Azure Cosmos DB Application Developer
Purpose
Guide Azure Cosmos DB application-development decisions without pretending relational habits, scan-heavy queries, or cross-partition assumptions will scale safely.
When to use
Use this skill when the user asks for:
- Azure Cosmos DB data-model or document-shape design,
- partition-key choice from an application access-pattern perspective,
- point reads, query design, indexing, or SDK usage guidance,
- transactional batch, change feed, or consistency-aware client behavior questions,
- code-facing Cosmos DB design review for APIs or services.
Do not use this skill as a substitute for:
- pure control-plane platform review when the question is mainly throughput, failover, or account governance,
- generic application debugging unrelated to Cosmos DB,
- RBAC-only analysis when the main question is access governance rather than application data design,
- Mongo vCore vector-search-specific implementation unless the user explicitly asks for that API surface.
Lean operating rules
- Prefer Microsoft Learn documentation through the user's configured documentation MCP, then sampled read-only Azure evidence when the active client exposes it, then sanitized user evidence.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad scope, vague partition keys, and RU-blind advice.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
References
Load these only when needed:
- Operations guide — use for service-specific pitfalls, design rules, verification targets, and pushback criteria.
- MCP and evidence path — use when choosing documentation-based evidence, sampled read-only Azure evidence, or sanitized user evidence.
- Safety checklist — use for evidence labels, risk gates, mutation boundaries, approval rules, and credential boundaries.
- Workflow and output contract — use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.
- Official sources — use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.
Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main design or operational risks,
- the safest next actions,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.
1---2name: azure-cosmosdb-application-developer3description: Azure Cosmos DB Application Developer4---56# Azure Cosmos DB Application Developer78## Purpose910Guide Azure Cosmos DB application-development decisions without pretending relational habits, scan-heavy queries, or cross-partition assumptions will scale safely.1112## When to use1314Use this skill when the user asks for:1516- Azure Cosmos DB data-model or document-shape design,17- partition-key choice from an application access-pattern perspective,18- point reads, query design, indexing, or SDK usage guidance,19- transactional batch, change feed, or consistency-aware client behavior questions,20- code-facing Cosmos DB design review for APIs or services.2122Do not use this skill as a substitute for:2324- pure control-plane platform review when the question is mainly throughput, failover, or account governance,25- generic application debugging unrelated to Cosmos DB,26- RBAC-only analysis when the main question is access governance rather than application data design,27- Mongo vCore vector-search-specific implementation unless the user explicitly asks for that API surface.2829## Lean operating rules3031- Prefer Microsoft Learn documentation through the user's configured documentation MCP, then sampled read-only Azure evidence when the active client exposes it, then sanitized user evidence.32- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.33- Challenge broad scope, vague partition keys, and RU-blind advice.34- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.3536## References3738Load these only when needed:3940- [Operations guide](references/cosmosdb-application-design.md) — use for service-specific pitfalls, design rules, verification targets, and pushback criteria.41- [MCP and evidence path](references/mcp-and-evidence.md) — use when choosing documentation-based evidence, sampled read-only Azure evidence, or sanitized user evidence.42- [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use for evidence labels, risk gates, mutation boundaries, approval rules, and credential boundaries.43- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.44- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.4546## Response minimum4748Return, at minimum:4950- the scoped target and evidence level,51- the main design or operational risks,52- the safest next actions,53- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.