🏛️ Step 2: Architecture Assessment - Static Web Application
- ✅ Requirements Validation
- 💎 Executive Summary
- 🏛️ WAF Pillar Assessment
- 📦 Resource SKU Recommendations
- 🎯 Architecture Decision Summary
- 🚀 Implementation Handoff
- 🔒 Approval Gate
Generated by @architect agent | 2024-12-17
| ⬅️ Previous | 📑 Index | Next ➡️ |
|---|---|---|
| 01-requirements.md | README | 03-des-cost-estimate.md |
✅ Requirements Validation
| Category | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| NFRs | ✅ Defined | SLA: 99.9%, RTO: 4hrs, RPO: 1hr |
| Compliance | ✅ Defined | None (internal tool) |
| Cost Constraints | ✅ Defined | $50/month budget |
| Scale Requirements | ✅ Defined | 10 users, 1GB data |
All required information present - proceeding with assessment.
💎 Executive Summary
A lightweight static web application with Azure SQL backend for internal workflow validation. Architecture optimized for cost while maintaining acceptable reliability for non-critical workloads.
Recommended Architecture
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Azure Static Web Apps │
│ (Free Tier) │
│ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ │
│ │ Static │ │ Azure │ │ Azure │ │
│ │ Content │───▶│ Functions │───▶│ SQL DB │ │
│ │ (HTML/JS) │ │ (Integrated)│ │ (Basic S0) │ │
│ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Azure AD │
│ (Auth) │
└─────────────────┘
🏛️ WAF Pillar Assessment
Overall Scores
| Pillar | Score | Confidence | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔒 Security | 7/10 | High | Azure AD auth, HTTPS enforced, no public SQL |
| 🔄 Reliability | 6/10 | High | Single region, basic SLA, acceptable for workload |
| ⚡ Performance | 7/10 | High | Global CDN via SWA, adequate for 10 users |
| 💰 Cost Optimization | 9/10 | High | Free/Basic tiers, within $50 budget |
| 🔧 Operational Excellence | 7/10 | High | GitHub Actions CI/CD, Application Insights |
Primary Pillar Optimized: 💰 Cost Optimization
Trade-offs Accepted: Reduced reliability (no zone redundancy), limited scalability headroom
🔒 Security Assessment (7/10)
Strengths:
- Azure AD authentication (identity-first approach)
- HTTPS enforced by default on Static Web Apps
- SQL firewall restricts access to Azure services only
- No secrets in code (managed identity for SQL connection)
Gaps:
- No WAF (acceptable for internal tool)
- No private endpoints (cost prohibitive for budget)
- Basic threat protection only
Recommendations:
- Enable Azure AD authentication in SWA configuration
- Use managed identity for SQL connectivity
- Enable SQL auditing (included in Basic tier)
🔄 Reliability Assessment (6/10)
Strengths:
- Static Web Apps has built-in global distribution
- Azure SQL Basic includes automated backups (7-day retention)
- 99.9% SLA achievable with selected services
Gaps:
- No zone redundancy (not cost-effective for budget)
- Single region deployment
- No failover strategy
Recommendations:
- Implement connection retry logic in API code
- Configure backup retention to meet 1-hour RPO
- Document recovery procedures for 4-hour RTO
⚡ Performance Assessment (7/10)
Strengths:
- Static content served from global edge locations
- 5 DTU sufficient for projected 100 transactions/day
- Azure Functions cold start acceptable for internal tool
Gaps:
- SQL Basic tier has limited throughput
- No caching layer
Recommendations:
- Implement client-side caching for static assets
- Use efficient SQL queries with proper indexing
- Monitor DTU utilization via Azure Monitor
💰 Cost Assessment (9/10)
| Service | SKU | Monthly Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azure Static Web Apps | Free | $0.00 | ✅ MCP-verified |
| Azure SQL Database | S0 (10 DTU) | ~$15.00 | ✅ MCP-verified ($0.48/day × 30) |
| Azure Functions | Consumption (integrated) | ~$0.00 | Included with SWA Free |
| Application Insights | Basic | ~$0.10 | ✅ MCP-verified (first 5GB free) |
| Azure AD | Free tier | $0.00 | Standard directory features |
| Total Estimated | ~$15.10/mo | ✅ Under $50 budget |
Cost Optimization Applied:
- ✅ Free tier for Static Web Apps (vs Standard $9/mo)
- ✅ Basic/S0 SQL tier (vs General Purpose ~$100+/mo)
- ✅ Consumption-based Functions (vs Premium ~$120/mo)
- ✅ First 5GB Application Insights free
🔧 Operational Excellence Assessment (7/10)
Strengths:
- GitHub Actions CI/CD built into SWA
- Application Insights for monitoring
- Infrastructure as Code (Bicep)
Gaps:
- No advanced alerting configuration
- Manual scaling only
Recommendations:
- Configure basic alerts for SQL DTU > 80%
- Set up deployment slots for staging (if upgrading to Standard)
- Implement health check endpoint
📦 Resource SKU Recommendations
| Service | Recommended SKU | Configuration | Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azure Static Web Apps | Free | Default | Meets requirements, $0/mo |
| Azure SQL Database | Standard S0 | 10 DTU, 250GB max | Lowest cost, sufficient for workload |
| Azure Functions | Consumption | Integrated with SWA | No additional cost |
| Application Insights | Basic | 5GB included | Monitoring without cost |
| Log Analytics | Free tier | 5GB/month | Basic logging |
🎯 Architecture Decision Summary
| Decision | Choice | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting Platform | Azure Static Web Apps | Best fit for static + API, free tier available |
| Database | Azure SQL S0 | Cost-effective, managed, meets performance needs |
| Authentication | Azure AD | Enterprise identity, no additional cost |
| Monitoring | Application Insights | Integrated, consumption-based |
| Region | swedencentral | Default, sustainable operations |
🚀 Implementation Handoff
Ready for bicep-plan
The architecture is approved for implementation with the following key parameters:
region: swedencentral
environment: dev
budget: $50/month (estimated: $15.10)
resources:
- Azure Static Web Apps (Free)
- Azure SQL Database S0 (10 DTU)
- Application Insights (Basic)
- Log Analytics Workspace (Free tier)
security:
- Azure AD authentication
- Managed identity for SQL
- HTTPS enforced
monitoring:
- Application Insights
- SQL DTU alerts at 80%
🔒 Approval Gate
🏗️ Architecture Assessment Complete
Pillar Score Security 7/10 Reliability 6/10 Performance 7/10 Cost 9/10 Operations 7/10 Estimated Monthly Cost: ~$15.10 (✅ MCP-verified)
Confidence Level: High (all requirements defined)
Reply "approve" to proceed to bicep-plan, or provide feedback for revisions.
Assessment performed using Azure Well-Architected Framework. Pricing data from Azure Pricing MCP (2024-12-17).
Generated by Azure Agentic InfraOps | GitHub