Creating Ideas
Expert knowledge of ideation methodologies, lateral thinking, and creative problem-solving. Grounded in de Bono (lateral thinking, Six Hats), Osborn (brainstorming, SCAMPER), design thinking, and first principles reasoning.
Mode Detection
| User Says |
Mode |
| "brainstorm", "generate ideas", "think creatively", "fresh perspective" |
APPLY |
| "is this idea good", "evaluate concept", "how original is this" |
AUDIT |
| "stuck", "no ideas", "concept isn't working", "make this more creative" |
FIX |
If ambiguous: "APPLY creative frameworks, AUDIT existing ideas, or FIX creative blocks?"
Relationship to rsn-reasoning-problems
This skill generates ideas. For reasoning about ideas once generated:
- Use rsn-reasoning-problems.dialectical to evaluate trade-offs
- Use rsn-reasoning-problems.analogical for deeper domain transfer analysis
- Use rsn-reasoning-problems.causal to plan execution
APPLY Mode
Core Principles
| Principle |
One-Liner |
| Diverge then Converge |
Generate many ideas first, evaluate later |
| Suspend Judgment |
"Yes, and..." not "No, but..." during ideation |
| Quantity Breeds Quality |
More ideas → higher chance of breakthrough |
| Combine and Build |
Best ideas often merge multiple concepts |
| Challenge Assumptions |
Question every "obvious" constraint |
Top 10 Techniques
- First Principles: Strip to fundamentals, rebuild from truth
- SCAMPER: Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to other uses, Eliminate, Reverse
- Lateral Thinking: Escape dominant patterns via provocation
- Analogical Transfer: Borrow solutions from other domains
- Constraint Manipulation: Remove, add, or flip constraints
- Random Stimulation: Force connections with unrelated inputs
- Reverse Brainstorming: "How could we make this worse?"
- Worst Possible Idea: Start terrible, extract useful elements
- Six Thinking Hats: Structured parallel thinking perspectives
- Morphological Analysis: Systematic combination of attributes
Full catalog: references/patterns.md
Process
- Define challenge — What problem are we solving? What does success look like?
- Gather inputs — Current constraints, past attempts, domain knowledge
- Select technique(s) — Match technique to problem type
- Diverge — Generate 10-50+ ideas without judgment
- Incubate — Allow unconscious processing if time permits
- Converge — Cluster, combine, evaluate, select
- Develop — Strengthen selected ideas
Output Format
## Creative Exploration: [Challenge]
### Challenge Reframe
- Original: [How it was stated]
- Reframed: [More generative framing]
### Technique Applied: [Name]
### Ideas Generated
1. **[Idea Name]**: [One-line description]
- Mechanism: [How it works]
- Novel element: [What's new]
[Repeat for top ideas]
### Combinations Worth Exploring
- [Idea A] + [Idea B] → [Combined concept]
### Recommended Next Steps
1. [Most promising direction]
AUDIT Mode
Evaluation Dimensions
| Dimension |
Check |
| Originality |
Is this genuinely new or recombined familiar? |
| Feasibility |
Can this actually be built/implemented? |
| Value |
Does this solve a real problem meaningfully? |
| Clarity |
Is the concept clear and communicable? |
| Defensibility |
Can competitors easily copy this? |
| Scalability |
Does this grow or stay niche? |
Full rubric with 0-3 criteria: references/audit-rubric.md
Process
- Understand the idea — Can you explain it simply?
- Score dimensions — 0-3 on each criterion
- Identify strengths — What's working?
- Identify gaps — What's missing or weak?
- Suggest improvements — How to strengthen?
