How do I install the Idea Validation skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add u9401066/idea-validation in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Idea Validation safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Idea Validation?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Idea Validation free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Idea Validation?

u9401066 (@u9401066) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Idea Validation by u9401066 — Agent Skill

Name: Idea Validation
Author: u9401066

Idea Validation

研究假說驗證與可行性評估框架。 LOAD THIS SKILL WHEN: hypothesis、假說、PICO、feasibility、可行性、testable、可驗證、研究計畫評估、check feasibility CAPABILITIES: 純指令技能，不需要專屬 MCP tool。利用 LLM 推理能力 + 現有 tools (list_saved_references, search_local_references) 完成分析。

u9401066 2a63325 3.3 KB Updated Sep 17, 2026

File contents

研究假說驗證與可行性評估技能

純指令技能。LLM 醫學知識 + compare_with_literature, list_saved_references, search_local_references, validate_concept。

觸發：hypothesis、假說、PICO、feasibility、可行性、testable、研究計畫評估

Framework 1: Hypothesis Validation

Step 1: PICO 分析

Component	偵測重點
Population	patients, subjects, ICU, surgical...
Intervention	treatment, therapy, drug, procedure...
Comparison	versus, vs, placebo, standard, control...
Outcome	mortality, survival, recovery, score, rate...

Step 2: Testability

Directional — higher/lower/better/worse/reduce? ✅ vs 只有描述性 ❌
Comparison — significantly/compared/than? ✅ vs 缺基準 ❌
Type — Null (no difference) vs Alternative (有方向)
Specificity — <10 words 太模糊, 10-50 適當, >50 過複雜

Step 3: Study Type Recommendation

假說特徵	建議設計
effect/efficacy/treatment	RCT or Cohort
risk factor/association	Cohort or Case-Control
prevalence/frequency	Cross-Sectional

Framework 2: Feasibility Assessment

Sample Size Quick Check

類型	注意
N ≤ 10	Case report/series
N < 30 RCT	Pilot or crossover
N ≥ 100	大多設計合理

Timeline by Study Type

類型	IRB	主要工作	分析寫作
RCT	2 mo	招募+收案 ÷3	÷4
Retrospective	1 mo	資料萃取 2 mo	÷2
SR	1 mo (protocol)	搜尋+篩選 ÷3	÷3

Feasibility Checklist (17 items, 5 categories)

Category	Critical Items	High Items
Data & Sample	資料可及、樣本可達	納排標準
Ethics	IRB plan、informed consent	privacy
Resources	—	funding, timeline, team, equipment
Methodology	primary outcome	stat plan, validated tools, confounders
Publication	—	target journal, reporting guideline, novelty

All Critical items must be ✅ before proceeding.

使用原則

PICO 分析用語意理解，非關鍵字匹配
可行性評估寧可保守
文獻比較用 compare_with_literature MCP tool

---name: idea-validationdescription: 研究假說驗證與可行性評估框架。 LOAD THIS SKILL WHEN: hypothesis、假說、PICO、feasibility、可行性、testable、可驗證、研究計畫評估、check feasibility CAPABILITIES: 純指令技能，不需要專屬 MCP tool。利用 LLM 推理能力 + 現有 tools (list_saved_references, search_local_references) 完成分析。---# 研究假說驗證與可行性評估技能純指令技能。LLM 醫學知識 + `compare_with_literature`, `list_saved_references`, `search_local_references`, `validate_concept`。觸發：hypothesis、假說、PICO、feasibility、可行性、testable、研究計畫評估---## Framework 1: Hypothesis Validation### Step 1: PICO 分析| Component | 偵測重點 || ---------------- | --------------------------------------------- || **P**opulation | patients, subjects, ICU, surgical... || **I**ntervention | treatment, therapy, drug, procedure... || **C**omparison | versus, vs, placebo, standard, control... || **O**utcome | mortality, survival, recovery, score, rate... |### Step 2: Testability1. **Directional** — higher/lower/better/worse/reduce? ✅ vs 只有描述性 ❌2. **Comparison** — significantly/compared/than? ✅ vs 缺基準 ❌3. **Type** — Null (no difference) vs Alternative (有方向)4. **Specificity** — <10 words 太模糊, 10-50 適當, >50 過複雜### Step 3: Study Type Recommendation| 假說特徵 | 建議設計 || ------------------------- | ---------------------- || effect/efficacy/treatment | RCT or Cohort || risk factor/association | Cohort or Case-Control || prevalence/frequency | Cross-Sectional |---## Framework 2: Feasibility Assessment### Sample Size Quick Check| 類型 | 注意 || ---------- | ------------------ || N ≤ 10 | Case report/series || N < 30 RCT | Pilot or crossover || N ≥ 100 | 大多設計合理 |### Timeline by Study Type| 類型 | IRB | 主要工作 | 分析寫作 || ------------- | --------------- | ------------- | -------- || RCT | 2 mo | 招募+收案 ÷3 | ÷4 || Retrospective | 1 mo | 資料萃取 2 mo | ÷2 || SR | 1 mo (protocol) | 搜尋+篩選 ÷3 | ÷3 |### Feasibility Checklist (17 items, 5 categories)| Category | Critical Items | High Items || ------------- | -------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- || Data & Sample | 資料可及、樣本可達 | 納排標準 || Ethics | IRB plan、informed consent | privacy || Resources | — | funding, timeline, team, equipment || Methodology | primary outcome | stat plan, validated tools, confounders || Publication | — | target journal, reporting guideline, novelty |**All Critical items must be ✅ before proceeding.**---## 使用原則1. PICO 分析用語意理解，非關鍵字匹配2. 可行性評估寧可保守3. 文獻比較用 `compare_with_literature` MCP tool

Frequently asked questions