase 2, the $SESSION_DIR path, the $REPO_TOPLEVEL path and $REPO_FINGERPRINT value for repo guard verification, the pass number, and the review focus with additional instructions:

<review context from $ARGUMENTS, or default: Review the changes on this branch for bugs, security issues, and convention violations.>

---

Additional instructions: Run git diff origin/...HEAD to see the changes. Read AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md for project conventions. For each issue, report: severity (Critical/Important/Suggestion), file and line, description, and recommendation. Focus on bugs, logic errors, security issues, and convention violations. CRITICAL: Do NOT write, edit, create, or delete any files. Do NOT use any file-writing or file-modification tools. This is a READ-ONLY research task. All output must go to stdout. Any file modifications will be automatically detected and reverted.

The agent must:

1. Read the prompt from $SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/prompt.md

2. Run the resolved GPT command with output redirection. Repo Guard: invoke the CLI in its native read-only sandbox — it reads the repo but cannot write it (see docs/repo-guard-protocol.md Layer 1):

   Native (codex CLI):

   (cd "$SESSION_DIR" && <timeout_cmd> <timeout_seconds> codex exec -s read-only -C "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" --skip-git-repo-check </dev/null \
       -c model_reasoning_effort=medium \
       "$(cat "$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/prompt.md")" >"$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/outputs/gpt.md" 2>"$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/stderr/gpt.txt")
   

   Fallback (agent CLI):

   (cd "$SESSION_DIR" && <timeout_cmd> <timeout_seconds> agent -p --mode plan --trust --workspace "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" --model gpt-5.4-high "$(cat "$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/prompt.md")" >"$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/outputs/gpt.md" 2>>"$SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/stderr/gpt.txt")
   

3. Repo Guard: After the CLI returns, verify the repository is unchanged (see docs/repo-guard-protocol.md Layer 3):

   CURRENT_STATUS="$(git -C "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" status --porcelain)"
   

   if [ "$CURRENT_STATUS" != "$REPO_FINGERPRINT" ]; then
     echo "REPO GUARD VIOLATION: gpt modified repository files" >&2
     git -C "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" checkout -- . 2>/dev/null
     git -C "$REPO_TOPLEVEL" clean -fd 2>/dev/null
     printf '{"event":"repo_guard_violation","timestamp":"%s","model":"gpt","reverted":true}\n' "$(date -u '+%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ')" >>"$SESSION_DIR/guard-events.jsonl"
   fi
   

4. On failure: classify (timeout → retry with 1.5× timeout; rate-limit → retry after 10s; credit-exhausted → skip retry, escalate to agent CLI immediately; crash → not retryable; empty → retry once), retry max once with same backend, then fall back to agent CLI if native was used; if agent is also credit-exhausted or unavailable, use lesser model (Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) via agy for Antigravity; gpt-5.4-mini via agent for GPT)

5. Return: exit code, elapsed time, retry count, output file path

Artifact Capture

After each model completes, persist its output to the session directory:

• Claude: Write the Task agent's response to $SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/outputs/claude.md
• Antigravity: Written by the Antigravity sub-agent to $SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/outputs/agy.md
• GPT: Written by the GPT sub-agent to $SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/outputs/gpt.md

Execution Strategy

• Launch all model agents in the same turn to execute simultaneously. If parallel dispatch is unavailable, launch sequentially — the synthesis phase handles partial results.
• Each sub-agent handles its own retry and fallback protocol internally (see steps 3-4 in each agent's instructions above).
• After all agents return, verify output files exist in $SESSION_DIR/pass-NNNN/outputs/.
• If a sub-agent reports failure after exhausting retries, mark that model as unavailable for this pass and include failure details in the report.
• Never block the entire workflow on a single model failure.

Phase 4: Synthesize Findings

Goal: Combine all reviewer outputs into a unified, evidence-verified report.

Blind Judging Protocol

Before synthesis, strip model identity from responses to prevent brand bias during evaluation.

Step 1: Randomize Labels

Assign random labels (Response A, Response B, Response C) to the model outputs. Use a random permutation — do not always assign Claude to A. Record the mapping in $SESSION_DIR/pass-NNNN/label-map.json:

{
  "A": "<model>",
  "B": "<model>",
  "C": "<model>"
}

Step 2: Evaluate Blindly

During scoring and adjudication (see Synthesis Protocol), refer to responses only by their labels (A/B/C). Do not consider which model produced which output.

Step 3: Reveal After Scoring

After all scoring and adjudication is complete, reveal the model identities in the attribution section of the final report. Include the label mapping so the user can trace which model produced which response.

Limitation: Claude is both participant and judge. True blindness is impossible for Claude's own output — it may recognize its own writing style. The blind labeling primarily prevents bias when evaluating external model outputs against each other.

