ulpi-io Git Workflow Strategy
Table of Contents
Overview
Establish efficient Git workflows that support team collaboration, code quality, and deployment readiness through structured branching strategies and merge patterns.
When to Use
- Team collaboration setup
- Release management
- Feature development coordination
- Hotfix procedures
- Code review processes
- CI/CD integration planning
Quick Start
Minimal working example:
# Initialize GitFlow
git flow init -d
# Start a feature
git flow feature start new-feature
# Work on feature
git add .
git commit -m "feat: implement new feature"
git flow feature finish new-feature
# Start a release
git flow release start 1.0.0
# Update version numbers, changelog
git add .
git commit -m "chore: bump version to 1.0.0"
git flow release finish 1.0.0
# Create hotfix
git flow hotfix start 1.0.1
# Fix critical bug
git add .
git commit -m "fix: critical bug in production"
git flow hotfix finish 1.0.1
Reference Guides
Detailed implementations in the references/ directory:
| Guide | Contents |
|---|---|
| GitFlow Workflow Setup | GitFlow Workflow Setup, GitHub Flow Workflow, Trunk-Based Development, Git Configuration for Workflows (+1 more) |
| Merge Strategy Script | Merge Strategy Script |
| Collaborative Workflow with Code Review | Collaborative Workflow with Code Review |
Best Practices
✅ DO
- Choose workflow matching team size and release cycle
- Keep feature branches short-lived (< 3 days)
- Use descriptive branch names with type prefix
- Require code review before merging to main
- Enforce protection rules on main/release branches
- Rebase frequently to minimize conflicts
- Write atomic, logical commits
- Keep commit messages clear and consistent
❌ DON'T
- Commit directly to main branch
- Create long-lived feature branches
- Use vague branch names (dev, test, temp)
- Merge without code review
- Mix multiple features in one branch
- Force push to shared branches
- Ignore failing CI checks
- Merge with merge commits in TBD