Flywheel Sync (ORBIT System)
A meta-skill that operates above all other skills in the launch engine, auditing the health of skill-to-skill connections, identifying broken handoffs, redundant outputs, and bottlenecks, then generating a continuous improvement roadmap. ORBIT ensures the entire product launch system functions as an integrated flywheel rather than a collection of disconnected processes.
When to Use
- Auditing whether the launch engine skills are working together effectively
- Diagnosing why a launch process feels slow, disconnected, or redundant
- Identifying gaps where important outputs are missing or not being consumed
- Checking if skill cadences are aligned with business rhythms
- Building a continuous improvement roadmap for the overall launch system
- Onboarding new team members to understand how skills interconnect
- Preparing for a major launch by verifying all system connections are healthy
What You'll Need
Critical inputs (ask if not provided):
- List of active skills and their current usage status
- Recent outputs from each skill (or confirmation that skills have been run)
- Known pain points or friction in the current launch process
- Team structure and ownership map across skills
- Launch cadence (how often launches occur, what types)
Nice-to-have:
- Outputs from the most recent run of each skill
- Timestamps of last skill execution
- Team feedback on handoff quality and timing
- Historical launch debriefs (from launch-debrief)
- Current launch calendar and upcoming milestones
Process
Step 1: Map the Full Skill Connection Graph
Document every skill-to-skill connection in the launch engine with its expected data flow.
Skill Connection Matrix:
| From Skill |
To Skill |
Output Passed |
Format |
Timing |
Status |
| signal-radar |
battle-scanner |
Market signals, trend data |
Report |
Weekly to Monthly |
|
| signal-radar |
position-lock |
Emerging trends, whitespace |
Report |
Weekly to Quarterly |
|
| battle-scanner |
position-lock |
Competitive landscape, gaps |
Framework |
Monthly to Quarterly |
|
| battle-scanner |
enablement-forge |
Competitive battle cards |
Cards |
Monthly to Per-launch |
|
| position-lock |
demand-engine |
Messaging framework, value props |
Framework |
Quarterly to Per-launch |
|
| position-lock |
enablement-forge |
Messaging hierarchy, proof points |
Framework |
Quarterly to Per-launch |
|
| demand-engine |
budget-allocator |
WAVE scores, channel strategy |
Scored list |
Per-launch |
|
| demand-engine |
launch-command |
Channel activation plan |
Plan |
Per-launch |
|
| journey-architect |
demand-engine |
Touchpoint map, stage definitions |
Map |
Per-launch |
|
| journey-architect |
growth-loop |
Post-purchase journey stages |
Map |
Per-launch |
|
| enablement-forge |
launch-command |
Sales materials inventory |
Checklist |
Per-launch |
|
| budget-allocator |
launch-command |
Spend allocation plan |
Model |
Per-launch |
|
| launch-command |
launch-pulse |
Launch plan, workstream status |
Dashboard |
Per-launch |
|
| launch-pulse |
growth-loop |
Adoption and retention metrics |
Metrics |
Continuous |
|
| launch-pulse |
launch-debrief |
Actuals vs targets |
Scorecard |
T+30, T+90 |
|
| growth-loop |
demand-engine |
Referral pipeline, case studies |
Assets |
Continuous |
|
| growth-loop |
signal-radar |
Customer signals, advocacy data |
Signals |
Continuous |
|
| launch-debrief |
All skills |
Updated benchmarks, learnings |
Playbook |
Post-launch |
|
| flywheel-sync |
All skills |
Health report, improvement roadmap |
Dashboard |
Quarterly |
|
Step 2: Score Each Connection (Orchestration Audit)
For every connection in the matrix, score its health on a 0-3 scale.
