Arckit Story

You are helping an enterprise architect generate a comprehensive project story that documents the journey of an ArcKit-managed project from inception to completion, with heavy emphasis on timeline analysis and governance achievements.

This command creates a ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STORY-v1.0.md document that serves as:

• A historical record of the project's evolution through the ArcKit governance framework
• A detailed timeline analysis with multiple visualization types (Gantt, flowchart, table, pie chart)
• A demonstration of end-to-end traceability from stakeholder needs to delivery plans
• A showcase of governance quality and compliance achievements

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

Instructions

Note: Before generating, scan projects/ for existing project directories. For each project, list all ARC-*.md artifacts, check external/ for reference documents, and check 000-global/ for cross-project policies. If no external docs exist but they would improve output, ask the user.

Step 0: Read existing artifacts from the project context

MANDATORY (warn if missing):

• PRIN (Architecture Principles, in projects/000-global/)
  • Extract: Governance standards, technology constraints, compliance framework
  • If missing: warn user to run $arckit-principles first — principles are the foundation of the ArcKit governance framework

RECOMMENDED (read if available, note if missing):

• STKE (Stakeholder Analysis) — personas, goals, priorities
• RISK (Risk Register) — risks, mitigations, risk appetite
• SOBC (Business Case) — benefits, costs, ROI
• REQ (Requirements) — BR/FR/NFR/INT/DR traceability
• DATA (Data Model) — entities, relationships, governance
• DIAG (Architecture Diagrams) — C4, deployment, data flow
• RSCH / AWSR / AZUR — technology research
• WARD (Wardley Map) — strategic positioning
• PLAN (Project Plan) — timeline, phases, gates
• SOW / DOS — procurement documents
• EVAL (Evaluation Criteria) — vendor evaluation
• HLDR / DLDR (Design Reviews)
• TCOP (TCoP Assessment)
• SECD / MSBD — security assessments
• DPIA (DPIA)
• AIPB (AI Playbook)
• ATRS (ATRS record)
• BKLG (Product Backlog)
• DEVOPS (DevOps Strategy)
• TRAC (Traceability Matrix)
• ROAD (Roadmap)
• ANAL (Governance Analysis)

Minimum artifact check: A meaningful project story requires at least 3-5 artifacts. If the project has fewer than 3, warn:

⚠️  Warning: This project only has [N] artifacts.

A comprehensive story typically requires at least:
- Architecture principles (global)
- Stakeholder analysis
- Requirements or Risk Register

Consider running more ArcKit commands before generating the story, or proceed
with a limited story based on available artifacts.

Step 0b: Read external documents and policies

• Read any external documents listed in the project context (external/ files) — extract project history, key milestones, lessons learned, user research insights, governance decisions
• Read any enterprise standards in projects/000-global/external/ — extract enterprise reporting templates, programme dashboards, cross-project narrative standards
• If no external docs exist but they would enrich the project story, ask: "Do you have any project reports, user research findings, or governance decision records? I can read PDFs directly. Place them in projects/{project-dir}/external/ and re-run, or skip."
• Citation traceability: When referencing content from external documents, follow the citation instructions in .arckit/references/citation-instructions.md. Place inline citation markers (e.g., [PP-C1]) next to findings informed by source documents and populate the "External References" section in the template.

Step 1: Identify the target project

• Use the ArcKit Project Context (above) to find the project matching the user's input (by name or number)
• If no match, create a new project:
  1. Use Glob to list projects/*/ directories and find the highest NNN-* number (or start at 001 if none exist)
  2. Calculate the next number (zero-padded to 3 digits, e.g., 002)
  3. Slugify the project name (lowercase, replace non-alphanumeric with hyphens, trim)
  4. Use the Write tool to create projects/{NNN}-{slug}/README.md with the project name, ID, and date — the Write tool will create all parent directories automatically
  5. Also create projects/{NNN}-{slug}/external/README.md with a note to place external reference documents here
  6. Set PROJECT_ID = the 3-digit number, PROJECT_PATH = the new directory path

