vidit19sharma /neo:review — summon smith
Changes in scope: !git diff --stat HEAD 2>/dev/null | tail -5 || echo "not a git repo — review working tree by file list"
Steps
Scope: default = all uncommitted changes (
git diff HEAD+ untracked files). If the user named a branch, commit range, or files, use that instead. If the tree is clean and no scope was given, ask what to review.Spawn smith (fresh context — no bias toward code written this session). The 6-section contract. CONTEXT: the diff scope (file list + how to view it:
git diff HEAD -- <paths>), what the change was SUPPOSED to do (one paragraph — from the session, the plan artifact, or ask the user), and the project's test command from CLAUDE.md. EXPECTED OUTCOME: verdict block — APPROVE or BLOCK, blocking findings with file:line and evidence, replication check across the codebase, what was verified by execution, what was NOT examined.Relay honestly: verdict verbatim. BLOCK findings → offer to fix (trinity for mechanical fixes, main thread for judgment calls). Never soften a BLOCK into "minor notes".
Re-review after fixes: send smith the same context plus what changed (continue the session if possible) — a fix pass without re-review is an unverified fix.