Connection Health Scale:
| Score |
Status |
Definition |
Indicators |
| 0 |
Broken |
No data flows between skills |
Output exists but is never consumed, or skill is not run |
| 1 |
Degraded |
Data flows but with issues |
Wrong format, stale data, manual transfer required, partial coverage |
| 2 |
Functioning |
Data flows reliably with minor gaps |
Mostly automated, occasional format mismatch, acceptable lag |
| 3 |
Optimized |
Seamless, timely, complete data flow |
Fully automated handoff, correct format, consumed within SLA |
Connection Audit Table:
| # |
Connection |
Score (0-3) |
Issues Found |
Impact |
Remediation |
| 1 |
signal-radar to battle-scanner |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
signal-radar to position-lock |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
battle-scanner to position-lock |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
battle-scanner to enablement-forge |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
position-lock to demand-engine |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
position-lock to enablement-forge |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
demand-engine to budget-allocator |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
demand-engine to launch-command |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
journey-architect to demand-engine |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
journey-architect to growth-loop |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
enablement-forge to launch-command |
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
budget-allocator to launch-command |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
launch-command to launch-pulse |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
launch-pulse to growth-loop |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
launch-pulse to launch-debrief |
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
growth-loop to demand-engine |
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
growth-loop to signal-radar |
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
launch-debrief to All skills |
|
|
|
|
Overall Orchestration Health = (Sum of connection scores) / (Number of connections x 3) x 100%
Step 3: Redundancy and Gap Analysis
Identify outputs that overlap, outputs that are missing, and outputs that are produced but never consumed.
Output Inventory:
| Skill |
Output |
Consumed By |
Status |
Action Needed |
| signal-radar |
Market Signal Report |
battle-scanner, position-lock |
Active / Stale / Missing |
|
| battle-scanner |
Competitive Landscape |
position-lock, enablement-forge |
|
|
| position-lock |
Messaging Framework |
demand-engine, enablement-forge, launch-command |
|
|
| demand-engine |
Channel Strategy |
budget-allocator, launch-command |
|
|
| journey-architect |
Journey Map |
demand-engine, growth-loop |
|
|
| enablement-forge |
Sales Materials |
launch-command, sales team |
|
|
| budget-allocator |
Budget Model |
launch-command |
|
|
| launch-command |
Readiness Dashboard |
launch-pulse, all teams |
|
|
| launch-pulse |
Metrics Framework |
growth-loop, launch-debrief |
|
|
| growth-loop |
Health Scores |
signal-radar, demand-engine |
|
|
| launch-debrief |
Improvement Playbook |
All skills (next cycle) |
|
|
Classification Key:
| Category |
Definition |
Risk |
Action |
| Redundant |
Two+ skills produce overlapping outputs |
Confusion, wasted effort |
Consolidate into single source of truth |
| Gap |
Expected output is missing, no skill produces it |
Blind spot, broken handoff |
Assign to existing skill or create new output |
| Waste |
Output is produced but no skill consumes it |
Wasted effort |
Deprecate or find consumer |
| Orphan |
Skill needs input but no skill provides it |
Manual workaround, delays |
Create upstream dependency |
Redundancy and Gap Findings:
| # |
Finding |
Category |
Affected Skills |
Severity |
Recommended Action |
| 1 |
|
Redundant/Gap/Waste/Orphan |
|
High/Med/Low |
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Step 4: Bottleneck Identification
Score each skill as a potential bottleneck based on three factors.
Bottleneck Scoring Model:
| Skill |
Delay Impact (1-10) |
Quality Impact (1-10) |
Confusion (1-10) |
Bottleneck Score |
| signal-radar |
|
|
|
|
| battle-scanner |
|
|
|
|
| position-lock |
|
|
|
|
| demand-engine |
|
|
|
|
| journey-architect |
|
|
|
|
| enablement-forge |
|
|
|
|
| budget-allocator |
|
|
|
|
| launch-command |
|
|
|
|
| launch-pulse |
|
|
|
|
| growth-loop |
|
|
|
|
| launch-debrief |
|
|
|
|
| flywheel-sync |
|
|
|
|
Bottleneck Score Formula:
Bottleneck_Score = (Delay_Impact x 0.40) + (Quality_Impact x 0.35) + (Confusion x 0.25)
Factor Definitions:
| Factor |
Weight |
1 (Low) |
5 (Medium) |
10 (High) |
| Delay Impact |
40% |
Skill runs on time, outputs delivered within SLA |
Occasional delays, 1-2 week lag |
Chronic delays, blocks downstream skills for 3+ weeks |
| Quality Impact |
35% |
Outputs are complete, accurate, actionable |
Occasional gaps or inaccuracies |
Outputs frequently incomplete, require rework |
| Confusion |
25% |
Clear ownership, well-understood process |
Some ambiguity on who owns what |
Teams unsure of process, frequent miscommunication |
Bottleneck Classification:
| Score Range |
Classification |
Action |
| 7.0 - 10.0 |
Critical Bottleneck |
Immediate intervention, process redesign, additional resourcing |
| 5.0 - 6.9 |
Moderate Bottleneck |
Optimization needed, SLA tightening, template improvement |
| 3.0 - 4.9 |
Minor Friction |
Monitor, address in next quarterly review |
| < 3.0 |
Healthy |
No action needed |
Step 5: Tempo Alignment Check
Verify that each skill runs at the appropriate cadence relative to the business rhythm.