Synthesis Protocol

After collecting model outputs and applying blind labels, follow this evidence-backed synthesis protocol.

Step 1: Verify Claims

For each blinded response (A/B/C), check factual claims against the codebase:

• File references: Use Glob and Read to confirm referenced files exist
• Function/API references: Read the file and verify function signatures, class names, and API contracts match what the response claims
• Convention claims: Check against CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md — does the response correctly apply project rules?
• Classify each claim: verified (confirmed by reading code), plausible-unverified (reasonable but not checked), or false (contradicted by code)

Write the verification results to $SESSION_DIR/pass-NNNN/verification.md.

Step 2: Score with Rubric

Rate each blinded response 0–10 per dimension using the Review Rubric:

Review Rubric

Compute a weighted total for each response.

Write scores to $SESSION_DIR/pass-NNNN/scores.md in a table showing per-dimension scores and weighted totals for each label (A/B/C).

Step 3: Adjudicate Conflicts

Compare responses to identify:

• Agreement points — all responses concur on these → accept as foundation
• Conflicts — responses disagree → verify against the codebase, accept the one supported by evidence
• Unresolvable conflicts — cannot determine which is correct from code alone → note both positions with available evidence

Step 4: Converge (Merge)

Build the final result using merge convergence: combine agreed points as foundation, apply adjudicated conflict resolutions, incorporate best unique contributions ordered by score, strip unverified claims.

Step 5: Critic

Launch an independent Task agent (subagent_type: "general-purpose") to challenge the synthesized result:

Review the following synthesis for errors. Your job is to BREAK it — find problems, not confirm it's good.

Find: (1) remaining factual errors — file/function references that don't exist, (2) logical inconsistencies — steps that contradict each other, (3) missing edge cases — failure modes not addressed, (4) convention violations — rules from CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md not followed.

Emit ONLY deltas: each issue found and its specific fix. Do not rewrite the entire synthesis.

Write the critic's findings to $SESSION_DIR/pass-NNNN/critic.md. Incorporate valid findings into the final output — verify each critic finding against the codebase before accepting it.

Verification for Review Findings

In Step 1 (Verify Claims) of the synthesis protocol, apply review-specific verification:

• For each reported bug or issue, read the file and line to confirm the issue exists
• For severity claims, verify the actual impact — is a "Critical" truly exploitable or crash-worthy?
• For convention violations, check the specific rule in CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md

Cross-Reference and Deduplicate

After verification, group findings that refer to the same issue (same file, similar description). For each unique issue:

• Consensus count: how many reviewers flagged it (1, 2, or 3)
• Consensus boost: Issues flagged by multiple reviewers get higher confidence
  • 1 reviewer: use reported severity as-is
  • 2 reviewers: promote severity by one level (Suggestion → Important, Important → Critical)
  • 3 reviewers: mark as Critical regardless

Record the per-finding consensus map to $SESSION_DIR/pass-NNNN/consensus.md: classify each lane per finding as agree, dissent (incompatible position, including "not an issue"), or silent; over M lanes the levels are unanimous (M/M), majority (> M/2, someone dissents or is silent), split (no position

M/2), and single (one agree, rest silent). Dissent and silence are not the same — a single uncontested finding outranks a split one. On cascade-escalated runs, findings restating a fired trigger count external lanes only. In the report, every finding carries its consensus tag (consensus 2/3, consensus 1/3 (uncontested)), findings within a severity band are ordered unanimous-verified, majority-verified, single-verified, then unverified, and split findings that verification could not settle MUST appear under Reviewer Disagreements with both positions — never dropped.

Deslop Pass (final pass only)

This step runs only when the current pass is the final pass — for pass_count == 1, that is this pass; for pass_count >= 2, it runs at the end of Phase 5's last iteration. Skip if --no-deslop was set.

1. Write the synthesised report to $SESSION_DIR/pass-NNNN/synthesis.md now, before rendering the Present template.
2. Read ../../references/deslop-pass.md and apply it with ARTIFACT_PATH=$SESSION_DIR/pass-NNNN/synthesis.md, SESSION_DIR, the captured BASELINE_SHA, and DESLOP_MODE from the flag.
3. Re-read synthesis.md. Render the Present template using the desloped report. The deslop summary block appears after the Attribution section.

