Pwrl Refresh Learnings

PWRL Refresh Learnings

Review existing learnings for staleness, consolidation opportunities, or needed updates.

Interaction Method

• Use platform's ask_user_question, ask_user, ask_user_input, vscode/askQuestions or any available extension/tool for user interaction for all decisions
• Ask one question at a time
• Use multiple-choice questions when possible
• If input is empty, ask: "What learnings would you like to refresh? Provide a category, tag, file path, or scope to review."
• Provide clear recovery suggestions when errors occur

Purpose

• Keep docs/learnings/ accurate, current, and non-duplicative
• Decide what to update/consolidate/archive, then execute with user approval
• Sync docs/learnings/INDEX.md so descriptions stay current

Usage

/pwrl-refresh-learnings
/pwrl-refresh-learnings authentication
/pwrl-refresh-learnings technical-fix
/pwrl-refresh-learnings file:docs/learnings/pattern/example.md

Support Files

• references/assessment-criteria.md — Assessment methodology and update procedures
• docs/learnings/INDEX.md — Canonical index to audit and sync

Workflow

Phase 1: Select Scope

1. If no scope is provided, ask the user what to review (file, category, tag/keyword, date range).
2. Load docs/learnings/INDEX.md first and use it as the candidate list when possible.
3. Limit scope to a small batch (target 3-10 docs). If it’s broader, ask the user to narrow.

Phase 2: Assess and Propose Actions

1. Read each candidate learning end-to-end.
2. Assess freshness, duplication, and gaps (use references/assessment-criteria.md).
3. Propose one action per doc:
   • Current (no change)
   • Update (improve or extend)
   • Superseded (link to newer doc)
   • Consolidate (merge duplicates)
   • Archive (move to docs/learnings/archive/)
4. Present the proposed action list and ask the user what to execute.

Phase 3: Execute and Sync Index

1. Apply the selected updates (preserve intent; don’t delete without archiving).
2. After changes, sync docs/learnings/INDEX.md (or run /pwrl-update-learnings if available).
3. Report what changed and what was intentionally left unchanged.

Acceptance Criteria

• Scope is clearly defined and candidates are identified from docs/learnings/INDEX.md when possible
• Each reviewed doc has an explicit proposed action (Current/Update/Superseded/Consolidate/Archive)
• If updates are executed, docs/learnings/INDEX.md is updated to match the new state

When to Use

• After major refactors, migrations, or dependency upgrades
• When you notice duplicates or contradictions in docs/learnings/
• Periodically for high-churn areas (auth, CI, infra, build tooling)

Best Practices

• Ask before archiving or consolidating; prefer reversible changes
• Preserve the original learning’s intent; add context rather than rewriting history
• Keep scope small (3-10 docs) to avoid turning refresh into a multi-day project

Rules

• Never delete learnings; archive instead when removing from active use.
• When consolidating, keep one canonical doc and update incoming links.
• After executing updates, sync docs/learnings/INDEX.md (or run /pwrl-update-learnings).
• If anything is ambiguous, stop and ask the user before applying changes.