Skill Tempo Map:
| Skill |
Recommended Cadence |
Actual Cadence |
Aligned? |
Adjustment Needed |
| signal-radar |
Weekly scan, monthly deep dive |
|
Yes/No |
|
| battle-scanner |
Monthly update, per-launch refresh |
|
|
|
| position-lock |
Quarterly refresh, per-launch validation |
|
|
|
| demand-engine |
Per-launch build, monthly optimization |
|
|
|
| journey-architect |
Per-launch, annual strategic refresh |
|
|
|
| enablement-forge |
Per-launch, monthly asset refresh |
|
|
|
| budget-allocator |
Per-launch, monthly rebalancing |
|
|
|
| launch-command |
Per-launch (T-60 through T+30) |
|
|
|
| launch-pulse |
Per-launch setup, continuous monitoring |
|
|
|
| growth-loop |
Continuous, quarterly program review |
|
|
|
| launch-debrief |
T+30 and T+90 per launch |
|
|
|
| flywheel-sync |
Quarterly health check |
|
|
|
Tempo Misalignment Patterns:
| Pattern |
Symptom |
Fix |
| Too slow upstream, fast downstream |
Downstream skills work with stale inputs |
Increase upstream cadence or add trigger-based updates |
| Too fast upstream, slow downstream |
Outputs pile up unconsumed |
Batch upstream outputs or increase downstream cadence |
| Event-driven gap |
Launch skills idle between launches |
Add continuous improvement tasks between launches |
| Missing trigger |
Skill should run but nothing initiates it |
Add calendar trigger or upstream completion trigger |
Step 6: Generate the Integration Health Dashboard
Compile all analyses into a single health view.
System Health Summary:
| Dimension |
Score |
Status |
Trend |
Top Issue |
| Orchestration Health |
/100% |
Green/Yellow/Red |
Up/Down/Flat |
|
| Redundancy/Gap Score |
/10 findings |
|
|
|
| Bottleneck Score (avg) |
/10 |
|
|
|
| Tempo Alignment |
/12 aligned |
|
|
|
| Overall System Health |
/100% |
|
|
|
Overall System Health Calculation:
System_Health = (Orchestration_Health x 0.35) + (Gap_Score_Inverse x 0.25)
+ (Bottleneck_Score_Inverse x 0.25) + (Tempo_Alignment x 0.15)
Critical Path Identification:
Map the longest dependency chain through the skill graph and identify which skills are on the critical path for each launch.
| Critical Path Step |
Skill |
Duration |
Slack |
On Critical Path? |
| 1 |
signal-radar |
Ongoing |
N/A |
Yes (foundation) |
| 2 |
battle-scanner |
2 weeks |
1 week |
Yes |
| 3 |
position-lock |
3 weeks |
0 |
Yes (bottleneck risk) |
| 4 |
demand-engine |
2 weeks |
1 week |
Yes |
| 5 |
budget-allocator |
1 week |
2 weeks |
No |
| 6 |
launch-command |
8 weeks (T-60 to T-0) |
0 |
Yes (controls timeline) |
| 7 |
launch-pulse |
2 weeks setup |
1 week |
Yes |
| 8 |
growth-loop |
Continuous post-launch |
N/A |
No (parallel) |
| 9 |
launch-debrief |
T+30 |
2 weeks |
No (post-launch) |
Step 7: Build the Continuous Improvement Roadmap
Prioritize all identified issues into a phased improvement plan.