Output Format
## Idea Audit: [Concept Name]
**Score:** X/18 | **Verdict:** [Breakthrough/Promising/Incremental/Weak]
### Dimension Scores
| Dimension | Score | Assessment |
|-----------|-------|------------|
| Originality | /3 | [Finding] |
| Feasibility | /3 | [Finding] |
| Value | /3 | [Finding] |
| Clarity | /3 | [Finding] |
| Defensibility | /3 | [Finding] |
| Scalability | /3 | [Finding] |
### Strengths
- [What's working]
### Gaps
- [What's missing]
### Enhancement Recommendations
1. [Specific improvement]
FIX Mode
Common Creative Blocks
| Block |
Symptom |
Fix Technique |
| Functional Fixedness |
Can only see obvious uses |
Analogical transfer, SCAMPER |
| Einstellung Effect |
Stuck on first solution |
Constraint removal, reverse brainstorm |
| Analysis Paralysis |
Overthinking, no output |
Worst idea first, time pressure |
| Premature Judgment |
Killing ideas too early |
Diverge/converge separation |
| Domain Blindness |
Only seeing industry norms |
Random stimulation, cross-domain |
| Scope Creep |
Idea too complex |
First principles, constraint addition |
Diagnostic Process
- Identify block type — What's preventing progress?
- Select antidote technique — Match technique to block
- Apply technique — Generate new options
- Extract value — What's useful in the output?
- Iterate — Refine or try another technique
Idea Strengthening Process
- Isolate weakness — What specifically is weak?
- Diagnose cause — Why is it weak?
- Apply targeted fix — Specific enhancement
- Validate improvement — Re-audit the idea
Output Format
## Creative Fix: [Problem/Block]
### Diagnosis
- **Block type:** [Category]
- **Symptom:** [What's happening]
- **Root cause:** [Why it's happening]
### Technique Applied: [Name]
### Before
[Original state/idea]
### After
[Improved state/ideas]
### What Changed
- [Specific improvement and why it helps]
Examples: references/examples.md
Technique Selection Guide
| Problem Type |
Best Techniques |
| Need more ideas |
SCAMPER, Random Stimulation, Worst Idea |
| Stuck on one solution |
Constraint Manipulation, Reverse Brainstorm |
| Need breakthrough |
First Principles, Analogical Transfer |
| Too many ideas |
Six Hats evaluation, Morphological narrowing |
| Idea too vague |
First Principles, Constraint Addition |
| Idea too complex |
Elimination, Core extraction |
| Need team alignment |
Six Thinking Hats, structured brainstorm |
Failure Handling
| Situation |
Action |
| Technique produces nothing useful |
Switch technique; try opposite approach |
| All ideas seem bad |
Use "Worst Idea" to lower pressure; extract elements |
| Can't escape existing solution |
Add extreme constraint; remove core assumption |
| Ideas too incremental |
Ask "What would 10x require?"; analogize from distant domain |
| Overwhelmed by options |
Apply Six Hats structure; force ranking |
| Time pressure |
Use rapid SCAMPER (30 seconds per letter) |
Anti-patterns: references/anti-patterns.md
Boundaries
In scope:
- Ideation and brainstorming
- Problem reframing
- Creative problem-solving
- Concept development
- Breaking mental blocks
- Innovation methodologies
Out of scope:
- Implementation planning (use rsn-reasoning-problems.causal)
- Market validation (use rsn-perceiving-information)
- Visual/artistic design
- Technical feasibility deep-dive
References
| File |
Content |
| patterns.md |
Full technique catalog |
| audit-rubric.md |
Detailed scoring criteria |
| anti-patterns.md |
What to avoid |
| examples.md |
Worked examples |
1---2name: rsn-creating-ideas3description: Generates novel ideas and creative solutions to problems. Applies lateral thinking, SCAMPER, first principles, and ideation frameworks to break conventional patterns. Audits ideas for originality, feasibility, and creative quality. Fixes creative blocks and strengthens weak concepts. Use when brainstorming, stuck on a problem, need fresh perspectives, or breaking conventional thinking. Triggers on "brainstorm", "generate ideas", "think creatively", "stuck", "fresh perspective".4license: Complete terms in LICENSE.txt5---6
7# Creating Ideas
8
9Expert knowledge of ideation methodologies, lateral thinking, and creative problem-solving. Grounded in de Bono (lateral thinking, Six Hats), Osborn (brainstorming, SCAMPER), design thinking, and first principles reasoning.
