Vtex Io Service Configuration Apps

Service Configuration Apps

When this skill applies

Use this skill when a VTEX IO service should receive structured configuration from another app through the configuration builder instead of relying only on local app settings.

• Creating a configuration app with the configuration builder
• Exposing configuration entrypoints from a service app
• Sharing one configuration contract across multiple services or apps
• Separating configuration lifecycle from runtime app lifecycle
• Reading injected configuration through ctx.vtex.settings

Do not use this skill for:

• simple app-local configuration managed only through settingsSchema
• Store Framework block settings through contentSchemas.json
• generic service runtime wiring unrelated to configuration
• policy design beyond the configuration-specific permissions required

Decision rules

• Treat the service app and the configuration app as separate responsibilities.
• The service app owns runtime (node, graphql, etc.), declares the configuration builder in manifest.json, defines configuration/schema.json, and reads injected values through ctx.vtex.settings.
• The configuration app does not own the service runtime. It should not declare node or graphql builders and usually has only the configuration builder.
• The configuration app points to the target service in the configuration field and provides concrete values in <service-app>/configuration.json.
• Use a configuration app when the configuration contract should live independently from the app that consumes it.
• Prefer a configuration app when multiple apps or services need to share the same configuration model.
• In service apps, expose configuration entrypoints explicitly through settingsType: "workspace" in node/service.json routes or events, or through @settings in GraphQL when the service should receive configuration from a configuration app.
• In configuration apps, the folder name under configuration/ and the key in the configuration field should match the target service app ID, for example shipping-service in vendor.shipping-service.
• The shape of configuration.json must respect the JSON Schema declared by the service app.
• Read received configuration from ctx.vtex.settings inside the service runtime instead of making your own HTTP call just to fetch those values.
• Handlers and resolvers should cast or validate ctx.vtex.settings to match the configuration schema and apply defaults consistent with that schema.
• Treat configuration apps as a way to inject structured runtime configuration through VTEX IO context, not as a replacement for arbitrary operational data storage.
• Use settingsSchema when configuration is local to one app and should be edited directly in Apps > App Settings. Use configuration apps when the contract should be shared, versioned, or decoupled from the consuming app lifecycle.
• If a service configured through a configuration app fails to resolve workspace app configuration due to permissions, explicitly evaluate whether the manifest needs the read-workspace-apps policy for that scenario. Do not add this policy by default to unrelated services.
• For service configuration contracts, prefer closed schemas with additionalProperties: false and use definitions plus $ref when the structure becomes more complex.

Hard constraints

Constraint: Service apps must explicitly opt in to receiving configuration

A service app MUST declare where configuration can be injected, using settingsType: "workspace" in node/service.json routes or events, or the @settings directive in GraphQL.

Why this matters

Configuration apps do not magically apply to all service entrypoints. The service must explicitly mark which routes, events, or queries resolve runtime configuration.

Detection

If a service is expected to receive configuration but its routes, events, or GraphQL queries do not declare settingsType or @settings, STOP and expose the configuration boundary first.

Correct

{
  "routes": {
    "status": {
      "path": "/_v/status/:code",
      "public": true,
      "settingsType": "workspace"
    }
  }
}

Wrong

{
  "routes": {
    "status": {
      "path": "/_v/status/:code",
      "public": true
    }
  }
}

Constraint: Configuration shape must be defined with explicit schema files

Configuration apps and the services they configure MUST use explicit schema files instead of implicit or undocumented payloads.

Why this matters

Without configuration/schema.json and matching configuration.json contracts, shared configuration becomes ambiguous and error-prone across apps.

Detection

If a configuration app is introduced without a clear schema file or the service accepts loosely defined configuration payloads, STOP and define the schema first.

Correct

{
  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
  "$ref": "#/definitions/ServiceConfiguration",
  "definitions": {
    "ServiceConfiguration": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "bank": {
          "type": "object",
          "properties": {
            "account": { "type": "string" },
            "workspace": { "type": "string", "default": "master" },
            "version": { "type": "string" },
            "kycVersion": { "type": "string" },
            "payoutVersion": { "type": "string" },
            "host": { "type": "string" }
          },
          "required": ["account", "version", "kycVersion", "payoutVersion", "host"],
          "additionalProperties": false
        }
      },
      "required": ["bank"],
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
  }
}

Wrong

{
  "anything": true
}

Constraint: Consuming apps must read injected configuration from runtime context, not by inventing extra fetches

When a service is configured through a configuration app, it MUST consume the injected values from ctx.vtex.settings instead of creating its own ad hoc HTTP call just to retrieve the same configuration.

Why this matters

The purpose of configuration apps is to let VTEX IO inject the structured configuration directly into service context. Adding a custom fetch layer on top creates unnecessary complexity and loses the main runtime advantage of the builder.

Detection

If a service already exposes settingsType or @settings but still performs its own backend fetch to retrieve the same configuration, STOP and move the read to ctx.vtex.settings.