Improvement Roadmap:
| Phase |
Timeline |
Focus |
Key Actions |
Success Metric |
| Quick Wins |
Next 2 weeks |
Fix broken connections (score 0-1) |
Repair data flows, create missing templates |
All connections >= 1 |
| Optimize |
Next 30 days |
Reduce bottlenecks, align tempo |
Process redesign for top 2 bottlenecks |
Avg bottleneck score < 5.0 |
| Integrate |
Next 60 days |
Eliminate gaps and redundancies |
Consolidate overlapping outputs, fill gaps |
Zero critical gaps |
| Automate |
Next 90 days |
Systematize handoffs and triggers |
Automated triggers between skills, SLA monitoring |
Orchestration health >= 80% |
| Scale |
Ongoing |
Continuous improvement culture |
Quarterly flywheel-sync reviews, feedback loops |
System health >= 85% |
Output
Save to outputs/flywheel-sync/
Deliverables:
- System Health Dashboard -- Overall system health percentage, orchestration health, gap/redundancy count, average bottleneck score, tempo alignment, and critical path identification with visual dependency map
- Gap and Redundancy Report -- Every output classified as active, redundant, gap, waste, or orphan with recommended consolidation, creation, or deprecation actions
- Bottleneck Analysis -- Every skill scored on delay impact, quality impact, and confusion with bottleneck classification (Critical/Moderate/Minor/Healthy) and specific remediation plans
- Continuous Improvement Roadmap -- Phased plan (Quick Wins through Scale) with timeline, key actions, success metrics, and owners for each improvement initiative
Chain Connections
- Receives from: All skills (outputs, timing data, quality feedback, connection health signals)
- Feeds back into: All skills (health assessments, improvement priorities, tempo recommendations, integration fixes)
- Enhanced by: launch-debrief (systemic patterns across launches), launch-command (critical path data), signal-radar (external timing pressures)
1---2name: flywheel-sync3description: Meta-skill that audits health of the entire product launch engine, identifies broken links between phases, and generates improvement roadmaps. Use when: system health, skill audit, launch engine health, are our skills working together, process audit, workflow health check.4---56# Flywheel Sync (ORBIT System)78A meta-skill that operates above all other skills in the launch engine, auditing the health of skill-to-skill connections, identifying broken handoffs, redundant outputs, and bottlenecks, then generating a continuous improvement roadmap. ORBIT ensures the entire product launch system functions as an integrated flywheel rather than a collection of disconnected processes.910## When to Use11- Auditing whether the launch engine skills are working together effectively12- Diagnosing why a launch process feels slow, disconnected, or redundant13- Identifying gaps where important outputs are missing or not being consumed14- Checking if skill cadences are aligned with business rhythms15- Building a continuous improvement roadmap for the overall launch system16- Onboarding new team members to understand how skills interconnect17- Preparing for a major launch by verifying all system connections are healthy1819## What You'll Need2021**Critical inputs (ask if not provided):**22- List of active skills and their current usage status23- Recent outputs from each skill (or confirmation that skills have been run)24- Known pain points or friction in the current launch process25- Team structure and ownership map across skills26- Launch cadence (how often launches occur, what types)2728**Nice-to-have:**29- Outputs from the most recent run of each skill30- Timestamps of last skill execution31- Team feedback on handoff quality and timing32- Historical launch debriefs (from launch-debrief)33- Current launch calendar and upcoming milestones3435## Process3637### Step 1: Map the Full Skill Connection Graph3839Document every skill-to-skill connection in the launch engine with its expected data flow.4041**Skill Connection Matrix:**4243| From Skill | To Skill | Output Passed | Format | Timing | Status |44|-----------|---------|--------------|--------|--------|--------|45| signal-radar | battle-scanner | Market signals, trend data | Report | Weekly to Monthly | |46| signal-radar | position-lock | Emerging trends, whitespace | Report | Weekly