Present the report

Read ../../references/present-results.md and apply it with:

• RESULT_KIND = review
• ARTIFACT_PATH = $SESSION_DIR/pass-NNNN/synthesis.md
• SESSION_DIR = $SESSION_DIR
• PASS_COUNT = the resolved pass count
• IN_PLAN_MODE = false
• WORKER_BACKEND = worker_backend
• PARTICIPANTS = the successful participant artifact IDs
• EXECUTORS = the resolved participant artifact ID to executor mapping
• MODELS = resolved models when worker_backend == model-clis; otherwise null
• LABEL_MAP_PATH = $SESSION_DIR/pass-NNNN/label-map.json
• CASCADE_STATE = early-exit, escalated, or null when --cascade was not set

After the reference returns, finalize the session per the existing session finalization block.

After presenting the report, persist the synthesis:

• The synthesised report was already written to $SESSION_DIR/pass-0001/synthesis.md by the Deslop Pass step. When --no-deslop was set, write it now as a fallback.
• Update session.json via atomic replace: set completed_passes to 1, updated_at to now. Append a pass_complete event to events.jsonl.

Phase 5: Multi-Pass Refinement

If pass_count is 1, skip this phase.

For pass N ≥ 2, do NOT re-run the entire task. Passes are residual re-attacks per ../../references/ensemble-techniques.md (Technique 2): extract $SESSION_DIR/pass-<N-1>/residuals.md from the prior pass's unresolved conflicts, failed verification, unincorporated critic findings, and split-consensus items. An empty ledger means convergence — stop early and report it.

After collecting targeted responses:

• Merge resolutions back into the prior synthesis at the quoted regions; untouched findings carry forward verbatim
• Re-score only affected dimensions (not the full rubric); re-adjudicate only the ledger items
• Early-stop: If no material delta between this pass and the prior pass (no scores changed by more than 1, no new conflicts identified), stop refinement early and report convergence

Follow the same retry protocol and artifact capture as the initial pass.

For each pass from 2 to pass_count:

1. Create the pass directory:

   mkdir -p -m 700 "$SESSION_DIR/pass-$(printf '%04d' $N)/outputs" "$SESSION_DIR/pass-$(printf '%04d' $N)/stderr"
   

2. Construct the residual re-attack prompt from the ledger — entries only, each with at most 10 lines of surrounding synthesis excerpt, never the full prior synthesis. For Claude, reference prior artifacts by path; for external models, inline them.

3. Write the refinement prompt to $SESSION_DIR/pass-{N}/prompt.md and re-run all available reviewers in parallel (same backends, same timeouts, same retry logic as Phase 3).

4. Capture outputs to $SESSION_DIR/pass-{N}/outputs/<model>.md.

5. Re-synthesize by merge-back (Technique 2). Write to $SESSION_DIR/pass-{N}/synthesis.md.

6. Final-pass deslop: when this is the final pass (last iteration of the loop, or convergence), run Phase 4's Deslop Pass step on $SESSION_DIR/pass-{N}/synthesis.md before presenting. Gated on --no-deslop exactly as in Phase 4.

7. Early-stop if no material delta from prior pass. Update session: set completed_passes to N in session.json, append pass_complete to events.jsonl.

Present the final-pass synthesis, adding a Confidence Evolution table:

## Confidence Evolution

| Finding | Pass 1 | Pass 2 | Pass 3 | Status |
|---------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| file:42 null check | 2/3 reviewers | 3/3 reviewers | — | Confirmed |
| file:15 type error | 1/3 reviewers | 0/3 reviewers | — | Retracted |
| file:99 race condition | — | 2/3 reviewers | 3/3 reviewers | New (confirmed) |

Phase 6: Recommendations

After presenting the report:

1. Prioritize consensus issues — these have the highest confidence since multiple independent models agree
2. Flag reviewer disagreements — where one model says it's fine and another says it's a bug, note both perspectives for the user to decide
3. Suggest next steps:
   • Fix critical consensus issues first
   • Address single-reviewer critical issues
   • Consider important issues
   • Optionally address suggestions

Rules

• Never modify project code — this is project-read-only review. Session artifacts are written to $AI_AIP_ROOT, which is outside the repository. The Repo Guard Protocol (docs/repo-guard-protocol.md) enforces this: external CLIs run in their native read-only sandbox (Layer 1) — they can read the repo but not write it — post-CLI verification reverts any write that bypasses the sandbox, and session-end verification catches anything else.
• Always attempt to run all available reviewers, even if one fails
• Always clearly attribute which reviewer(s) found each issue
• Consensus issues take priority over single-reviewer issues
• If no external reviewers are available, fall back to Claude-only review and note the limitation
• Use <timeout_cmd> <timeout_seconds> for external CLI commands, resolved from Phase 2 Step 4. If no timeout command is available, omit the prefix entirely. Adjust higher or lower based on observed completion times.
• Capture stderr from external tools (via $SESSION_DIR/pass-{N}/stderr/<model>.txt) to report failures clearly
• If an exter

…(truncated)