ISO 14971:2019 Implementation Guide
Complete implementation framework for medical device risk management per ISO 14971:2019.
Table of Contents
Risk Management Planning
Risk Management Plan Content
| Element |
Requirement |
Documentation |
| Scope |
Medical device and lifecycle stages covered |
Scope statement |
| Responsibilities |
Personnel and authority assignments |
Organization chart, RACI |
| Review Requirements |
Timing and triggers for reviews |
Review schedule |
| Acceptability Criteria |
Risk acceptance matrix and policy |
Risk acceptability criteria |
| Verification Activities |
Methods for control verification |
Verification plan |
| Production/Post-Production |
Activities for ongoing risk management |
Surveillance plan |
Risk Management Plan Template
RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Document Number: RMP-[Product]-[Rev]
Product: [Device Name]
Revision: [X.X]
Effective Date: [Date]
1. SCOPE AND PURPOSE
1.1 Medical Device Description: [Description]
1.2 Intended Use: [Statement]
1.3 Lifecycle Stages Covered: [Design/Production/Post-Market]
1.4 Plan Objectives: [Objectives]
2. RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES
| Role | Responsibility | Authority |
|------|----------------|-----------|
| Risk Management Lead | Overall RM process | RM decisions |
| Design Engineer | Risk identification | Design changes |
| QA Manager | RM file review | File approval |
| Clinical | Clinical input | Clinical risk assessment |
3. RISK ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA
3.1 Risk Matrix: [Reference to matrix]
3.2 Acceptability Policy: [Acceptable/ALARP/Unacceptable definitions]
3.3 Benefit-Risk Considerations: [When applicable]
4. VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES
4.1 Risk Control Verification Methods: [Test, Analysis, Review]
4.2 Verification Timing: [Design phase, V&V]
4.3 Acceptance Criteria: [Pass/fail criteria]
5. PRODUCTION AND POST-PRODUCTION
5.1 Information Collection: [Sources]
5.2 Review Triggers: [Events requiring review]
5.3 Update Process: [RM file update procedure]
6. REVIEW AND APPROVAL
Prepared By: _________________ Date: _______
Reviewed By: _________________ Date: _______
Approved By: _________________ Date: _______
Risk Acceptability Criteria Definition
| Risk Level |
Definition |
Action Required |
| Broadly Acceptable |
Risk so low that no action needed |
Document and monitor |
| ALARP (Tolerable) |
Risk reduced as low as reasonably practicable |
Verify ALARP, consider benefit |
| Unacceptable |
Risk exceeds acceptable threshold |
Risk control mandatory |
Risk Matrix Example (5x5)
| Probability \ Severity |
Negligible |
Minor |
Serious |
Critical |
Catastrophic |
| Frequent |
Medium |
High |
High |
Unacceptable |
Unacceptable |
| Probable |
Low |
Medium |
High |
High |
Unacceptable |
| Occasional |
Low |
Medium |
Medium |
High |
High |
| Remote |
Low |
Low |
Medium |
Medium |
High |
| Improbable |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Medium |
Medium |
Risk Level Actions:
- Low (Acceptable): Document, no action required
- Medium (ALARP): Consider risk reduction, document rationale
- High (ALARP): Risk reduction required unless ALARP demonstrated
- Unacceptable: Risk reduction mandatory before proceeding
Risk Analysis
Hazard Identification Methods
| Method |
Application |
Standard Reference |
| FMEA |
Component/subsystem failures |
IEC 60812 |
| FTA |
System-level failure analysis |
IEC 61025 |
| HAZOP |
Process hazard identification |
IEC 61882 |
| PHA |
Preliminary hazard assessment |
- |
| Use FMEA |
Use-related hazards |
IEC 62366-1 |
Intended Use Analysis Checklist
| Category |
Questions to Address |
| Medical Purpose |
What condition is treated/diagnosed? |
| Patient Population |
Age, health status, contraindications? |
| User Population |
Healthcare professional, patient, caregiver? |
| Use Environment |
Hospital, home, ambulatory? |
| Duration |
Single use, repeated, continuous? |
| Body Contact |
External, internal, implanted? |
Hazard Categories (Informative Annex C)
| Category |
Examples |
| Energy |
