wendylabsinc Wendy Self-Hosted Rule
The wendy stack (wendyos / wendy-agent) must ALWAYS be able to run without the SaaS stack.
Every agent working on interop must keep the self-hosted path intact — or create it where it doesn't exist yet. A SaaS-only feature is an incomplete feature.
This is not a preference or a stretch goal. Wendy serves critical-infrastructure partners who will not — and in some cases legally cannot — run their fleet control loop through a vendor's multi-tenant cloud. If a change only works when pki-core, Wendy Cloud, or wendy-auth are the managed GCP services, it is not done.
Scope
- wendy-agent / wendyos — always. The device fleet's core loop (enrollment, renewal, postbox polling, image pull) must work with zero SaaS reachability from the device's perspective beyond whatever the operator's own private infrastructure provides.
- pki-core — must itself be self-hostable. It is the trust root for both profiles; it cannot itself hard-depend on GCP.
- wendy-auth — potentially later, but write for it now. No path in wendy-auth service code should hard-assume GCP or SaaS reachability, even before a self-hosted wendy-auth ships. Retrofitting this later is far more expensive than not regressing it now.
The Two Deployment Profiles
The contract treats self-hosted as a first-class deployment profile, not an afterthought — cite this when someone claims SaaS-only is fine (§11.1):
| Managed (GCP) | Self-hosted | |
|---|---|---|
| Network isolation | Private Service Connect endpoints inside a VPC Service Controls perimeter — no public IPs, no open-internet egress for control-plane RPCs | The operator's own private network / service mesh; no PSC/VPC-SC |
| Transport auth (fabric) | v1 target: uniform GCP-WI-OIDC across all fabric legs (Google-signed, audience-bound OIDC token, verified via Google's JWKS + a caller-service-account allowlist) | mTLS carries the weight — retained as the self-hosted backend (post-v1) (§6, §11.1) |
Either way, the invariant holds: authority is never transport-derived — the transport just says which service is calling; a principal's authority always rides as an in-message signed artifact.
Never Assume
No service or device code path may hard-assume reachability of:
- The GCP metadata server
- PSC (Private Service Connect) endpoints
- VPC-SC (VPC Service Controls)
- Google's JWKS endpoint
- Artifact Registry
- A reachable cloud control plane at all
The contract's degraded-mode behaviors exist precisely for this last one — e.g. online enrollment is designed to survive the cloud being unreachable at redemption time (v0.12, §5.4), and device runtime behavior fails safe (hold state, alert) rather than treating cloud reachability as a precondition for correctness. If a design only works with a live cloud connection, it needs a fail-safe degraded mode, not a shrug.
Provider/backend selection is by config, never by a hard-wired issuer: no code path may assume a specific identity provider or trust root (D11).
How to Add the Seam
When a feature needs a SaaS service (GCP metadata, PSC, a Google-issued token, cloud reachability, etc.), don't wire the SaaS backend in directly. Instead:
- Define the interface the feature actually needs (e.g. "give me a verifiable service identity," not "call the GCP metadata server").
- Make the managed (GCP) implementation one backend behind that interface — not the only path.
- Provide the self-hosted backend — or, if it isn't built yet, stub it behind the seam with a tracked issue. The seam existing and being selected by config is what matters; the self-hosted backend can land later, but the interface must not assume GCP going in.
- Select the backend by config, handing peers the matching trust bundle. No environment-sniffing, no "it's probably GCP" defaults baked into call sites.
Use the D11 pluggable-identity-provider pattern as the reference shape for this: see references/identity-backends.md for how the mesh workload-identity lifecycle implements exactly this seam with three interchangeable backends.
Source of Truth
This skill distills the AAA Contract v0.12 (draft, pending engineering approval). The living contract lives in Linear: AAA Contract — Authentication, Authorization, Accounting. It is versioned and evolving: check it for flow-level detail, and if it disagrees with this skill, the contract wins — then update this skill.
Related Skills
- wendy-aaa-interop — the responsibility split and two-key authority this rule protects.
- wendy-certificates — requesting and holding certificates; each backend here has to work.
- wendy-device-enrollment — device lifecycle; online/offline enrollment both keep degraded mode.
- wendy-device-interop — agent runtime behavior; the fail-safe catalogue this rule requires.
- wendy-security-baselines — invariants any interop PR must respect, alongside this one.
Each of those skills carries a mandatory pointer back to this one — if you're touching interop code from any of them, this rule applies.