Azure Governance Policy Guardrails
Purpose
Design or review Azure governance guardrails with Azure Policy in a way that is enforceable, scope-aware, and safe to roll out.
When to use
Use this skill when the user asks for:
- Azure Policy design or review,
- initiatives versus single policy choices,
- management-group or subscription assignment placement,
- exclusions, exemptions, or inheritance concerns,
- tag governance,
- allowed locations, resource types, or SKU restrictions,
- brownfield governance hardening,
- compliance enforcement rollout safety.
Do not use this as a substitute for full regulatory interpretation, SOC operations, or writing full organization-specific policy JSON unless the user asks for that next.
Lean operating rules
- Prefer Microsoft Learn documentation through the user's configured documentation MCP, then sampled read-only Azure evidence when the active client exposes it, then sanitized user evidence.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, broad scope, destructive changes, and hand-wavy production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
References
Load these only when needed:
- Operations guide — use for service-specific pitfalls, design rules, verification targets, and pushback criteria.
- MCP and evidence path — use when choosing documentation-based evidence, sampled read-only Azure evidence, or sanitized user evidence.
- Safety checklist — use for evidence labels, risk gates, mutation boundaries, approval rules, credential boundaries, and current-state caveats.
- Workflow and output contract — use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.
- Official sources — use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.
Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.
1---2name: azure-governance-policy-guardrails3description: Azure Governance Policy Guardrails4---56# Azure Governance Policy Guardrails78## Purpose910Design or review Azure governance guardrails with Azure Policy in a way that is enforceable, scope-aware, and safe to roll out.1112## When to use1314Use this skill when the user asks for:1516- Azure Policy design or review,17- initiatives versus single policy choices,18- management-group or subscription assignment placement,19- exclusions, exemptions, or inheritance concerns,20- tag governance,21- allowed locations, resource types, or SKU restrictions,22- brownfield governance hardening,23- compliance enforcement rollout safety.2425Do not use this as a substitute for full regulatory interpretation, SOC operations, or writing full organization-specific policy JSON unless the user asks for that next.2627## Lean operating rules2829- Prefer Microsoft Learn documentation through the user's configured documentation MCP, then sampled read-only Azure evidence when the active client exposes it, then sanitized user evidence.30- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.31- Challenge broad access, broad scope, destructive changes, and hand-wavy production claims.32- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.3334## References3536Load these only when needed:3738- [Operations guide](references/policy-guardrail-operations.md) — use for service-specific pitfalls, design rules, verification targets, and pushback criteria.39- [MCP and evidence path](references/mcp-and-evidence.md) — use when choosing documentation-based evidence, sampled read-only Azure evidence, or sanitized user evidence.40- [Safety checklist](references/safety-checklist.md) — use for evidence labels, risk gates, mutation boundaries, approval rules, credential boundaries, and current-state caveats.41- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full review, applying stress checks, or formatting the final answer.42- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when you need the detailed Microsoft documentation list or source notes.4344## Response minimum4546Return, at minimum:4748- the scoped target and evidence level,49- the main risks or control gaps,50- the safest next actions,51- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.