Step 2: Comprehensive Project Artifact Scan

Scan the project directory to find ALL artifacts:

# Find all .md files in the project directory
find "$PROJECT_DIR" -type f -name "*.md" | sort

Expected Artifacts (categorize by type):

Foundation Artifacts:

• ARC-*-STKE-*.md - Stakeholder analysis
• ARC-000-PRIN-*.md in projects/000-global/ - Architecture principles (global)
• ARC-*-RISK-*.md - Risk assessment

Business Case Artifacts:

• ARC-*-SOBC-*.md - Strategic Outline Business Case
• ARC-*-DATA-*.md - Data model and ERD

Requirements Artifacts:

• ARC-*-REQ-*.md - BR/FR/NFR/INT/DR requirements

Strategic Planning Artifacts:

• ARC-*-RSCH-*.md - Technology research and build vs buy
• wardley-maps/ARC-*-WARD-*.md - Wardley maps
• diagrams/ARC-*-DIAG-*.md - C4 and deployment diagrams
• ARC-*-PLAN-*.md - Project plan with timeline

Procurement Artifacts:

• ARC-*-SOW-*.md - Statement of Work
• ARC-*-DOS-*.md - Digital Outcomes and Specialists
• ARC-*-EVAL-*.md - Vendor evaluation framework
• vendors/*/scoring.md - Vendor scoring sheets

Design Review Artifacts:

• vendors/*/reviews/ARC-*-HLDR-*.md - High-Level Design reviews
• vendors/*/reviews/ARC-*-DLDR-*.md - Detailed Design reviews

Delivery Artifacts:

• ARC-*-BKLG-*.md - Product backlog with user stories
• ARC-*-SNOW-*.md - ServiceNow CMDB and SLA design

Compliance Artifacts:

• ARC-*-TCOP-*.md - Technology Code of Practice
• ARC-*-SVCASS-*.md - GDS Service Assessment
• ARC-*-SECD-*.md - Security assessment
• ARC-*-SECD-MOD-*.md - MOD security (if defence)
• ARC-*-AIPB-*.md - AI Playbook (if AI system)
• ARC-*-ATRS-*.md - ATRS (if algorithmic)
• ARC-*-JSP936-*.md - MOD AI assurance (if MOD AI)

Governance Artifacts:

• ARC-*-TRAC-*.md - End-to-end traceability
• ARC-*-ANAL-*.md - Governance quality analysis

For each artifact found, note:

• File path
• File name (maps to ArcKit command used)
• Date created (from file modification time or git log)
• Size (as proxy for completeness)

Step 3: Extract Comprehensive Timeline

Preferred Method: Git Log Analysis

If the project is under git version control, extract the timeline from git history:

cd "$PROJECT_DIR"

# Get detailed git log with timestamps for all project files
git log --follow --format="%ai | %s" --name-only -- . | grep -E "(\.md|^[0-9]{4})"

This will show:

• Timestamps (YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS)
• Commit messages (which often contain ArcKit command names like "$arckit-requirements")
• Files changed

Parse this data to create timeline events:

• Event date/time
• Command used (extract from commit message)
• Artifact created/modified
• Days from project start

Fallback Method: File Modification Dates

If git log is not available or sparse, use file modification times:

# Get file modification times
stat -c "%y %n" "$PROJECT_DIR"/*.md | sort
stat -c "%y %n" "$PROJECT_DIR"/vendors/*/*.md | sort
stat -c "%y %n" "$PROJECT_DIR"/diagrams/ARC-*-DIAG-*.md | sort
stat -c "%y %n" "$PROJECT_DIR"/wardley-maps/ARC-*-WARD-*.md | sort

Extract Timeline Metrics:

• Project start date: Earliest file/commit date
• Project end date: Latest file/commit date (or "Ongoing")
• Total duration: Days between start and end
• Total artifacts: Count of all .md files found
• Commands executed: Count of unique artifacts (proxy for commands)
• Phase durations: Calculate time spent in each phase based on artifact types
• Velocity: Artifacts per week, commands per week
• Longest phase: Which phase took most time and why
• Shortest phase: Which phase was fastest and why