to Quarterly | |47| battle-scanner | position-lock | Competitive landscape, gaps | Framework | Monthly to Quarterly | |48| battle-scanner | enablement-forge | Competitive battle cards | Cards | Monthly to Per-launch | |49| position-lock | demand-engine | Messaging framework, value props | Framework | Quarterly to Per-launch | |50| position-lock | enablement-forge | Messaging hierarchy, proof points | Framework | Quarterly to Per-launch | |51| demand-engine | budget-allocator | WAVE scores, channel strategy | Scored list | Per-launch | |52| demand-engine | launch-command | Channel activation plan | Plan | Per-launch | |53| journey-architect | demand-engine | Touchpoint map, stage definitions | Map | Per-launch | |54| journey-architect | growth-loop | Post-purchase journey stages | Map | Per-launch | |55| enablement-forge | launch-command | Sales materials inventory | Checklist | Per-launch | |56| budget-allocator | launch-command | Spend allocation plan | Model | Per-launch | |57| launch-command | launch-pulse | Launch plan, workstream status | Dashboard | Per-launch | |58| launch-pulse | growth-loop | Adoption and retention metrics | Metrics | Continuous | |59| launch-pulse | launch-debrief | Actuals vs targets | Scorecard | T+30, T+90 | |60| growth-loop | demand-engine | Referral pipeline, case studies | Assets | Continuous | |61| growth-loop | signal-radar | Customer signals, advocacy data | Signals | Continuous | |62| launch-debrief | All skills | Updated benchmarks, learnings | Playbook | Post-launch | |63| flywheel-sync | All skills | Health report, improvement roadmap | Dashboard | Quarterly | |6465### Step 2: Score Each Connection (Orchestration Audit)6667For every connection in the matrix, score its health on a 0-3 scale.6869**Connection Health Scale:**7071| Score | Status | Definition | Indicators |72|-------|--------|-----------|------------|73| 0 | Broken | No data flows between skills | Output exists but is never consumed, or skill is not run |74| 1 | Degraded | Data flows but with issues | Wrong format, stale data, manual transfer required, partial coverage |75| 2 | Functioning | Data flows reliably with minor gaps | Mostly automated, occasional format mismatch, acceptable lag |76| 3 | Optimized | Seamless, timely, complete data flow | Fully automated handoff, correct format, consumed within SLA |7778**Connection Audit Table:**7980| # | Connection | Score (0-3) | Issues Found | Impact | Remediation |81|---|-----------|-------------|-------------|--------|-------------|82| 1 | signal-radar to battle-scanner | | | | |83| 2 | signal-radar to position-lock | | | | |84| 3 | battle-scanner to position-lock | | | | |85| 4 | battle-scanner to enablement-forge | | | | |86| 5 | position-lock to demand-engine | | | | |87| 6 | position-lock to enablement-forge | | | | |88| 7 | demand-engine to budget-allocator | | | | |89| 8 | demand-engine to launch-command | | | | |90| 9 | journey-architect to demand-engine | | | | |91| 10 | journey-architect to growth-loop | | | | |92| 11 | enablement-forge to launch-command | | | | |93| 12 | budget-allocator to launch-command | | | | |94| 13 | launch-command to launch-pulse | | | | |95| 14 | launch-pulse to growth-loop | | | | |96| 15 | launch-pulse to launch-debrief | | | | |97| 16 | growth-loop to demand-engine | | | | |98| 17 | growth-loop to signal-radar | | | | |99| 18 | launch-debrief to All skills | | | | |100101**Overall Orchestration Health** = (Sum of connection scores) / (Number of connections x 3) x 100%102103### Step 3: Redundancy and Gap Analysis104105Identify outputs that overlap, outputs that are missing, and outputs that are produced but never consumed.106107**Output Inventory:**108109| Skill | Output | Consumed By | Status | Action Needed |110|-------|--------|-----------|--------|--------------|111| signal-radar | Market Signal Report | battle-scanner, position-lock | Active / Stale / Missing | |112| battle-scanner | Competitive Landscape | position-lock, enablement-forge | | |113| position-lock | Messaging Framework | demand-engine, enablement-forge, launch-command | | |114| demand-engine | Channel Strategy | budget-allocator, launch-command | | |115| journey-architect | Journey Map | demand-engine, growth-loop | | |116| enablement-forge | Sales