2844 Report Design 874a71e1

v3.0.3 Report Enhancement Design Document

Version: 3.0.3 Date: 2026-02-09 Status: Approved

1. Problem Diagnosis

1.1 Structural Problems

• Main report has only 9 sections, missing a high-level risk posture overview (dashboard view)
• No per-risk detailed analysis reports — all risks condensed into summary tables
• No HTML output — only Markdown, which is hard to read on screen

1.2 Content Quality Problems

• §1 Executive Summary: Only Top-3 critical risks, only 5 key findings → insufficient
• §2 System Architecture Overview: Missing dependency graph, tech stack security context, entry point quantification, criticality notation
• §3 Security Design Assessment: Missing security scorecard, domain evaluation detail, threat-gap traceability matrix, gap categorization
• §5 Risk Validation: POC content sometimes summarized despite prohibition
• §6 Attack Path Analysis: ASCII diagrams only, no Mermaid for complex flows
• §8 Mitigation: Missing implementation difficulty and effort breakdown

1.3 Readability Problems

• Monotonous text formatting, no visual hierarchy
• No diagram support beyond ASCII art
• Large tables without color-coding for severity
• No navigation or cross-reference structure

2. Three-Layer Enhancement Plan

Layer 1: Main Report Optimization (10-Section Template)

Expand from 9 sections to 10 sections. Optimize ALL existing sections.

§0 Risk Posture Overview (NEW)

• Top-10 Risk Cards: Each card shows VR-ID, title, CVSS, STRIDE type, priority, affected modules
• STRIDE × Severity Heatmap Matrix: 6×4 grid (S/T/R/I/D/E × CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
• Key Metrics Dashboard:
  • Total risks by priority (P0/P1/P2/P3)
  • Average CVSS score
  • Attack surface breadth (entry points × boundaries)
  • Mitigation coverage ratio

§1 Executive Summary (ENHANCED)

• 10 Key Findings (was 5)
• Immediate Action Items: Top-3 P0 with responsible team and deadline
• Assessment Scope Summary: project path, tech stack, module count, analysis duration

§2 System Architecture Overview (ENHANCED)

• Dependency Graph: Module dependency visualization (ASCII in .md, Mermaid in HTML)
• Tech Stack Security Context: Framework versions with known CVE status
• Entry Point Quantification: Count by type (API/UI/CLI/WebSocket/gRPC), with auth status
• Trust Boundary Mechanisms: Summary of controls at each boundary crossing
• Criticality Notation: Mark security-critical modules with ⚠️ in component table
• Security Observations from P1-P3: Inline findings with F-xxx references

§3 Security Design Assessment (ENHANCED)

• Security Scorecard: Standardized X/100 score per domain (16 domains)
• Domain Evaluation Detail: For each domain: checks performed, checks passed, gaps found, coverage %
• Threat-Gap Traceability Matrix: GAP-xxx → T-xxx → VR-xxx cross-reference table
• Gap Categorization: G-ARCH (architecture redesign), G-IMPL (code/config fix), G-PROC (policy/process)
• Control Flow Diagram: Security control assessment workflow (ASCII)
• Priority Matrix: Gap severity × effort matrix for remediation planning

§4 STRIDE Threat Analysis (MAINTAINED)

• Keep current structure, no changes needed

§5 Risk Validation & POC Design (ENHANCED)

• Complete POC Content: Enforce verbatim copy with code blocks
• Verification Status Badges: ✅ Verified | ⚠️ Theoretical | ❓ Pending | ❌ Excluded
• POC Execution Environment: Required tools, environment setup instructions

§6 Attack Path Analysis (ENHANCED)

• DFD Report: ASCII + Mermaid diagrams side-by-side in .md
• Other .md reports: ASCII diagrams only
• HTML reports: Rendered Mermaid via CDN

§7 Threat Priority Matrix (MAINTAINED)

• Keep current structure, no changes needed

§8 Mitigation Recommendations (ENHANCED)

• Implementation Difficulty Rating: LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH per mitigation
• Effort Breakdown: Estimated hours/days per mitigation
• Before/After Code Comparison: Side-by-side diff format
• Dependency Chain: MIT-xxx prerequisite relationships

§9 Compliance Mapping (MAINTAINED)

• Keep current structure, no changes needed

Layer 2: P8R Detailed Risk Reports (NEW)

Optional post-P8 phase generating per-VR detailed analysis reports.

Trigger Conditions

1. P8 completion prompt: "Generate detailed risk analysis? [Y/N]"
2. --detailed flag at session start
3. Standalone invocation: phase_data.py --p8r --session {SESSION_ID}

Output Structure

Risk_Assessment_Report/
└── detailed/
    ├── VR-001-{title-slug}.md
    ├── VR-002-{title-slug}.md
    └── ...

12 Analysis Elements Per VR Report

Reference Standard

• VR-Analysis samples at ~/STRIDE/test/e/EDA代码文件/Risk_Assessment_Report/VR-Analysis/*.md
• 20 VR reports (VR-001 through VR-020), each 4K-30K characters

Layer 3: HTML Output Support (NEW)

HTML Report Generator (scripts/report_generator.py)

Batch MD→HTML converter with:

• Terminal aesthetic CSS (reuse from md_to_html.py)
• CJK font stack (Sarasa Term SC, Noto Sans Mono CJK SC, PingFang SC)
• Mermaid CDN rendering (client-side via <script src="mermaid.min.js">)
• Severity color coding (CRITICAL=red, HIGH=orange, MEDIUM=yellow, LOW=blue)
• Navigation sidebar with report index
• Index page (index.html) with links to all reports
• Print-friendly media queries

Output Structure:

Risk_Assessment_Report/
└── html/
    ├── index.html                    ← Report index page
    ├── RISK-ASSESSMENT-REPORT.html   ← Main report
    ├── RISK-INVENTORY.html
    ├── MITIGATION-MEASURES.html
    ├── PENETRATION-TEST-PLAN.html
    ├── ARCHITECTURE-ANALYSIS.html
    ├── DFD-DIAGRAM.html
    ├── COMPLIANCE-REPORT.html
    ├── ATTACK-PATH-VALIDATION.html
    └── detailed/                     ← If P8R was executed
        ├── VR-001-{slug}.html
        └── ...

Mermaid Rendering Strategy:

• In .md files: ASCII diagrams (always readable)
• In DFD .md: ASCII + Mermaid source side-by-side
• In HTML: Mermaid source rendered via client-side JS
• Mermaid CDN: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mermaid/dist/mermaid.min.js

3. Implementation File List

4. Design Decisions

5. Backward Compatibility

• Existing P1-P8 workflow unchanged
• P8R is optional (only triggered by --detailed flag or user confirmation)
• HTML output is additive (generated alongside existing .md reports)
• No changes to PostToolUse hook behavior
• No changes to phase_data.py validation logic

End of Report Enhancement Design Document