Electrical, thermal, mechanical, radiation |
| Biological |
Bioburden, pyrogens, biocompatibility |
| Chemical |
Residues, degradation products, leachables |
| Operational |
Incorrect output, delayed function, unexpected operation |
| Information |
Incomplete instructions, inadequate warnings |
| Use Environment |
Electromagnetic, mechanical stress |
Hazardous Situation Documentation
HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Product: [Device Name]
Analyst: [Name]
Date: [Date]
| ID | Hazard | Hazardous Situation | Sequence of Events | Harm | P1 | P2 | Initial Risk |
|----|--------|--------------------|--------------------|------|----|----|--------------|
| H-001 | [Hazard] | [Situation] | [Sequence] | [Harm] | [Prob] | [Sev] | [Level] |
P1 = Probability of hazardous situation occurring
P2 = Probability of harm given hazardous situation
Initial Risk = Risk before controls
Risk Estimation
Probability Categories:
| Level |
Term |
Definition |
Frequency |
| 5 |
Frequent |
Expected to occur |
>10⁻³ |
| 4 |
Probable |
Likely to occur |
10⁻³ to 10⁻⁴ |
| 3 |
Occasional |
May occur |
10⁻⁴ to 10⁻⁵ |
| 2 |
Remote |
Unlikely to occur |
10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁶ |
| 1 |
Improbable |
Very unlikely |
<10⁻⁶ |
Severity Categories:
| Level |
Term |
Definition |
Patient Impact |
| 5 |
Catastrophic |
Results in death |
Death |
| 4 |
Critical |
Results in permanent impairment |
Permanent impairment |
| 3 |
Serious |
Results in injury requiring intervention |
Injury requiring treatment |
| 2 |
Minor |
Results in temporary injury |
Temporary discomfort |
| 1 |
Negligible |
Inconvenience or temporary discomfort |
No injury |
Risk Evaluation
Evaluation Workflow
- Apply risk acceptability criteria to estimated risk
- Determine if risk is acceptable, ALARP, or unacceptable
- For ALARP risks, document ALARP demonstration
- For unacceptable risks, proceed to risk control
- Document evaluation rationale
- Validation: All risks evaluated against criteria; rationale documented
Risk Acceptability Decision
| Initial Risk |
Benefit Available |
Decision |
| Acceptable |
N/A |
Accept, document |
| ALARP |
No |
Verify ALARP |
| ALARP |
Yes |
Include in benefit-risk |
| Unacceptable |
No |
Design change required |
| Unacceptable |
Yes |
Benefit-risk analysis |
ALARP Demonstration
| Criterion |
Evidence Required |
| Technical feasibility |
Analysis of alternatives |
| Economic proportionality |
Cost-benefit assessment |
| State of the art |
Review of similar devices |
| User acceptance |
Stakeholder input |
Risk Control
Risk Control Hierarchy
| Priority |
Control Type |
Examples |
| 1 |
Inherent safety by design |
Remove hazard, substitute material |
| 2 |
Protective measures in device |
Guards, alarms, software limits |
| 3 |
Information for safety |
Warnings, training, IFU |
Risk Control Option Analysis
RISK CONTROL OPTION ANALYSIS
Hazard ID: [H-XXX]
Risk Level: [Unacceptable/High]
| Option | Control Type | Effectiveness | Feasibility | New Risks | Selected |
|--------|--------------|---------------|-------------|-----------|----------|
| Option 1 | [Type] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No] | [Yes/No] |
| Option 2 | [Type] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No] | [Yes/No] |
Selected Option: [Option X]
Rationale: [Justification]
Risk Control Implementation Record
RISK CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION
Control ID: RC-[XXX]
Related Hazard: H-[XXX]
Control Description: [Description]
Control Type: [ ] Inherent Safety [ ] Protective Measure [ ] Information
Implementation:
- Specification/Requirement: [Reference]
- Design Document: [Reference]
- Verification Method: [Test/Analysis/Review]
- Verification Criteria: [Pass criteria]
Verification:
- Protocol Reference: [Document]
- Execution Date: [Date]
- Result: [ ] Pass [ ] Fail
- Evidence Reference: [Document]
New Risks Introduced: [ ] Yes [ ] No
If Yes: [New Hazard ID references]
Residual Risk:
- P1: [Probability]
- P2: [Severity]
- Residual Risk Level: [Level]
Approved By: _________________ Date: _______
Risk Control Verification Methods