Timeline Data Structure:

Create an internal data structure like:

Timeline Events:
[
  {
    date: "2024-01-15",
    days_from_start: 0,
    event_type: "Foundation",
    command: "$arckit-principles",
    artifact: "ARC-000-PRIN-v1.0.md",
    description: "Established enterprise architecture principles"
  },
  {
    date: "2024-01-18",
    days_from_start: 3,
    event_type: "Foundation",
    command: "$arckit-stakeholders",
    artifact: "ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STKE-v1.0.md",
    description: "Analyzed 8 stakeholders, 12 goals, 15 outcomes"
  },
  ...
]

Step 4: Analyze Each Artifact

For each artifact found, read the file and extract key information:

Stakeholder Analysis (ARC-*-STKE-*.md):

• Count: Number of stakeholders, goals, outcomes
• Key stakeholders: List names/roles
• Primary goals: Extract top 3-5 goals
• Measurable outcomes: Extract metrics

Risk Register (ARC-*-RISK-*.md):

• Total risks: Count
• Risk breakdown: High/medium/low counts
• Top risks: Extract top 3-5 risks with scores
• Mitigation status: How many risks have mitigation plans

SOBC (ARC-*-SOBC-*.md):

• NPV: Net Present Value
• ROI: Return on Investment
• BCR: Benefit-Cost Ratio
• Strategic alignment: Key strategic objectives
• Procurement route: G-Cloud/DOS/Traditional

Requirements (ARC-*-REQ-*.md):

• BR count: Count of BR-xxx requirements
• FR count: Count of FR-xxx requirements
• NFR count: Count of NFR-xxx requirements (breakdown by NFR-P, NFR-SEC, NFR-S, NFR-A, NFR-C)
• INT count: Count of INT-xxx integrations
• DR count: Count of DR-xxx data requirements
• Priority breakdown: Must/Should/Could/Won't counts
• Key requirements: Extract top priority requirements

Data Model (ARC-*-DATA-*.md):

• Entity count: Number of entities defined
• Relationship count: Number of relationships
• GDPR compliance: Lawful basis, data subject rights
• Key entities: List primary entities

Research Findings (ARC-*-RSCH-*.md):

• Options evaluated: Count and list
• Build vs Buy decision: BUILD/BUY/HYBRID
• Rationale: Why decision was made
• Recommended vendor: If buy option chosen

wardley-maps/ARC--WARD-.md:

• Map count: How many maps created
• Map types: Current state, future state, gap analysis, vendor comparison, etc.
• Evolution insights: Key components and their evolution stages
• Strategic recommendations: Build vs buy alignment

diagrams/ARC--DIAG-.md:

• Diagram types: C4 context/container/component, deployment, sequence
• Component count: Number of system components
• Technology stack: Technologies identified in diagrams
• Integration points: External systems

ARC--SOW-.md:

• Procurement route: G-Cloud/DOS/Traditional
• Requirement count: How many requirements in SOW
• Deliverables: Key deliverables listed
• Commercial terms: Payment structure, KPIs

ARC--EVAL-.md & vendors/*/scoring.md:

• Vendors evaluated: Count
• Evaluation criteria: Technical/commercial/social value weights
• Winner: Vendor name and score
• Score breakdown: Individual vendor scores

vendors//reviews/ARC--HLDR-*.md:

• Verdict: APPROVED/APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS/REJECTED
• Principles compliance: Percentage
• Requirements coverage: Percentage
• Strengths: Count of strengths
• Concerns: Count of concerns
• Gaps: Count of gaps

vendors//reviews/ARC--DLDR-*.md:

• Verdict: APPROVED/APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS/REJECTED
• Implementation readiness: Assessment
• Security controls: Status
• Performance optimizations: Status

ARC--BKLG-.md:

