System Prompts and Models of AI Tools
Research Date: 2026-02-23
Source URL: https://github.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
GitHub Repository: https://github.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
Version at Research: main branch (last pushed 2026-02-17)
License: GPL-3.0
Overview
This repository is the most comprehensive publicly available collection of leaked and reverse-engineered system prompts, internal tool definitions, and AI model configurations for major commercial AI coding assistants and productivity tools. Maintained by x1xhlol (NotLucknite), it covers 30,000+ lines of system prompt content spanning tools such as Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Devin AI, Copilot, Replit, Lovable, Manus, Perplexity, v0, and many others. The repository serves as a primary reference for understanding how production AI systems structure their instructions, tool schemas, and behavioral constraints.
Problem Addressed
| Problem |
Solution |
| System prompts for major AI tools are proprietary and undocumented |
Aggregates leaked and reverse-engineered prompts across 30+ AI tools in one repository |
| Prompt engineers and researchers have no reference for how production AI systems are structured |
Provides full verbatim system prompts with internal tool definitions and model configuration details |
| Understanding competitor or peer AI tool architectures requires expensive reverse engineering |
Community-maintained collection removes individual reverse-engineering burden |
| No canonical source exists for tracking how AI tool prompts evolve over time |
Repository is actively updated with new tools and prompt revisions (latest update: 2026-02-17) |
| Developing high-quality AI coding agents requires understanding existing design patterns |
Real-world prompt examples from production systems expose best-practice patterns for tool use, safety rails, and task decomposition |
Key Statistics
| Metric |
Value |
Date Gathered |
| GitHub Stars |
117,922 |
2026-02-23 |
| Forks |
30,596 |
2026-02-23 |
| Watchers |
1,500 |
2026-02-23 |
| Open Issues |
120 |
2026-02-23 |
| Lines of Content |
30,000+ |
2026-02-23 |
| Tools Covered |
30+ |
2026-02-23 |
| Repository Created |
2025-03-05 |
2026-02-23 |
| Last Updated |
2026-02-17 |
2026-02-23 |
Key Features
Tool Coverage
Includes system prompts and/or model configurations for: Augment Code, Claude Code, Cluely, CodeBuddy, Comet, Cursor, Devin AI, Junie, Kiro, Leap.new, Lovable, Manus, NotionAI, Orchids.app, Perplexity, Poke, Qoder, Replit, Same.dev, Trae, Traycer AI, VSCode Agent, Warp.dev, Windsurf, Xcode, Z.ai Code, Dia, v0, and other open-sourced tools.
Content Types
- System prompts: Full verbatim base instructions given to each AI model
- Internal tool definitions: JSON/function-call schemas for tools available to each AI agent
- Model configurations: Model selection, temperature, and context window settings where disclosed
- Behavioral guidelines: Safety constraints, refusal patterns, and task decomposition strategies
Research Accessibility
- Organized in a flat directory structure by tool name
- Plain-text and Markdown format for easy reading and diffing
- Community discussions via GitHub Issues for context and corrections
- DeepWiki integration for AI-powered search across the entire collection
Technical Architecture
Repository Structure
system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools/
{tool-name}/ # One directory per AI tool
system-prompt.md # Full system prompt content
tools.md # Internal tool definitions (if available)
model-info.md # Model configuration details (if available)
README.md # Index with tool list and support information
Content Sourcing
Content is gathered through:
- Prompt injection / extraction: Techniques that cause models to reveal their system instructions
- API inspection: Intercepting network traffic between AI tool frontends and their backends
- Community contributions: Submissions from researchers and developers who discover prompt content
- Open-sourced disclosures: Some tools (e.g., Cursor, GitHub Copilot) have partially disclosed prompt content
Relevance to Claude Code Development
Applications
- Claude Code system prompt analysis: The repository includes Claude Code's system prompt, providing direct insight into how Anthropic structures Claude's coding agent instructions — valuable for understanding what behaviors are built-in vs. what can be customized
- Skill and agent design benchmarking: Compare Claude Code skill/agent designs against how Cursor, Windsurf, and Devin AI structure their agent instructions to identify gaps and patterns worth adopting