| Method |
Application |
Evidence |
| Test |
Quantifiable control effectiveness |
Test report |
| Inspection |
Physical control presence |
Inspection record |
| Analysis |
Design analysis confirmation |
Analysis report |
| Review |
Document/drawing review |
Review record |
Overall Residual Risk Evaluation
Evaluation Process
- Compile all individual residual risks
- Consider cumulative effects of residual risks
- Assess overall residual risk acceptability
- Conduct benefit-risk analysis if required
- Document overall evaluation conclusion
- Validation: All residual risks compiled; overall evaluation complete
Benefit-Risk Analysis
| Factor |
Assessment |
| Clinical Benefit |
Documented therapeutic benefit |
| State of the Art |
Comparison to alternative treatments |
| Patient Expectation |
Benefit patient would accept |
| Medical Opinion |
Clinical expert input |
| Risk Quantification |
Residual risk characterization |
Benefit-Risk Documentation
BENEFIT-RISK ANALYSIS
Product: [Device Name]
Date: [Date]
BENEFITS:
1. Primary Clinical Benefit: [Description]
- Evidence: [Reference]
- Magnitude: [Quantification]
2. Secondary Benefits: [List]
RISKS:
1. Residual Risks Summary:
| Risk Category | Count | Highest Level |
|---------------|-------|---------------|
| Acceptable | [N] | Low |
| ALARP | [N] | Medium/High |
2. Cumulative Considerations: [Assessment]
COMPARISON:
- State of the Art: [How device compares]
- Alternative Treatments: [Risk comparison]
- Patient Acceptance: [Expected acceptance]
CONCLUSION:
[ ] Benefits outweigh risks - Acceptable
[ ] Benefits do not outweigh risks - Not Acceptable
Rationale: [Justification]
Approved By: _________________ Date: _______
Risk Management Report
Report Content Requirements
| Section |
Content |
| Results of Risk Analysis |
Summary of hazards and risks identified |
| Risk Control Decisions |
Controls selected and implemented |
| Overall Residual Risk |
Evaluation and acceptability conclusion |
| Benefit-Risk Conclusion |
If applicable |
| Review and Approval |
Formal sign-off |
Risk Management Report Template
RISK MANAGEMENT REPORT
Document Number: RMR-[Product]-[Rev]
Product: [Device Name]
Date: [Date]
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Total hazards identified: [N]
- Risk controls implemented: [N]
- Residual risks: [N] acceptable, [N] ALARP
- Overall conclusion: [Acceptable/Not Acceptable]
2. RISK ANALYSIS SUMMARY
- Methods used: [FMEA, FTA, etc.]
- Scope coverage: [Lifecycle stages]
- Hazard categories addressed: [List]
3. RISK EVALUATION SUMMARY
| Risk Level | Before Control | After Control |
|------------|----------------|---------------|
| Unacceptable | [N] | [N] |
| High | [N] | [N] |
| Medium | [N] | [N] |
| Low | [N] | [N] |
4. RISK CONTROL SUMMARY
- Inherent safety controls: [N]
- Protective measures: [N]
- Information for safety: [N]
- All controls verified: [Yes/No]
5. OVERALL RESIDUAL RISK
- Individual residual risks: [Summary]
- Cumulative assessment: [Conclusion]
- Acceptability: [Acceptable/ALARP demonstrated]
6. BENEFIT-RISK ANALYSIS (if applicable)
- Conclusion: [Statement]
7. PRODUCTION AND POST-PRODUCTION
- Monitoring plan: [Reference]
- Review triggers: [List]
8. CONCLUSION
[Statement of overall risk acceptability]
9. APPROVAL
Risk Management Lead: _________________ Date: _______
Quality Assurance: _________________ Date: _______
Management Representative: _________________ Date: _______
Production and Post-Production Activities
Information Sources
| Source |
Information Type |
Review Frequency |
| Complaints |
Use-related issues, failures |
Continuous |
| Service Reports |
Field failures, repairs |
Monthly |
| Vigilance Reports |
Serious incidents |
Immediate |
| Literature |
Similar device issues |
Quarterly |
| Regulatory Feedback |
Authority communications |
As received |
| Clinical Data |
Post-market clinical follow-up |
Per PMCF plan |
Risk Management File Update Triggers
| Trigger |
Action Required |
| New hazard identified |
Risk analysis update |
| Control failure |
Risk control reassessment |
| Serious incident |
Immediate risk review |
| Design change |