10
11## Mode Detection
12
13| User Says | Mode |
14|-----------|------|
15| "brainstorm", "generate ideas", "think creatively", "fresh perspective" | APPLY |
16| "is this idea good", "evaluate concept", "how original is this" | AUDIT |
17| "stuck", "no ideas", "concept isn't working", "make this more creative" | FIX |
18
19If ambiguous: "APPLY creative frameworks, AUDIT existing ideas, or FIX creative blocks?"
20
21## Relationship to rsn-reasoning-problems
22
23This skill generates ideas. For reasoning about ideas once generated:
24- Use rsn-reasoning-problems.dialectical to evaluate trade-offs
25- Use rsn-reasoning-problems.analogical for deeper domain transfer analysis
26- Use rsn-reasoning-problems.causal to plan execution
27
28---
29
30## APPLY Mode
31
32### Core Principles
33
34| Principle | One-Liner |
35|-----------|-----------|
36| **Diverge then Converge** | Generate many ideas first, evaluate later |
37| **Suspend Judgment** | "Yes, and..." not "No, but..." during ideation |
38| **Quantity Breeds Quality** | More ideas → higher chance of breakthrough |
39| **Combine and Build** | Best ideas often merge multiple concepts |
40| **Challenge Assumptions** | Question every "obvious" constraint |
41
42### Top 10 Techniques
43
441. **First Principles**: Strip to fundamentals, rebuild from truth
452. **SCAMPER**: Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to other uses, Eliminate, Reverse
463. **Lateral Thinking**: Escape dominant patterns via provocation
474. **Analogical Transfer**: Borrow solutions from other domains
485. **Constraint Manipulation**: Remove, add, or flip constraints
496. **Random Stimulation**: Force connections with unrelated inputs
507. **Reverse Brainstorming**: "How could we make this worse?"
518. **Worst Possible Idea**: Start terrible, extract useful elements
529. **Six Thinking Hats**: Structured parallel thinking perspectives
5310. **Morphological Analysis**: Systematic combination of attributes
54
55Full catalog: [references/patterns.md](references/patterns.md)
56
57### Process
58
591. **Define challenge** — What problem are we solving? What does success look like?
602. **Gather inputs** — Current constraints, past attempts, domain knowledge
613. **Select technique(s)** — Match technique to problem type
624. **Diverge** — Generate 10-50+ ideas without judgment
635. **Incubate** — Allow unconscious processing if time permits
646. **Converge** — Cluster, combine, evaluate, select
657. **Develop** — Strengthen selected ideas
66
67### Output Format
68
69```markdown
70## Creative Exploration: [Challenge]
71
72### Challenge Reframe
73- Original: [How it was stated]
74- Reframed: [More generative framing]
75
76### Technique Applied: [Name]
77
78### Ideas Generated
791. **[Idea Name]**: [One-line description]
80 - Mechanism: [How it works]
81 - Novel element: [What's new]
82
83[Repeat for top ideas]
84
85### Combinations Worth Exploring
86- [Idea A] + [Idea B] → [Combined concept]
87
88### Recommended Next Steps
891. [Most promising direction]
90```
91
92---
93
94## AUDIT Mode
95
96### Evaluation Dimensions
97
98| Dimension | Check |
99|-----------|-------|
100| **Originality** | Is this genuinely new or recombined familiar? |
101| **Feasibility** | Can this actually be built/implemented? |
102| **Value** | Does this solve a real problem meaningfully? |
103| **Clarity** | Is the concept clear and communicable? |
104| **Defensibility** | Can competitors easily copy this? |
105| **Scalability** | Does this grow or stay niche? |
106
107Full rubric with 0-3 criteria: [references/audit-rubric.md](references/audit-rubric.md)
108
109### Process
110
1111. **Understand the idea** — Can you explain it simply?
1122. **Score dimensions** — 0-3 on each criterion
1133. **Identify strengths** — What's working?
1144. **Identify gaps** — What's missing or weak?
1155. **Suggest improvements** — How to strengthen?