- Tool schema reference: The internal tool definitions (JSON function schemas) from production agents like Devin AI and Manus provide real-world examples of tool design for complex coding workflows
- Safety and refusal pattern research: Examining safety constraints across multiple AI systems helps design more robust behavioral guardrails for custom Claude Code agents
Patterns Worth Adopting
- Explicit tool use protocols: Most production system prompts include explicit instructions for when and how to use each tool, including ordering preferences and fallback behaviors — a pattern that could strengthen Claude Code skill SKILL.md files
- Structured task decomposition: Systems like Devin AI and Manus use layered decomposition instructions (high-level goal → sub-tasks → individual tool calls) that could inform multi-agent orchestration patterns
- Verbosity and format controls: Production prompts carefully specify output format, verbosity levels, and when to ask for clarification vs. proceeding autonomously — directly applicable to Claude Code agent design
Integration Opportunities
- Prompt pattern library: Extract and catalog recurring patterns from across the collection (e.g., "how 10 coding agents handle file editing") to inform Claude Code skill content
- Competitive gap analysis: Systematically compare Claude Code's available capabilities against those documented for Cursor, Windsurf, and Devin AI to identify missing skill/agent coverage
- Safety pattern adoption: Use documented safety and boundary patterns from multiple production systems to improve Claude Code agent behavioral constraints
References
Freshness Tracking
| Field |
Value |
| Last Verified |
2026-02-23 |
| Version at Verification |
main (2026-02-17 push) |
| Next Review Recommended |
2026-05-23 |
1---2name: system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools3description: This repository is the most comprehensive publicly available collection of leaked and reverse-engineered system prompts, internal tool definitions, and AI model configurations for major commercial AI coding assistants…4---5# System Prompts and Models of AI Tools67**Research Date**: 2026-02-238**Source URL**: <https://github.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools>9**GitHub Repository**: <https://github.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools>10**Version at Research**: main branch (last pushed 2026-02-17)11**License**: GPL-3.01213---1415## Overview1617This repository is the most comprehensive publicly available collection of leaked and reverse-engineered system prompts, internal tool definitions, and AI model configurations for major commercial AI coding assistants and productivity tools. Maintained by x1xhlol (NotLucknite), it covers 30,000+ lines of system prompt content spanning tools such as Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Devin AI, Copilot, Replit, Lovable, Manus, Perplexity, v0, and many others. The repository serves as a primary reference for understanding how production AI systems structure their instructions, tool schemas, and behavioral constraints.1819---2021## Problem Addressed2223| Problem | Solution |24|---------|----------|25| System prompts for major AI tools are proprietary and undocumented | Aggregates leaked and reverse-engineered prompts across 30+ AI tools in one repository |26| Prompt engineers and researchers have no reference for how production AI systems are structured | Provides full verbatim system prompts with internal tool definitions and model configuration details |27| Understanding competitor or peer AI tool architectures requires expensive reverse engineering | Community-maintained collection removes individual reverse-engineering burden |28| No canonical source exists for tracking how AI tool prompts evolve over time | Repository is actively updated with new tools and prompt revisions (latest update: 2026-02-17) |29| Developing high-quality AI coding agents requires understanding existing design patterns | Real-world prompt examples from production systems expose best-practice patterns for tool use, safety rails, and task decomposition |3031---3233## Key Statistics3435| Metric | Value | Date Gathered |36|--------|-------|---------------|37| GitHub Stars | 117,922 | 2026-02-23 |38| Forks | 30,596 | 2026-02-23 |39| Watchers | 1,500 | 2026-02-23 |40| Open Issues | 120 | 2026-02-23 |41| Lines of Content | 30,000+ | 2026-02-23 |42| Tools Covered | 30+ | 2026-02-23 |43| Repository Created | 2025-03-05 | 2026-02-23 |44| Last Updated | 2026-02-17 | 2026-02-23 |4546---4748## Key Features4950### Tool Coverage5152Includes system prompts and/or model configurations for: Augment Code, Claude Code, Cluely, CodeBuddy, Comet, Cursor, Devin AI, Junie, Kiro, Leap.new, Lovable, Manus, NotionAI, Orchids.app, Perplexity, Poke, Qoder, Replit, Same.dev, Trae, Traycer