Impact assessment |
| Standards update |
Compliance review |
| Regulatory feedback |
Risk evaluation update |
Risk Management Review Record
RISK MANAGEMENT REVIEW RECORD
Review Date: [Date]
Review Type: [ ] Periodic [ ] Triggered
Trigger (if applicable): [Description]
INFORMATION REVIEWED:
| Source | Period | Findings |
|--------|--------|----------|
| Complaints | [Period] | [Summary] |
| Vigilance | [Period] | [Summary] |
| Literature | [Period] | [Summary] |
RISK MANAGEMENT FILE STATUS:
- Current and complete: [ ] Yes [ ] No
- Updates required: [ ] Yes [ ] No
ACTIONS:
| Action | Owner | Due Date |
|--------|-------|----------|
| [Action 1] | [Name] | [Date] |
CONCLUSION:
[ ] No changes to risk profile
[ ] Risk profile updated - see [Document Reference]
[ ] Further investigation required
Reviewed By: _________________ Date: _______
1---2name: 858-iso14971-implementation-guide-5fc9a1473description: ISO 14971:2019 Implementation Guide4---5# ISO 14971:2019 Implementation Guide67Complete implementation framework for medical device risk management per ISO 14971:2019.89---1011## Table of Contents1213- [Risk Management Planning](#risk-management-planning)14- [Risk Analysis](#risk-analysis)15- [Risk Evaluation](#risk-evaluation)16- [Risk Control](#risk-control)17- [Overall Residual Risk Evaluation](#overall-residual-risk-evaluation)18- [Risk Management Report](#risk-management-report)19- [Production and Post-Production Activities](#production-and-post-production-activities)2021---2223## Risk Management Planning2425### Risk Management Plan Content2627| Element | Requirement | Documentation |28|---------|-------------|---------------|29| Scope | Medical device and lifecycle stages covered | Scope statement |30| Responsibilities | Personnel and authority assignments | Organization chart, RACI |31| Review Requirements | Timing and triggers for reviews | Review schedule |32| Acceptability Criteria | Risk acceptance matrix and policy | Risk acceptability criteria |33| Verification Activities | Methods for control verification | Verification plan |34| Production/Post-Production | Activities for ongoing risk management | Surveillance plan |3536### Risk Management Plan Template3738```39RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN4041Document Number: RMP-[Product]-[Rev]42Product: [Device Name]43Revision: [X.X]44Effective Date: [Date]45461. SCOPE AND PURPOSE47 1.1 Medical Device Description: [Description]48 1.2 Intended Use: [Statement]49 1.3 Lifecycle Stages Covered: [Design/Production/Post-Market]50 1.4 Plan Objectives: [Objectives]51522. RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES53 | Role | Responsibility | Authority |54 |------|----------------|-----------|55 | Risk Management Lead | Overall RM process | RM decisions |56 | Design Engineer | Risk identification | Design changes |57 | QA Manager | RM file review | File approval |58 | Clinical | Clinical input | Clinical risk assessment |59603. RISK ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA61 3.1 Risk Matrix: [Reference to matrix]62 3.2 Acceptability Policy: [Acceptable/ALARP/Unacceptable definitions]63 3.3 Benefit-Risk Considerations: [When applicable]64654. VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES66 4.1 Risk Control Verification Methods: [Test, Analysis, Review]67 4.2 Verification Timing: [Design phase, V&V]68 4.3 Acceptance Criteria: [Pass/fail criteria]69705. PRODUCTION AND POST-PRODUCTION71 5.1 Information Collection: [Sources]72 5.2 Review Triggers: [Events requiring review]73 5.3 Update Process: [RM file update procedure]74756. REVIEW AND APPROVAL76 Prepared By: _________________ Date: _______77 Reviewed By: _________________ Date: _______78 Approved By: _________________ Date: _______79```8081### Risk Acceptability Criteria Definition8283| Risk Level | Definition | Action Required |84|------------|------------|-----------------|85| Broadly Acceptable | Risk so low that no action needed | Document and monitor |86| ALARP (Tolerable) | Risk reduced as low as reasonably practicable | Verify ALARP, consider benefit |87| Unacceptable | Risk exceeds acceptable threshold | Risk control mandatory |8889### Risk Matrix Example (5x5)9091| Probability \ Severity | Negligible | Minor | Serious | Critical | Catastrophic |92|------------------------|------------|-------|---------|----------|--------------|93| Frequent | Medium | High | High | Unacceptable | Unacceptable |94| Probable | Low | Medium | High | High | Unacceptable |95| Occasional | Low | Medium | Medium | High | High |96| Remote | Low | Low | Medium | Medium | High |97| Improbable | Low | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |9899**Risk Level Actions:**100- **Low (Acceptable):** Document, no action required101- **Medium (ALARP):** Consider risk reduction, document rationale102- **High (ALARP):** Risk reduction required unless ALARP demonstrated103- **Unacceptable:** Risk reduction mandatory before proceeding104105---106107## Risk Analysis108109### Hazard Identification Methods110111| Method | Application | Standard Reference |112|--------|-------------|-------------------|113| FMEA | Component/subsystem failures | IEC 60812 |114| FTA | System-level failure analysis | IEC 61025 |115| HAZOP | Process hazard identification | IEC 61882 |116| PHA | Preliminary hazard assessment | - |117| Use FMEA | Use-related hazards | IEC 62366-1 |118119### Intended Use Analysis Checklist120121| Category | Questions to Address |122|----------|---------------------|123| Medical Purpose | What condition is treated/diagnosed? |124| Patient Population | Age, health status, contraindications? |125| User Population | Healthcare professional, patient, caregiver? |126| Use Environment | Hospital, home, ambulatory? |127| Duration | Single use, repeated, continuous? |128| Body Contact | External, internal, implanted? |129130### Hazard Categories (Informative Annex C)131132| Category | Examples |133|----------|----------|134| Energy | Electrical, thermal, mechanical, radiation |135| Biological | Bioburden, pyrogens, biocompatibility |136| Chemical | Residues, degradation products, leachables |137| Operational | Incorrect output, delayed function, unexpected operation |138| Information | Incomplete instructions, inadequate warnings |139| Use Environment | Electromagnetic, mechanical stress |140141### Hazardous Situation Documentation142143```144HAZARD ANALYSIS WORKSHEET145146Product: [Device Name]147Analyst: [Name]148Date: [Date]149150| ID | Hazard | Hazardous Situation | Sequence of Events | Harm | P1 | P2 | Initial Risk |151|----|--------|--------------------|--------------------|------|----|----|--------------|152| H-001 | [Hazard] | [Situation] | [Sequence] | [Harm] | [Prob] | [Sev] | [Level] |153154P1 = Probability of hazardous situation occurring155P2 = Probability of harm given hazardous situation156Initial Risk = Risk before controls157```158159### Risk Estimation160161**Probability Categories:**162163| Level | Term | Definition | Frequency |164|-------|------|------------|-----------|165| 5 | Frequent | Expected to occur | >10⁻³ |166| 4 | Probable | Likely to occur | 10⁻³ to 10⁻⁴ |167| 3 | Occasional | May occur | 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻⁵ |168| 2 | Remote | Unlikely to occur | 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁶ |169| 1 | Improbable | Very unlikely | <10⁻⁶ |170171**Severity Categories:**172173| Level | Term | Definition | Patient Impact |174|-------|------|------------|----------------|175| 5 | Catastrophic | Results in death | Death |176| 4 | Critical | Results in permanent impairment | Permanent impairment |177| 3 | Serious | Results in injury requiring intervention | Injury requiring treatment |178| 2 | Minor | Results in temporary injury | Temporary discomfort |179| 1 | Negligible | Inconvenience or temporary discomfort | No injury |180181---182183## Risk Evaluation184185### Evaluation Workflow1861871. Apply risk acceptability criteria to estimated risk1882. Determine if risk is acceptable, ALARP, or unacceptable1893. For ALARP risks, document ALARP demonstration1904. For unacceptable risks, proceed to risk control1915. Document evaluation rationale1926. **Validation:** All