116
117### Output Format
118
119```markdown
120## Idea Audit: [Concept Name]
121
122**Score:** X/18 | **Verdict:** [Breakthrough/Promising/Incremental/Weak]
123
124### Dimension Scores
125| Dimension | Score | Assessment |
126|-----------|-------|------------|
127| Originality | /3 | [Finding] |
128| Feasibility | /3 | [Finding] |
129| Value | /3 | [Finding] |
130| Clarity | /3 | [Finding] |
131| Defensibility | /3 | [Finding] |
132| Scalability | /3 | [Finding] |
133
134### Strengths
135- [What's working]
136
137### Gaps
138- [What's missing]
139
140### Enhancement Recommendations
1411. [Specific improvement]
142```
143
144---
145
146## FIX Mode
147
148### Common Creative Blocks
149
150| Block | Symptom | Fix Technique |
151|-------|---------|---------------|
152| **Functional Fixedness** | Can only see obvious uses | Analogical transfer, SCAMPER |
153| **Einstellung Effect** | Stuck on first solution | Constraint removal, reverse brainstorm |
154| **Analysis Paralysis** | Overthinking, no output | Worst idea first, time pressure |
155| **Premature Judgment** | Killing ideas too early | Diverge/converge separation |
156| **Domain Blindness** | Only seeing industry norms | Random stimulation, cross-domain |
157| **Scope Creep** | Idea too complex | First principles, constraint addition |
158
159### Diagnostic Process
160
1611. **Identify block type** — What's preventing progress?
1622. **Select antidote technique** — Match technique to block
1633. **Apply technique** — Generate new options
1644. **Extract value** — What's useful in the output?
1655. **Iterate** — Refine or try another technique
166
167### Idea Strengthening Process
168
1691. **Isolate weakness** — What specifically is weak?
1702. **Diagnose cause** — Why is it weak?
1713. **Apply targeted fix** — Specific enhancement
1724. **Validate improvement** — Re-audit the idea
173
174### Output Format
175
176```markdown
177## Creative Fix: [Problem/Block]
178
179### Diagnosis
180- **Block type:** [Category]
181- **Symptom:** [What's happening]
182- **Root cause:** [Why it's happening]
183
184### Technique Applied: [Name]
185
186### Before
187[Original state/idea]
188
189### After
190[Improved state/ideas]
191
192### What Changed
193- [Specific improvement and why it helps]
194```
195
196Examples: [references/examples.md](references/examples.md)
197
198---
199
200## Technique Selection Guide
201
202| Problem Type | Best Techniques |
203|--------------|-----------------|
204| Need more ideas | SCAMPER, Random Stimulation, Worst Idea |
205| Stuck on one solution | Constraint Manipulation, Reverse Brainstorm |
206| Need breakthrough | First Principles, Analogical Transfer |
207| Too many ideas | Six Hats evaluation, Morphological narrowing |
208| Idea too vague | First Principles, Constraint Addition |
209| Idea too complex | Elimination, Core extraction |
210| Need team alignment | Six Thinking Hats, structured brainstorm |
211
212---
213
214## Failure Handling
215
216| Situation | Action |
217|-----------|--------|
218| Technique produces nothing useful | Switch technique; try opposite approach |
219| All ideas seem bad | Use "Worst Idea" to lower pressure; extract elements |
220| Can't escape existing solution | Add extreme constraint; remove core assumption |
221| Ideas too incremental | Ask "What would 10x require?"; analogize from distant domain |
222| Overwhelmed by options | Apply Six Hats structure; force ranking |
223| Time pressure | Use rapid SCAMPER (30 seconds per letter) |
224
225Anti-patterns: [references/anti-patterns.md](references/anti-patterns.md)
226
227---
228
229## Boundaries
230
231**In scope:**
232- Ideation and brainstorming
233- Problem reframing
234- Creative problem-solving
235- Concept development
236- Breaking mental blocks
237- Innovation methodologies
238
239**Out of scope:**
240- Implementation planning (use rsn-reasoning-problems.causal)
241- Market validation (use rsn-perceiving-information)
242- Visual/artistic design
243- Technical feasibility deep-dive
244
245---
246
247## References
248
249| File | Content |
250|------|---------|
251| [patterns.md](references/patterns.md) | Full technique catalog |
252| [audit-rubric.md](references/audit-rubric.md) | Detailed scoring criteria |
253| [anti-patterns.md](references/anti-patterns.md) | What to avoid |
254| [examples.md](references/examples.md) | Worked examples |