Security And Hardening

安全和加固

概览

面向 Web 应用的安全优先开发实践。把每个外部输入都视为敌意输入，把每个 secret 都视为不可泄露，把每次授权检查都视为必需。安全不是一个阶段，而是触及用户数据、认证或外部系统的每一行代码都必须满足的约束。

何时使用

• 构建任何接受用户输入的东西
• 实现认证或授权
• 存储或传输敏感数据
• 集成外部 API 或服务
• 添加文件上传、webhooks 或 callbacks
• 处理支付或 PII 数据

三层边界系统

必须始终执行（无例外）

• 在系统边界验证所有外部输入（API routes、form handlers）
• 参数化所有数据库查询，绝不要把用户输入拼接进 SQL
• 编码输出 以防止 XSS（使用框架自动转义，不要绕过它）
• 所有外部通信使用 HTTPS
• 使用 bcrypt/scrypt/argon2 哈希密码（绝不存储明文）
• 设置安全 header（CSP、HSTS、X-Frame-Options、X-Content-Type-Options）
• 会话使用 httpOnly、secure、sameSite cookies
• 每次发布前运行 npm audit（或等价工具）

先询问（需要人工批准）

• 添加新的认证流程或修改 auth 逻辑
• 存储新的敏感数据类别（PII、支付信息）
• 添加新的外部服务集成
• 修改 CORS 配置
• 添加文件上传 handler
• 修改 rate limiting 或 throttling
• 授予提升后的权限或角色

绝不执行

• 绝不要将 secrets commit 到版本控制（API keys、passwords、tokens）
• 绝不要记录敏感数据到日志（passwords、tokens、完整信用卡号）
• 绝不要把客户端校验当作安全边界
• 绝不要为了方便禁用安全 header
• 绝不要对用户提供的数据使用 eval() 或 innerHTML
• 绝不要把会话存储在客户端可访问的存储中（auth tokens 放在 localStorage）
• 绝不要向用户暴露 stack traces 或内部错误细节

OWASP Top 10 防护

1. Injection（SQL、NoSQL、OS Command）

// BAD: SQL injection via string concatenation
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = '${userId}'`;

// GOOD: Parameterized query
const user = await db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1', [userId]);

// GOOD: ORM with parameterized input
const user = await prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { id: userId } });

2. Broken Authentication

// Password hashing
import { hash, compare } from 'bcrypt';

const SALT_ROUNDS = 12;
const hashedPassword = await hash(plaintext, SALT_ROUNDS);
const isValid = await compare(plaintext, hashedPassword);

// Session management
app.use(session({
  secret: process.env.SESSION_SECRET,  // From environment, not code
  resave: false,
  saveUninitialized: false,
  cookie: {
    httpOnly: true,     // Not accessible via JavaScript
    secure: true,       // HTTPS only
    sameSite: 'lax',    // CSRF protection
    maxAge: 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000,  // 24 hours
  },
}));

3. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

// BAD: Rendering user input as HTML
element.innerHTML = userInput;

// GOOD: Use framework auto-escaping (React does this by default)
return <div>{userInput}</div>;

// If you MUST render HTML, sanitize first
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput);

4. Broken Access Control

// Always check authorization, not just authentication
app.patch('/api/tasks/:id', authenticate, async (req, res) => {
  const task = await taskService.findById(req.params.id);

  // Check that the authenticated user owns this resource
  if (task.ownerId !== req.user.id) {
    return res.status(403).json({
      error: { code: 'FORBIDDEN', message: 'Not authorized to modify this task' }
    });
  }

  // Proceed with update
  const updated = await taskService.update(req.params.id, req.body);
  return res.json(updated);
});

5. Security Misconfiguration

// Security headers (use helmet for Express)
import helmet from 'helmet';
app.use(helmet());

// Content Security Policy
app.use(helmet.contentSecurityPolicy({
  directives: {
    defaultSrc: ["'self'"],
    scriptSrc: ["'self'"],
    styleSrc: ["'self'", "'unsafe-inline'"],  // Tighten if possible
    imgSrc: ["'self'", 'data:', 'https:'],
    connectSrc: ["'self'"],
  },
}));

// CORS — restrict to known origins
app.use(cors({
  origin: process.env.ALLOWED_ORIGINS?.split(',') || 'http://localhost:3000',
  credentials: true,
}));

6. Sensitive Data Exposure

// Never return sensitive fields in API responses
function sanitizeUser(user: UserRecord): PublicUser {
  const { passwordHash, resetToken, ...publicFields } = user;
  return publicFields;
}

// Use environment variables for secrets
const API_KEY = process.env.STRIPE_API_KEY;
if (!API_KEY) throw new Error('STRIPE_API_KEY not configured');