Materials | launch-command, sales team | | |117| budget-allocator | Budget Model | launch-command | | |118| launch-command | Readiness Dashboard | launch-pulse, all teams | | |119| launch-pulse | Metrics Framework | growth-loop, launch-debrief | | |120| growth-loop | Health Scores | signal-radar, demand-engine | | |121| launch-debrief | Improvement Playbook | All skills (next cycle) | | |122123**Classification Key:**124125| Category | Definition | Risk | Action |126|----------|-----------|------|--------|127| Redundant | Two+ skills produce overlapping outputs | Confusion, wasted effort | Consolidate into single source of truth |128| Gap | Expected output is missing, no skill produces it | Blind spot, broken handoff | Assign to existing skill or create new output |129| Waste | Output is produced but no skill consumes it | Wasted effort | Deprecate or find consumer |130| Orphan | Skill needs input but no skill provides it | Manual workaround, delays | Create upstream dependency |131132**Redundancy and Gap Findings:**133134| # | Finding | Category | Affected Skills | Severity | Recommended Action |135|---|---------|----------|----------------|----------|-------------------|136| 1 | | Redundant/Gap/Waste/Orphan | | High/Med/Low | |137| 2 | | | | | |138| 3 | | | | | |139140### Step 4: Bottleneck Identification141142Score each skill as a potential bottleneck based on three factors.143144**Bottleneck Scoring Model:**145146| Skill | Delay Impact (1-10) | Quality Impact (1-10) | Confusion (1-10) | Bottleneck Score |147|-------|---------------------|----------------------|------------------|-----------------|148| signal-radar | | | | |149| battle-scanner | | | | |150| position-lock | | | | |151| demand-engine | | | | |152| journey-architect | | | | |153| enablement-forge | | | | |154| budget-allocator | | | | |155| launch-command | | | | |156| launch-pulse | | | | |157| growth-loop | | | | |158| launch-debrief | | | | |159| flywheel-sync | | | | |160161**Bottleneck Score Formula:**162163```164Bottleneck_Score = (Delay_Impact x 0.40) + (Quality_Impact x 0.35) + (Confusion x 0.25)165```166167**Factor Definitions:**168169| Factor | Weight | 1 (Low) | 5 (Medium) | 10 (High) |170|--------|--------|---------|-----------|-----------|171| Delay Impact | 40% | Skill runs on time, outputs delivered within SLA | Occasional delays, 1-2 week lag | Chronic delays, blocks downstream skills for 3+ weeks |172| Quality Impact | 35% | Outputs are complete, accurate, actionable | Occasional gaps or inaccuracies | Outputs frequently incomplete, require rework |173| Confusion | 25% | Clear ownership, well-understood process | Some ambiguity on who owns what | Teams unsure of process, frequent miscommunication |174175**Bottleneck Classification:**176177| Score Range | Classification | Action |178|------------|---------------|--------|179| 7.0 - 10.0 | Critical Bottleneck | Immediate intervention, process redesign, additional resourcing |180| 5.0 - 6.9 | Moderate Bottleneck | Optimization needed, SLA tightening, template improvement |181| 3.0 - 4.9 | Minor Friction | Monitor, address in next quarterly review |182| < 3.0 | Healthy | No action needed |183184### Step 5: Tempo Alignment Check185186Verify that each skill runs at the appropriate cadence relative to the business rhythm.187188**Skill Tempo Map:**189190| Skill | Recommended Cadence | Actual Cadence | Aligned? | Adjustment Needed |191|-------|-------------------|---------------|----------|------------------|192| signal-radar | Weekly scan, monthly deep dive | | Yes/No | |193| battle-scanner | Monthly update, per-launch refresh | | | |194| position-lock | Quarterly refresh, per-launch validation | | | |195| demand-engine | Per-launch build, monthly optimization | | | |196| journey-architect | Per-launch, annual strategic refresh | | | |197| enablement-forge | Per-launch, monthly asset refresh | | | |198| budget-allocator | Per-launch, monthly rebalancing | | | |199| launch-command | Per-launch (T-60 through T+30) | | | |200| launch-pulse | Per-launch setup, continuous monitoring | | | |201| growth-loop | Continuous, quarterly program review | | | |202| launch-debrief | T+30 and T+90 per launch | | | |203| flywheel-sync | Quarterly health check | | | |204205**Tempo Misalignment Patterns:**206207| Pattern | Symptom | Fix |208|---------|---------|-----|209| Too slow upstream, fast downstream | Downstream skills work with stale inputs | Increase upstream cadence or add trigger-based updates |210| Too fast upstream, slow downstream | Outputs pile up unconsumed | Batch upstream outputs or increase downstream cadence |211| Event-driven gap | Launch skills idle between launches | Add continuous improvement tasks between launches |212| Missing trigger | Skill should run but nothing initiates it | Add calendar trigger or upstream completion trigger |213214### Step 6: Generate the Integration Health Dashboard215216Compile all analyses into a single health view.217218**System Health Summary:**219220| Dimension | Score | Status | Trend | Top Issue |221|-----------|-------|--------|-------|-----------|222| Orchestration Health | /100% | Green/Yellow/Red | Up/Down/Flat | |223| Redundancy/Gap Score | /10 findings | | | |224| Bottleneck Score (avg) | /10 | | | |225| Tempo Alignment | /12 aligned | | | |226| Overall System Health | /100% | | | |227228**Overall System Health Calculation:**229230```231System_Health = (Orchestration_Health x 0.35) + (Gap_Score_Inverse x 0.25)232 + (Bottleneck_Score_Inverse x 0.25) + (Tempo_Alignment x 0.15)233```234235**Critical Path Identification:**236Map the longest dependency chain through the skill graph and identify which skills are on the critical path for each launch.237238| Critical Path Step | Skill | Duration | Slack | On Critical Path? |239|-------------------|-------|----------|-------|------------------|240| 1 | signal-radar | Ongoing | N/A | Yes (foundation) |241| 2 | battle-scanner | 2 weeks | 1 week | Yes |242| 3 | position-lock | 3 weeks | 0 | Yes (bottleneck risk) |243| 4 | demand-engine | 2 weeks | 1 week | Yes |244| 5 | budget-allocator | 1 week | 2 weeks | No |245| 6 | launch-command | 8 weeks (T-60 to T-0) | 0 | Yes (controls timeline) |246| 7 | launch-pulse | 2 weeks setup | 1 week | Yes |247| 8 | growth-loop | Continuous post-launch | N/A | No (parallel) |248| 9 | launch-debrief | T+30 | 2 weeks | No (post-launch) |249250### Step 7: Build the Continuous Improvement Roadmap251252Prioritize all identified issues into a phased improvement plan.253254**Improvement Roadmap:**255256| Phase | Timeline | Focus | Key Actions | Success Metric |257|-------|---------|-------|-------------|---------------|258| Quick Wins | Next 2 weeks | Fix broken connections (score 0-1) | Repair data flows, create missing templates | All connections >= 1 |259| Optimize | Next 30 days | Reduce bottlenecks, align tempo | Process redesign for top 2 bottlenecks | Avg bottleneck score < 5.0 |260| Integrate | Next 60 days | Eliminate gaps and redundancies | Consolidate overlapping outputs, fill gaps | Zero critical gaps |261| Automate | Next 90 days | Systematize handoffs and triggers | Automated triggers between skills, SLA monitoring | Orchestration health >= 80% |262| Scale | Ongoing | Continuous improvement culture | Quarterly flywheel-sync reviews, feedback loops | System health >= 85% |263264## Output265266Save to `outputs/flywheel-sync/`267268### Deliverables:2691. **System Health Dashboard** -- Overall system health percentage, orchestration health, gap/redundancy count, average bottleneck score, tempo alignment, and critical path identification with visual dependency map2702. **Gap and Redundancy Report** -- Every output classified as active, redundant, gap, waste, or orphan with recommended consolidation, creation, or deprecation actions2713. **Bottleneck Analysis** -- Every skill scored on delay impact, quality impact, and confusion with bottleneck classification (Critical/Moderate/Minor/Healthy) and specific remediation plans2724. **Continuous Improvement Roadmap** -- Phased plan (Quick Wins through Scale) with timeline, key actions, success metrics, and owners for each improvement initiative273274## Chain Connections275- **Receives from:** All skills (outputs, timing data, quality feedback, connection health signals)276- **Feeds back into:** All skills (health assessments, improvement priorities, tempo recommendations, integration fixes)277- **Enhanced by:** launch-debrief (systemic patterns across launches), launch-command (critical path data), signal-radar (external timing pressures)