Germany (DSGVO + BDSG + TDDDG)
Table of Contents
- Legal Framework
- Supervisory Authorities
- Language & Formalities
- Legal Bases — German Specifics
- Retention Periods
- Cookie & Tracking Rules (TDDDG)
- Children's Data
- DPO Requirements
- Standard Wording Templates
Legal Framework
| Law | Scope |
|---|---|
| DSGVO (= GDPR) | Directly applicable EU regulation |
| BDSG (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz) | Federal supplementary law; employee data (§ 26), DPO (§ 38), scoring (§ 31), video surveillance (§ 4) |
| TDDDG (Telekommunikation-Digitale-Dienste-Datenschutz-Gesetz) | Cookie consent (§ 25), telecom/digital services privacy — replaced TTDSG (which had replaced TMG/TKG provisions) |
| UWG (Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb) | Relevant for direct marketing / commercial email consent |
| HGB / AO | Commercial and tax law retention obligations |
Supervisory Authorities
Germany has 18 supervisory authorities (1 federal BfDI + 16 Landesdatenschutzbeauftragte + 1 church-specific BfD EKD).
When drafting, reference the correct authority based on the controller's registered seat:
| State | Authority | Abbreviation |
|---|---|---|
| Federal (telecom, postal, federal bodies) | BfDI | Bundesbeauftragter für den Datenschutz |
| Baden-Württemberg | LfDI BW | |
| Bayern (private sector) | BayLDA | Bayerisches Landesamt für Datenschutzaufsicht |
| Bayern (public sector) | BayLfD | |
| Berlin | BlnBDI | |
| Brandenburg | LDA Brandenburg | |
| Bremen | LfDI Bremen | |
| Hamburg | HmbBfDI | |
| Hessen | HBDI | |
| Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | LfDI M-V | |
| Niedersachsen | LfD Niedersachsen | |
| Nordrhein-Westfalen | LDI NRW | |
| Rheinland-Pfalz | LfDI RLP | |
| Saarland | ULD Saarland | |
| Sachsen | SächsDSB | |
| Sachsen-Anhalt | LfD LSA | |
| Schleswig-Holstein | ULD | |
| Thüringen | TLfDI |
Include the complaint right with the correct authority name and URL.
Language & Formalities
- Privacy notice MUST be in German if targeting German users
- "Sie" (formal) is standard; "Du" only if brand consistently uses informal tone
- Bilingual notices (DE + EN) recommended for international services
- Impressum (§ 5 TMG / DDG) is legally separate but often linked alongside
- Common title: "Datenschutzerklärung" (not "Datenschutzrichtlinie")
- Must be accessible with max 2 clicks from any page (BGH ruling)
Legal Bases
Employee Data (§ 26 BDSG)
If the privacy notice covers employees (e.g., career portals, applicant tracking):
- Legal basis: § 26 Abs. 1 BDSG (processing necessary for employment relationship)
- Special categories: § 26 Abs. 3 BDSG (explicit consent or necessity)
- Works council agreements can serve as legal basis
Special Category Data (§ 26(3) BDSG + Art. 9 DSGVO)
German employment law creates several common Art. 9 processing scenarios:
- Church tax (Kirchensteuer): Religion is Art. 9 data. Legal basis: Art. 6(1)(c) + Art. 9(2)(b) DSGVO + § 26(3) BDSG + § 51a EStG. Employer must process religious affiliation for payroll; disclose in notice.
- Disability status (Schwerbehinderung): Health data under Art. 9. Legal basis: Art. 6(1)(c) + Art. 9(2)(b) DSGVO + § 26(3) BDSG + §§ 164, 168 SGB IX. Required for additional leave, special dismissal protection.
- Sick leave certificates (AU-Bescheinigungen): Health data. Legal basis: Art. 6(1)(c) + Art. 9(2)(b) DSGVO + § 26(3) BDSG + § 5 EFZG. Retention: typically 1 year after end of calendar year.
- Occupational integration management (BEM): Health data. Legal basis: Art. 6(1)(c) + Art. 9(2)(b) DSGVO + § 26(3) BDSG + § 167(2) SGB IX. BEM files must be stored separately from personnel file.
- Trade union dues: Trade union membership is Art. 9 data. If deducted via payroll: Art. 6(1)(b)/(c) + Art. 9(2)(b) DSGVO + § 26(3) BDSG.