• User story count: Total stories
• Sprint count: Number of sprints
• Sprint length: Weeks per sprint
• Estimated duration: Total weeks/months
• Story breakdown: Must/Should/Could/Won't

ARC--SNOW-.md:

• CMDB CIs: Count of configuration items
• SLA count: Number of SLAs defined
• SLA targets: P1/P2/P3/P4 response and resolution times
• Integration: ServiceNow integration approach

Compliance artifacts (ARC--TCOP-.md, ARC--SVCASS-.md, ARC--SECD-.md, etc.):

• Compliance score: X/Y points
• Compliance percentage: Score as percentage
• Status: PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL or READY/NOT READY
• Key findings: List main findings
• Framework name: TCoP, GDS Service Standard, NCSC CAF, etc.

Traceability Matrix (ARC-*-TRAC-*.md):

• Traceability coverage: Percentage
• Traceability counts: How many links in each traceability chain
• Gaps: Any gaps in traceability

ARC--ANAL-.md:

• Artifacts analyzed: Count
• Completeness: Percentage
• Quality score: Overall governance quality
• Recommendations: Key recommendations

Step 5: Build Traceability Chains

Using the data extracted from artifacts, map the traceability chains:

Chain 1: Stakeholder → Requirements

• Stakeholder Goals → Business Requirements (BR-xxx)
• Count: How many goals mapped to how many BRs

Chain 2: Requirements → Design

• Business Requirements → Functional Requirements
• Functional Requirements → Architecture Components (from diagrams)
• Non-Functional Requirements → NFR specifications

Chain 3: Requirements → Vendor

• Requirements → SOW Requirements
• SOW Requirements → Evaluation Criteria
• Evaluation Criteria → Vendor Selection

Chain 4: Requirements → Delivery

• Functional Requirements → User Stories
• User Stories → Sprint Backlog

Chain 5: Data Flow

• Data Model Entities → Data Requirements (DR-xxx)
• Data Requirements → CMDB Configuration Items

Chain 6: Compliance Flow

• Requirements → Compliance Assessments
• Architecture Principles → Design Reviews
• Risk Register → Security Assessments

Step 5b: Load Mermaid Syntax References

Read .arckit/skills/mermaid-syntax/references/gantt.md, .arckit/skills/mermaid-syntax/references/flowchart.md, .arckit/skills/mermaid-syntax/references/pie.md, .arckit/skills/mermaid-syntax/references/timeline.md, and .arckit/skills/mermaid-syntax/references/mindmap.md for official Mermaid syntax — date formats, task statuses, node shapes, edge labels, pie chart syntax, timeline formatting, mindmap indentation, and styling options.

Step 6: Generate Timeline Visualizations

Create 4 types of timeline visualizations using the timeline data extracted:

Visualization 1: Gantt Chart

Use Mermaid gantt syntax to create a visual timeline by phase:

gantt
    title [PROJECT_NAME] Project Timeline
    dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD

    section Foundation
    Architecture Principles         :done, principles, [START_DATE], [DURATION]
    Stakeholder Analysis           :done, stakeholders, after principles, [DURATION]
    Risk Assessment                :done, risk, after stakeholders, [DURATION]

    section Business Case
    Strategic Outline Business Case :done, sobc, [DATE], [DURATION]
    Data Model                     :done, data, after sobc, [DURATION]

    section Requirements
    Requirements Definition        :done, req, [DATE], [DURATION]
    Wardley Mapping               :done, wardley, after req, [DURATION]
    Technology Research           :done, research, after req, [DURATION]

    section Procurement
    Statement of Work             :done, sow, [DATE], [DURATION]
    Vendor Evaluation            :done, eval, after sow, [DURATION]

    section Design
    Architecture Diagrams        :done, diagrams, [DATE], [DURATION]
    High-Level Design Review     :done, hld, after diagrams, [DURATION]
    Detailed Design Review       :done, dld, after hld, [DURATION]

    section Delivery
    Product Backlog             :done, backlog, [DATE], [DURATION]
    ServiceNow Design           :done, snow, after backlog, [DURATION]

    section Compliance
    Service Assessment          :done, assessment, [DATE], [DURATION]
    Secure by Design           :done, secure, after assessment, [DURATION]

    section Governance
    Traceability Matrix        :done, trace, [DATE], [DURATION]
    Quality Analysis           :done, analyze, after trace, [DURATION]

Important: Use actual dates from timeline data. Calculate durations between events. Only include phases/commands that actually exist in the project.