Correct

export async function handleStatus(ctx: Context) {
  const settings = ctx.vtex.settings
  const code = ctx.vtex.route.params.code

  const status = resolveStatus(code, settings)
  ctx.body = { status }
}

Wrong

export async function handleStatus(ctx: Context) {
  const settings = await ctx.clients.partnerApi.getSettings()
  ctx.body = settings
}

Preferred pattern

Model the service and the configuration app as separate contracts:

1. The service app exposes where configuration can be resolved.
2. The service app defines accepted structure in configuration/schema.json.
3. The configuration app declares the service as a builder and supplies values in configuration.json.
4. The service reads the injected configuration through ctx.vtex.settings.

Example: service app vendor.shipping-service

manifest.json:

{
  "vendor": "vendor",
  "name": "shipping-service",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "builders": {
    "node": "7.x",
    "configuration": "1.x"
  }
}

configuration/schema.json:

{
  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
  "$ref": "#/definitions/ShippingConfiguration",
  "definitions": {
    "ShippingConfiguration": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "carrierApi": {
          "type": "object",
          "properties": {
            "baseUrl": { "type": "string" },
            "apiKey": { "type": "string", "format": "password" },
            "timeoutMs": { "type": "integer", "default": 3000 }
          },
          "required": ["baseUrl", "apiKey"],
          "additionalProperties": false
        }
      },
      "required": ["carrierApi"],
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
  }
}

Example: configuration app vendor.shipping-config

manifest.json:

{
  "vendor": "vendor",
  "name": "shipping-config",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "builders": {
    "configuration": "1.x"
  },
  "configuration": {
    "shipping-service": "1.x"
  }
}

configuration/shipping-service/configuration.json:

{
  "carrierApi": {
    "baseUrl": "https://api.carrier.com",
    "apiKey": "secret-api-key-here",
    "timeoutMs": 5000
  }
}

Example: Node service consuming injected configuration

export async function createShipment(ctx: Context, next: () => Promise<void>) {
  const settings = ctx.vtex.settings as {
    carrierApi: {
      baseUrl: string
      apiKey: string
      timeoutMs?: number
    }
  }

  const timeoutMs = settings.carrierApi.timeoutMs ?? 3000

  const response = await ctx.clients.carrier.createShipment({
    baseUrl: settings.carrierApi.baseUrl,
    apiKey: settings.carrierApi.apiKey,
    timeoutMs,
    payload: ctx.state.shipmentPayload,
  })

  ctx.body = response
  await next()
}

Example: GraphQL query using @settings

type ShippingStatus {
  orderId: ID!
  status: String!
}

type Query {
  shippingStatus(orderId: ID!): ShippingStatus
    @settings(type: "workspace")
}

export const resolvers = {
  Query: {
    shippingStatus: async (_: unknown, args: { orderId: string }, ctx: Context) => {
      const settings = ctx.vtex.settings as {
        carrierApi: { baseUrl: string; apiKey: string }
      }

      return ctx.clients.carrier.getStatus({
        baseUrl: settings.carrierApi.baseUrl,
        apiKey: settings.carrierApi.apiKey,
        orderId: args.orderId,
      })
    },
  },
}

Minimum working checklist for service configuration apps:

• The service app declares the configuration builder in manifest.json.
• The service app defines a valid configuration/schema.json.
• The configuration app provides <service-app>/configuration.json with values compatible with the schema.
• Service routes or events that need configuration declare settingsType: "workspace".
• When the flow depends on workspace app resolution, the service manifest evaluates whether read-workspace-apps is required.

Use this approach when configuration should be shared, versioned, and injected by VTEX IO runtime rather than fetched ad hoc by service code.

Common failure modes

• Using app settings when the real need is a shared configuration contract across apps.
• Creating configuration apps without explicit schema files.
• Forgetting settingsType or @settings in the service that should receive configuration.
• Fetching configuration over HTTP even though it is already injected in ctx.vtex.settings.
• Treating configuration apps as general-purpose operational storage.

Review checklist

• Is a configuration app really needed instead of plain settingsSchema?
• Could this case be solved with local app settings and settingsSchema instead of a separate configuration app?
• Does the service explicitly opt in to configuration resolution with settingsType or @settings?
• When configuration is injected through service routes or events, is settingsType: "workspace" declared where needed?
• Is the configuration contract defined through configuration/schema.json and matched by configuration.json?
• Does the service read configuration from ctx.vtex.settings instead of inventing extra fetches?
• If the flow depends on reading installed workspace apps or their configuration, was read-workspace-apps evaluated intentionally instead of added by default?
• Does the configuration schema stay closed and explicit enough for a shared contract?
• Is the configuration contract clearly separate from operational data storage?

Reference

• Developing service configuration apps - Official guide for service and configuration apps
• Builders - Overview of the configuration builder
• Service - Service configuration context for node and GraphQL services