AI, VSCode Agent, Warp.dev, Windsurf, Xcode, Z.ai Code, Dia, v0, and other open-sourced tools.5354### Content Types5556- **System prompts**: Full verbatim base instructions given to each AI model57- **Internal tool definitions**: JSON/function-call schemas for tools available to each AI agent58- **Model configurations**: Model selection, temperature, and context window settings where disclosed59- **Behavioral guidelines**: Safety constraints, refusal patterns, and task decomposition strategies6061### Research Accessibility6263- Organized in a flat directory structure by tool name64- Plain-text and Markdown format for easy reading and diffing65- Community discussions via GitHub Issues for context and corrections66- DeepWiki integration for AI-powered search across the entire collection6768---6970## Technical Architecture7172### Repository Structure7374```text75system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools/76 {tool-name}/ # One directory per AI tool77 system-prompt.md # Full system prompt content78 tools.md # Internal tool definitions (if available)79 model-info.md # Model configuration details (if available)80 README.md # Index with tool list and support information81```8283### Content Sourcing8485Content is gathered through:86871. **Prompt injection / extraction**: Techniques that cause models to reveal their system instructions882. **API inspection**: Intercepting network traffic between AI tool frontends and their backends893. **Community contributions**: Submissions from researchers and developers who discover prompt content904. **Open-sourced disclosures**: Some tools (e.g., Cursor, GitHub Copilot) have partially disclosed prompt content9192---9394## Relevance to Claude Code Development9596### Applications9798- **Claude Code system prompt analysis**: The repository includes Claude Code's system prompt, providing direct insight into how Anthropic structures Claude's coding agent instructions — valuable for understanding what behaviors are built-in vs. what can be customized99- **Skill and agent design benchmarking**: Compare Claude Code skill/agent designs against how Cursor, Windsurf, and Devin AI structure their agent instructions to identify gaps and patterns worth adopting100- **Tool schema reference**: The internal tool definitions (JSON function schemas) from production agents like Devin AI and Manus provide real-world examples of tool design for complex coding workflows101- **Safety and refusal pattern research**: Examining safety constraints across multiple AI systems helps design more robust behavioral guardrails for custom Claude Code agents102103### Patterns Worth Adopting104105- **Explicit tool use protocols**: Most production system prompts include explicit instructions for when and how to use each tool, including ordering preferences and fallback behaviors — a pattern that could strengthen Claude Code skill SKILL.md files106- **Structured task decomposition**: Systems like Devin AI and Manus use layered decomposition instructions (high-level goal → sub-tasks → individual tool calls) that could inform multi-agent orchestration patterns107- **Verbosity and format controls**: Production prompts carefully specify output format, verbosity levels, and when to ask for clarification vs. proceeding autonomously — directly applicable to Claude Code agent design108109### Integration Opportunities110111- **Prompt pattern library**: Extract and catalog recurring patterns from across the collection (e.g., "how 10 coding agents handle file editing") to inform Claude Code skill content112- **Competitive gap analysis**: Systematically compare Claude Code's available capabilities against those documented for Cursor, Windsurf, and Devin AI to identify missing skill/agent coverage113- **Safety pattern adoption**: Use documented safety and boundary patterns from multiple production systems to improve Claude Code agent behavioral constraints114115---116117## References118119- [system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools GitHub Repository](https://github.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools) (accessed 2026-02-23)120- [Trendshift — Repository Ranking](https://trendshift.io/repositories/14084) (accessed 2026-02-23)121- [DeepWiki — AI-powered search of the collection](https://deepwiki.com/x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools) (accessed 2026-02-23)122- [ZeroLeaks — Related AI security audit service referenced in README](https://zeroleaks.ai/) (accessed 2026-02-23)123124---125126## Freshness Tracking127128| Field | Value |129|-------|-------|130| Last Verified | 2026-02-23 |131| Version at Verification | main (2026-02-17 push) |132| Next Review Recommended | 2026-05-23 |