Visualization 2: Linear Command Flow Timeline

Use Mermaid flowchart with dates on each command node:

flowchart TD
    Start([Project Initiated<br/>[START_DATE]]) --> Principles

    Principles["arckit.principles<br/>[DATE]<br/>Architecture Principles"] --> Stakeholders
    Stakeholders["arckit.stakeholders<br/>[DATE]<br/>Stakeholder Analysis"] --> Risk
    Risk["arckit.risk<br/>[DATE]<br/>Risk Register"] --> SOBC

    [... continue for all commands actually executed ...]

    Trace["arckit.traceability<br/>[DATE]<br/>Traceability Matrix"] --> Analyze
    Analyze["arckit.analyze<br/>[DATE]<br/>Quality Analysis"] --> End

    End([Project Complete<br/>[END_DATE]])

    style Start fill:#e1f5e1
    style End fill:#e1f5e1

Visualization 3: Timeline Table

Create a detailed table with all events:

Visualization 4: Phase Duration Pie Chart

Calculate percentage of time spent in each phase:

pie title Project Phase Time Distribution
    "Foundation (Principles, Stakeholders, Risk)" : [PERCENTAGE]
    "Business Case & Requirements" : [PERCENTAGE]
    "Research & Strategic Planning" : [PERCENTAGE]
    "Procurement & Vendor Selection" : [PERCENTAGE]
    "Design & Review" : [PERCENTAGE]
    "Delivery Planning" : [PERCENTAGE]
    "Compliance & Security" : [PERCENTAGE]
    "Governance & Traceability" : [PERCENTAGE]

Step 7: Generate Additional Mermaid Diagrams

Timeline Milestone Chart:

timeline
    title [PROJECT_NAME] Key Milestones
    [START_DATE] : Project Initiated
                  : Architecture Principles Established
    [DATE] : Stakeholder Analysis Complete
           : [N] Stakeholders, [M] Goals
    [DATE] : Business Case Approved
           : SOBC (5-case model)
    [... key milestones with dates ...]
    [END_DATE] : Project Governance Complete
              : Traceability Matrix Verified

Traceability Chain Flowchart:

flowchart TD
    subgraph Foundation
        Principles[Architecture<br/>Principles<br/>[N] principles]
        Stakeholders[Stakeholder<br/>Analysis<br/>[M] stakeholders]
        Risk[Risk<br/>Register<br/>[Q] risks]
    end

    subgraph Requirements
        BR[Business<br/>Requirements<br/>[BR_COUNT] BR]
        FR[Functional<br/>Requirements<br/>[FR_COUNT] FR]
        NFR[Non-Functional<br/>Requirements<br/>[NFR_COUNT] NFR]
    end

    [... show full traceability flow ...]

    style Principles fill:#fff4e6
    style Requirements fill:#e1f5e1

Governance Achievements Mind Map:

mindmap
  root((Project<br/>Achievements))
    Foundation
      Architecture Principles Established
      [N] Stakeholders Engaged
      [M] Risks Managed
    Business Case
      SOBC Approved
      [NPV] NPV
      Data Model GDPR Compliant
    [... continue for all phases ...]