risks evaluated against criteria; rationale documented193194### Risk Acceptability Decision195196| Initial Risk | Benefit Available | Decision |197|--------------|-------------------|----------|198| Acceptable | N/A | Accept, document |199| ALARP | No | Verify ALARP |200| ALARP | Yes | Include in benefit-risk |201| Unacceptable | No | Design change required |202| Unacceptable | Yes | Benefit-risk analysis |203204### ALARP Demonstration205206| Criterion | Evidence Required |207|-----------|-------------------|208| Technical feasibility | Analysis of alternatives |209| Economic proportionality | Cost-benefit assessment |210| State of the art | Review of similar devices |211| User acceptance | Stakeholder input |212213---214215## Risk Control216217### Risk Control Hierarchy218219| Priority | Control Type | Examples |220|----------|--------------|----------|221| 1 | Inherent safety by design | Remove hazard, substitute material |222| 2 | Protective measures in device | Guards, alarms, software limits |223| 3 | Information for safety | Warnings, training, IFU |224225### Risk Control Option Analysis226227```228RISK CONTROL OPTION ANALYSIS229230Hazard ID: [H-XXX]231Risk Level: [Unacceptable/High]232233| Option | Control Type | Effectiveness | Feasibility | New Risks | Selected |234|--------|--------------|---------------|-------------|-----------|----------|235| Option 1 | [Type] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No] | [Yes/No] |236| Option 2 | [Type] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No] | [Yes/No] |237238Selected Option: [Option X]239Rationale: [Justification]240```241242### Risk Control Implementation Record243244```245RISK CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION246247Control ID: RC-[XXX]248Related Hazard: H-[XXX]249250Control Description: [Description]251Control Type: [ ] Inherent Safety [ ] Protective Measure [ ] Information252253Implementation:254- Specification/Requirement: [Reference]255- Design Document: [Reference]256- Verification Method: [Test/Analysis/Review]257- Verification Criteria: [Pass criteria]258259Verification:260- Protocol Reference: [Document]261- Execution Date: [Date]262- Result: [ ] Pass [ ] Fail263- Evidence Reference: [Document]264265New Risks Introduced: [ ] Yes [ ] No266If Yes: [New Hazard ID references]267268Residual Risk:269- P1: [Probability]270- P2: [Severity]271- Residual Risk Level: [Level]272273Approved By: _________________ Date: _______274```275276### Risk Control Verification Methods277278| Method | Application | Evidence |279|--------|-------------|----------|280| Test | Quantifiable control effectiveness | Test report |281| Inspection | Physical control presence | Inspection record |282| Analysis | Design analysis confirmation | Analysis report |283| Review | Document/drawing review | Review record |284285---286287## Overall Residual Risk Evaluation288289### Evaluation Process2902911. Compile all individual residual risks2922. Consider cumulative effects of residual risks2933. Assess overall residual risk acceptability2944. Conduct benefit-risk analysis if required2955. Document overall evaluation conclusion2966. **Validation:** All residual risks compiled; overall evaluation complete297298### Benefit-Risk Analysis299300| Factor | Assessment |301|--------|------------|302| Clinical Benefit | Documented therapeutic benefit |303| State of the Art | Comparison to alternative treatments |304| Patient Expectation | Benefit patient would accept |305| Medical Opinion | Clinical expert input |306| Risk Quantification | Residual risk characterization |307308### Benefit-Risk Documentation309310```311BENEFIT-RISK ANALYSIS312313Product: [Device Name]314Date: [Date]315316BENEFITS:3171. Primary Clinical Benefit: [Description]318 - Evidence: [Reference]319 - Magnitude: [Quantification]3203212. Secondary Benefits: [List]322323RISKS:3241. Residual Risks Summary:325 | Risk Category | Count | Highest Level |326 |---------------|-------|---------------|327 | Acceptable | [N] | Low |328 | ALARP | [N] | Medium/High |3293302. Cumulative Considerations: [Assessment]331332COMPARISON:333- State of the Art: [How device compares]334- Alternative Treatments: [Risk comparison]335- Patient Acceptance: [Expected acceptance]336337CONCLUSION:338[ ] Benefits outweigh risks - Acceptable339[ ] Benefits do not outweigh risks - Not Acceptable340341Rationale: [Justification]342343Approved By: _________________ Date: _______344```345346---347348## Risk Management Report349350### Report Content Requirements351352| Section | Content |353|---------|---------|354| Results of Risk Analysis | Summary of hazards and risks identified |355| Risk Control Decisions | Controls selected and implemented |356| Overall Residual Risk | Evaluation and acceptability conclusion |357| Benefit-Risk Conclusion | If applicable |358| Review and Approval | Formal sign-off |359360### Risk Management Report Template361362```363RISK MANAGEMENT REPORT364365Document Number: RMR-[Product]-[Rev]366Product: [Device Name]367Date: [Date]3683691. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY370 - Total hazards identified: [N]371 - Risk controls implemented: [N]372 - Residual risks: [N] acceptable, [N] ALARP373 - Overall conclusion: [Acceptable/Not Acceptable]3743752. RISK ANALYSIS SUMMARY376 - Methods used: [FMEA, FTA, etc.]377 - Scope coverage: [Lifecycle stages]378 - Hazard categories addressed: [List]3793803. RISK EVALUATION SUMMARY381 | Risk Level | Before Control | After Control |382 |------------|----------------|---------------|383 | Unacceptable | [N] | [N] |384 | High | [N] | [N] |385 | Medium | [N] | [N] |386 | Low | [N] | [N] |3873884. RISK CONTROL SUMMARY389 - Inherent safety controls: [N]390 - Protective measures: [N]391 - Information for safety: [N]392 - All controls verified: [Yes/No]3933945. OVERALL RESIDUAL RISK395 - Individual residual risks: [Summary]396 - Cumulative assessment: [Conclusion]397 - Acceptability: [Acceptable/ALARP demonstrated]3983996. BENEFIT-RISK ANALYSIS (if applicable)400 - Conclusion: [Statement]4014027. PRODUCTION AND POST-PRODUCTION403 - Monitoring plan: [Reference]404 - Review triggers: [List]4054068. CONCLUSION407 [Statement of overall risk acceptability]4084099. APPROVAL410 Risk Management Lead: _________________ Date: _______411 Quality Assurance: _________________ Date: _______412 Management Representative: _________________ Date: _______413```414415---416417## Production and Post-Production Activities418419### Information Sources420421| Source | Information Type | Review Frequency |422|--------|------------------|------------------|423| Complaints | Use-related issues, failures | Continuous |424| Service Reports | Field failures, repairs | Monthly |425| Vigilance Reports | Serious incidents | Immediate |426| Literature | Similar device issues | Quarterly |427| Regulatory Feedback | Authority communications | As received |428| Clinical Data | Post-market clinical follow-up | Per PMCF plan |429430### Risk Management File Update Triggers431432| Trigger | Action Required |433|---------|-----------------|434| New hazard identified | Risk analysis update |435| Control failure | Risk control reassessment |436| Serious incident | Immediate risk review |437| Design change | Impact assessment |438| Standards update | Compliance review |439| Regulatory feedback | Risk evaluation update |440441### Risk Management Review Record442443```444RISK MANAGEMENT REVIEW RECORD445446Review Date: [Date]447Review Type: [ ] Periodic [ ] Triggered448Trigger (if applicable): [Description]449450INFORMATION REVIEWED:451| Source | Period | Findings |452|--------|--------|----------|453| Complaints | [Period] | [Summary] |454| Vigilance | [Period] | [Summary] |455| Literature | [Period] | [Summary] |456457RISK MANAGEMENT FILE STATUS:458- Current and complete: [ ] Yes [ ] No459- Updates required: [ ] Yes [ ] No460461ACTIONS:462| Action | Owner | Due Date |463|--------|-------|----------|464| [Action 1] | [Name] | [Date] |465466CONCLUSION:467[ ] No changes to risk profile468[ ] Risk profile updated - see [Document Reference]469[ ] Further investigation required470471Reviewed By: _________________ Date: _______472```