- Biometric access control: Fingerprint/facial recognition for building access. Art. 9(2)(a) explicit consent typically required (§ 26(3) Satz 2 BDSG). Works council co-determination applies (§ 87(1) Nr. 6 BetrVG). DPIA recommended.
Video Surveillance (§ 4 BDSG)
If premises are monitored:
- Separate notice required at the entrance
- Art. 6(1)(f) DSGVO + § 4 BDSG
- Retention: typically 48–72 hours, max justified by purpose
Scoring & Creditworthiness (§ 31 BDSG)
Relevant for e-commerce or financial services with credit checks.
Consent under TDDDG § 25
- Cookie/tracking consent follows TDDDG § 25 (implementing ePrivacy Directive Art. 5(3))
- Consent must meet DSGVO Art. 7 standards
- Planet49 (CJEU) and Cookie-Einwilligung II (BGH) case law applies
Retention Periods
| Data Category | Duration | Legal Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial correspondence | 6 years | § 257 HGB |
| Tax-relevant records, invoices | 10 years | § 147 AO, § 257 HGB |
| Applicant data (rejected) | 6 months after rejection | AGG statute of limitations |
| Employee data | Duration of employment + 3 years (limitation) | § 26 BDSG |
| Server log files | 7–30 days | Art. 6(1)(f) DSGVO |
| Contract data | Duration + 3 years (general limitation) | §§ 195, 199 BGB |
| Active customer account | Duration of relationship | Art. 6(1)(b) DSGVO |
| Inactive prospects | 3 years without interaction | Art. 6(1)(f) — balancing test |
| Cookie consent records | 3 years (proof of consent) | Art. 7(1) DSGVO |
| CCTV footage | 48–72 hours (standard), justified max | § 4 BDSG |
| Telecom traffic data | 10 weeks (§ 176 TKG) | TDDDG/TKG |
Cookie & Tracking Rules
TDDDG § 25 Framework
- Consent required for any access to or storage of information on end-user devices UNLESS strictly necessary
- "Strictly necessary" is narrowly interpreted (session cookies, cart, load balancer — yes; analytics, ads — no)
- Server-side analytics (e.g., Matomo without cookies) may fall outside § 25 scope but still require Art. 6(1)(f) assessment
- Consent banner must offer reject all equally prominent as accept all (Planet49, BGH)
Common German CMP Solutions
Usercentrics, Cookiebot, Consentmanager, Borlabs Cookie (WordPress)
Google Analytics Specific
The DSK (Datenschutzkonferenz) has repeatedly raised concerns. If used:
- Ensure Google Analytics 4 with IP anonymization
- Server-side tagging preferred
- Consent required (no legitimate interest)
- Consider Matomo/Plausible as compliant alternatives
Children's Data
- GDPR Art. 8 threshold: Germany sets 16 years (§ 2 Nr. 17 TDDDG, national implementation)
- If service targets minors: parental consent mechanism required
- Privacy notice must use age-appropriate language
DPO Requirements
Mandatory DPO (§ 38 BDSG)
- ≥ 20 persons constantly engaged in automated processing
- Core activity: large-scale processing of special categories (Art. 9/10 DSGVO)
- Core activity: systematic monitoring (Art. 37(1)(c) DSGVO)
Always include DPO contact in the privacy notice if appointed. Use functional email (datenschutz@..., dpo@...).
Standard Wording
Complaint Right (German)
Sie haben das Recht, sich bei einer Datenschutzaufsichtsbehörde über die Verarbeitung Ihrer personenbezogenen Daten zu beschweren. Die für uns zuständige Aufsichtsbehörde ist:
[Name der Aufsichtsbehörde]
[Adresse]
[URL]
Right to Object (Art. 21 — mandatory separate notice)
WIDERSPRUCHSRECHT
Sie haben das Recht, aus Gründen, die sich aus Ihrer besonderen Situation ergeben, jederzeit gegen die Verarbeitung Sie betreffender personenbezogener Daten, die auf Grundlage von Art. 6 Abs. 1 lit. e oder f DSGVO erfolgt, Widerspruch einzulegen.
Werden Ihre personenbezogenen Daten verarbeitet, um Direktwerbung zu betreiben, haben Sie das Recht, jederzeit Widerspruch gegen die Verarbeitung einzulegen.
Responsible Party Intro (German)
Verantwortlich im Sinne der Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DSGVO) ist:
[Firmenname]
[Rechtsform]
[Straße, PLZ Ort]
Vertreten durch: [Geschäftsführer/Vorstand]
E-Mail: [E-Mail]
Telefon: [Telefon]