Step 8: Write Design & Delivery Review Chapters

For the 2 key chapters in the template, write a comprehensive narrative using the data extracted:

Chapter 6: Design Review - Validating the Solution

• Timeline context: Dates, duration, percentage of project timeline
• What happened: Vendor designs underwent rigorous ArcKit governance reviews
• Key activities:
  • High-Level Design Review (HLD): Assessment against principles, requirements, NFRs, risks
  • Detailed Design Review (DLD): API specs, database schemas, security controls, performance
• Findings: Strengths, concerns, gaps for both HLD and DLD
• Verdict: APPROVED/APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS/REJECTED for each review
• Decision Points: HLD review decision, DLD review decision
• Traceability Chain: Principles → HLD, Requirements → HLD/DLD, Risk → DLD
• Artifacts created: ARC--HLDR-.md, ARC--DLDR-.md

Chapter 7: Delivery Planning - From Requirements to Sprints

• Timeline context: Dates, duration, percentage of project
• What happened: Translating approved designs into delivery plans
• Key activities:
  • Product Backlog: Requirements → GDS user stories, MoSCoW prioritization, sprint planning
  • ServiceNow Design: CMDB CIs, SLA definitions, incident/change management workflows
• Backlog Summary: Story count, sprint count, velocity assumptions
• Traceability Chain: Requirements → User Stories → Sprint Backlog, Components → CMDB CIs
• Artifacts created: ARC--BKLG-.md, ARC--SNOW-.md

Step 9: Calculate Timeline Metrics

Create a comprehensive metrics table:

Step 10: Write Timeline Insights & Analysis

Write comprehensive analysis sections:

Pacing Analysis:

• Overall pacing assessment: Steady/Accelerated/Extended
• Phase-by-phase analysis
• Comparison to typical ArcKit projects

Critical Path:

• Identify the critical path through the project
• Show longest dependency chains
• Identify parallel workstreams that could have been done concurrently

Timeline Deviations:

• Expected vs actual durations (if project plan exists)
• Reasons for deviations
• Impact assessment

Velocity Metrics:

• Commands per week over time
• Peak velocity periods
• Slowest periods and reasons

Lessons Learned:

• What went well (timeline perspective)
• What could be improved
• Recommendations for future projects

Step 11: Detect Version

Before generating the document ID, check if a previous version exists:

1. Look for existing ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STORY-v*.md files in the project directory
2. If no existing file: Use VERSION="1.0"
3. If existing file found:
   • Read the existing document to understand its scope
   • Compare against current project artifacts and timeline
   • Minor increment (e.g., 1.0 → 1.1): Scope unchanged — refreshed metrics, updated timeline, corrected details
   • Major increment (e.g., 1.0 → 2.0): Scope materially changed — new project phases covered, fundamentally different achievements, significant new artifacts added
4. Use the determined version for document ID, filename, Document Control, and Revision History
5. For v1.1+/v2.0+: Add a Revision History entry describing what changed from the previous version

Step 12: Construct Document Control Metadata

Construct document control fields:

• Document ID: ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STORY-v{VERSION} (e.g., ARC-001-STORY-v1.0)
• Date Created: Current date in YYYY-MM-DD format

Document control fields:

• {document_id}: Generated doc ID (e.g., ARC-001-STORY-v1.0)
• {version}: v${VERSION}
• {status}: Final
• {date_created}: Today's date
• {last_updated}: Today's date
• {project_id}: From project directory name (e.g., 001)

Step 13: Read Template and Populate

Read the story template:

Read the template (with user override support):

• First, check if .arckit/templates-custom/story-template.md exists in the project root
• If found: Read the user's customized template (user override takes precedence)
• If not found: Read .arckit/templates/story-template.md (default)
• Then read .arckit/templates/_partials/RENDERING.md and resolve the <!-- DOC-CONTROL-HEADER --> marker in the template before writing. Do not hand-write the Document Control table: the partial RENDERING.md selects is the only source of the 14 standard fields and of the classification ladder.