输入校验模式

在边界进行 Schema Validation

import { z } from 'zod';

const CreateTaskSchema = z.object({
  title: z.string().min(1).max(200).trim(),
  description: z.string().max(2000).optional(),
  priority: z.enum(['low', 'medium', 'high']).default('medium'),
  dueDate: z.string().datetime().optional(),
});

// Validate at the route handler
app.post('/api/tasks', async (req, res) => {
  const result = CreateTaskSchema.safeParse(req.body);
  if (!result.success) {
    return res.status(422).json({
      error: {
        code: 'VALIDATION_ERROR',
        message: 'Invalid input',
        details: result.error.flatten(),
      },
    });
  }
  // result.data is now typed and validated
  const task = await taskService.create(result.data);
  return res.status(201).json(task);
});

文件上传安全

// Restrict file types and sizes
const ALLOWED_TYPES = ['image/jpeg', 'image/png', 'image/webp'];
const MAX_SIZE = 5 * 1024 * 1024; // 5MB

function validateUpload(file: UploadedFile) {
  if (!ALLOWED_TYPES.includes(file.mimetype)) {
    throw new ValidationError('File type not allowed');
  }
  if (file.size > MAX_SIZE) {
    throw new ValidationError('File too large (max 5MB)');
  }
  // Don't trust the file extension — check magic bytes if critical
}

分流 npm audit 结果

不是所有 audit 发现都需要立即处理。使用这个决策树：

npm audit reports a vulnerability
├── Severity: critical or high
│   ├── Is the vulnerable code reachable in your app?
│   │   ├── YES --> Fix immediately (update, patch, or replace the dependency)
│   │   └── NO (dev-only dep, unused code path) --> Fix soon, but not a blocker
│   └── Is a fix available?
│       ├── YES --> Update to the patched version
│       └── NO --> Check for workarounds, consider replacing the dependency, or add to allowlist with a review date
├── Severity: moderate
│   ├── Reachable in production? --> Fix in the next release cycle
│   └── Dev-only? --> Fix when convenient, track in backlog
└── Severity: low
    └── Track and fix during regular dependency updates

关键问题：

• 存在漏洞的函数是否真的会在你的代码路径中被调用？
• 该依赖是 runtime dependency 还是 dev-only？
• 在你的部署上下文中，该漏洞是否可被利用（例如 client-only app 中的 server-side vulnerability）？

当你延期修复时，记录原因并设置 review date。

Rate Limiting

import rateLimit from 'express-rate-limit';

// General API rate limit
app.use('/api/', rateLimit({
  windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes
  max: 100,                   // 100 requests per window
  standardHeaders: true,
  legacyHeaders: false,
}));

// Stricter limit for auth endpoints
app.use('/api/auth/', rateLimit({
  windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000,
  max: 10,  // 10 attempts per 15 minutes
}));

Secrets 管理

.env files:
  ├── .env.example  → Committed (template with placeholder values)
  ├── .env          → NOT committed (contains real secrets)
  └── .env.local    → NOT committed (local overrides)

.gitignore must include:
  .env
  .env.local
  .env.*.local
  *.pem
  *.key

提交前始终检查：

# Check for accidentally staged secrets
git diff --cached | grep -i "password\|secret\|api_key\|token"

安全审查检查清单

### Authentication
- [ ] Passwords hashed with bcrypt/scrypt/argon2 (salt rounds ≥ 12)
- [ ] Session tokens are httpOnly, secure, sameSite
- [ ] Login has rate limiting
- [ ] Password reset tokens expire

### Authorization
- [ ] Every endpoint checks user permissions
- [ ] Users can only access their own resources
- [ ] Admin actions require admin role verification

### Input
- [ ] All user input validated at the boundary
- [ ] SQL queries are parameterized
- [ ] HTML output is encoded/escaped

### Data
- [ ] No secrets in code or version control
- [ ] Sensitive fields excluded from API responses
- [ ] PII encrypted at rest (if applicable)

### Infrastructure
- [ ] Security headers configured (CSP, HSTS, etc.)
- [ ] CORS restricted to known origins
- [ ] Dependencies audited for vulnerabilities
- [ ] Error messages don't expose internals

另请参阅

详细安全检查清单和 pre-commit 验证步骤见 references/security-checklist.md。

常见合理化借口

危险信号

• 用户输入直接传入数据库查询、shell commands 或 HTML rendering
• 源代码或 commit history 中有 secrets
• API endpoints 没有认证或授权检查
• 缺少 CORS 配置，或使用通配符（*）origins
• 认证 endpoints 没有 rate limiting
• Stack traces 或内部错误暴露给用户
• 依赖存在已知 critical 漏洞

验证

实现安全相关代码后：

• npm audit 没有 critical 或 high 漏洞
• 源代码或 git history 中没有 secrets
• 所有用户输入都在系统边界验证
• 每个受保护 endpoint 都检查认证和授权
• 响应中存在安全 header（用 browser DevTools 检查）
• 错误响应不暴露内部细节
• auth endpoints 已启用 rate limiting