Tip: Users can customize templates with $arckit-customize story

Populate ALL placeholders in the template with real data:

Square bracket placeholders (manual placeholders in template):

• [PROJECT_NAME] → Actual project name
• [START_DATE] → Earliest date from timeline
• [END_DATE] → Latest date from timeline
• [TOTAL_DAYS] → Calculated duration
• [TOTAL_WEEKS] → Calculated duration in weeks
• [ARTIFACT_COUNT] → Count of artifacts found
• [COMMAND_COUNT] → Count of commands executed
• [N], [M], [P], [Q] → Actual counts from artifact analysis
• [BR_COUNT], [FR_COUNT], [NFR_COUNT], etc. → Actual requirement counts
• [DATE] → Actual dates from timeline
• [DAYS] → Actual day counts
• [PERCENTAGE] → Actual calculated percentages
• [VENDOR_NAME] → Actual vendor name if selected
• [BUILD/BUY] → Actual decision
• All other placeholders → Replace with actual data

Curly brace placeholders (document control):

• {document_id} → Generated document ID
• {version} → v1.0
• {status} → Final
• {date_created} → Today's date
• {last_updated} → Today's date
• {project_id} → Project ID

CRITICAL:

• Replace EVERY placeholder with real data
• If data is not available, use "Not available" or "N/A"
• Ensure all Mermaid diagrams have real dates and data
• Ensure all tables are complete with real counts
• Write full narrative paragraphs for each chapter with real project details

Before writing the file, read .arckit/references/quality-checklist.md and verify all Common Checks plus the STORY per-type checks pass. Fix any failures before proceeding.

Step 14: Write ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STORY-v${VERSION}.md Using Write Tool

CRITICAL: Use the Write tool to create the document. Do NOT output the full content in your response.

Write tool:
- file_path: projects/[PROJECT_ID]-[PROJECT_NAME]/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STORY-v1.0.md
- content: [Full populated template with all placeholders replaced]

The document will be 2000-3000 lines with:

• Complete document control
• Executive summary with metrics
• 4 timeline visualizations
• Timeline metrics table
• Milestone timeline
• 2 detailed narrative chapters (Design Review & Delivery Planning)
• Timeline insights & analysis
• Complete traceability chain with Mermaid diagrams
• Key outcomes & achievements
• 5 comprehensive appendices

Step 15: Show Concise Summary to User

After writing the file, show the user a concise summary (NOT the full document):

✅ Project story generated: projects/001-cabinet-office-genai/ARC-001-STORY-v1.0.md

📊 **Project Timeline Summary**
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

**Project**: Cabinet Office GenAI Chatbot Platform
**Duration**: 79 days (11 weeks) from 2024-01-15 to 2024-04-03
**Artifacts Created**: 23 artifacts
**Commands Executed**: 22 ArcKit commands
**Velocity**: 2.0 commands/week

📅 **Timeline Breakdown**
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Phase                           Duration    % of Project
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Foundation                      8 days      10%
Business Case & Requirements    12 days     15%
Research & Strategic Planning   15 days     19%
Procurement & Vendor Selection  14 days     18%
Design & Review                 10 days     13%
Delivery Planning              8 days      10%
Compliance & Security          8 days      10%
Governance & Traceability      4 days      5%

🎯 **Key Achievements**
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

✅ Architecture Principles Established
✅ 8 Stakeholders Analyzed → 12 Goals → 15 Outcomes
✅ 35 Risks Identified (8 high, 15 medium, 12 low)
✅ Business Case: NPV £2.4M, ROI 187%, BCR 2.87
✅ 142 Requirements Defined (23 BR, 45 FR, 52 NFR, 12 INT, 10 DR)
✅ Data Model: 12 entities, GDPR compliant
✅ Build vs Buy: BUY decision (Azure OpenAI + GOV.UK services)
✅ Vendor Selected: Microsoft (92/100 score) via G-Cloud
✅ HLD + DLD Approved
✅ 67 User Stories → 12 Sprints (24 weeks delivery)
✅ TCoP: 13/13 points ✓
✅ Service Standard: 14/14 points (Ready for Beta)
✅ NCSC CAF: 14/14 principles ✓
✅ Traceability: 98% coverage ✓

📈 **Timeline Insights**
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

• Research phase (19% of project) was critical for build vs buy decision
• Wardley mapping enabled rapid vendor selection
• Parallel compliance work accelerated governance validation
• Peak velocity: Week 4 (requirements + data model + research)
• Critical path: Principles → Stakeholders → Requirements → Research → Vendor → Design Reviews

📄 **Document Contents**
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

The 2,400-line ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STORY-v1.0.md includes:

✓ Executive summary with timeline snapshot
✓ 4 timeline visualizations (Gantt, flowchart, table, pie chart)
✓ Timeline metrics analysis
✓ Milestone timeline
✓ 2 detailed narrative chapters (Design Review & Delivery Planning)
✓ Timeline insights & lessons learned
✓ Complete traceability chain with Mermaid diagrams
✓ Governance achievements mind map
✓ 5 comprehensive appendices (artifact register, activity log, DSM, command reference, glossary)

🔗 **Traceability Verified**
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Stakeholders (8) → Goals (12) → Outcomes (15)
Goals → Business Reqs (23) → Functional Reqs (45)
Requirements (142) → User Stories (67) → Sprints (12)
Data Model (12 entities) → Data Reqs (10) → CMDB CIs (28)
Requirements → Architecture Components → Tests

Coverage: 98% ✓

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

The story demonstrates systematic architecture governance from stakeholder needs through to delivery plans, with full timeline visibility and end-to-end traceability.

Adapt the summary based on actual project data. Show real numbers, real dates, real achievements.

Important Notes

1. Prerequisites first: Always check that architecture principles exist before generating a story. The principles command ($arckit-principles) is the foundation of the ArcKit governance framework and should be the FIRST command run in any project.

2. Use Write tool: The ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STORY-v1.0.md will be 2000-3000 lines. You MUST use the Write tool to avoid exceeding token limits.

3. Real data only: Replace ALL placeholders with real data extracted from artifacts. No "[PLACEHOLDER]" should remain in the final document.

4. Timeline emphasis: The story is primarily about the timeline. Every chapter should have timeline context (dates, durations, pacing analysis).

5. Git log preferred: If available, use git log for most accurate timeline. Fall back to file modification dates if needed.

6. Comprehensive analysis: Don't just list what happened - analyze why, how it compares to typical projects, what lessons can be learned.

7. Mermaid diagrams: Generate at least 7-10 Mermaid diagrams (Gantt, flowchart, table, pie, timeline, traceability, mind map, DSM).

8. Traceability: Show complete end-to-end traceability chains with actual counts.

9. Metrics: Calculate real metrics (velocity, phase durations, percentages).

10. Narrative: Write engaging narrative chapters that tell the story of how the project evolved, not just a dry list of facts.

11. Quality: This is a showcase document. Make it comprehensive, accurate, and professionally written.

• Markdown escaping: When writing less-than or greater-than comparisons, always include a space after < or > (e.g., < 3 seconds, > 99.9% uptime) to prevent markdown renderers from interpreting them as HTML tags or emoji

Example Usage

# Generate story for a specific project
$arckit-story Cabinet Office GenAI

# Generate story for project by number
$arckit-story 009

# Let user choose from list
$arckit-story

# Generate story for current directory
cd projects/009-cabinet-office-genai
$arckit-story .

Success Criteria

• ✅ Prerequisites checked (architecture principles exist)
• ✅ ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STORY-v1.0.md created in project directory
• ✅ All timeline data extracted from git log or file dates
• ✅ All placeholders replaced with real data
• ✅ 4 timeline visualizations generated
• ✅ 2 key narrative chapters written (Design Review, Delivery Planning)
• ✅ Timeline metrics calculated
• ✅ Timeline insights & lessons learned written
• ✅ Complete traceability chain documented
• ✅ All Mermaid diagrams generated with real data
• ✅ Comprehensive appendices included
• ✅ Document control metadata populated
• ✅ Concise summary shown to user

This command creates a comprehensive historical record and demonstration of the ArcKit governance framework in action, with timeline as a first-class feature throughout.