Claims Extractor
Triggers & routing
- Trigger: claims extractor, extract claims, contributions, assumptions, peer review, 审稿, 主张提取.
- Use when: 审稿/评审或 evidence audit,需要把主张列表落盘并可追溯到原文位置(section/page/quote)。
- Skip if: 没有可用的稿件/全文(例如缺少
output/PAPER.md或等价文本)。 - Network: none.
- Guardrail: 每条 claim 必须带可定位的 source pointer;区分 empirical vs conceptual claims。
Transforms manuscript text into a traceable claim ledger for paper-review.
Input
output/PAPER.md
Output
output/CLAIMS.mdoutput/CLAIMS.jsonl(review-claim.v1, one addressable claim per line)
Contract
Each claim block must include:
- claim text
- type:
empiricalorconceptual - scope
- source pointer back into
output/PAPER.md
The Markdown and JSONL files are two views of the same claim records. Downstream skills should prefer JSONL and retain Markdown fallback for older Workspaces.
Script boundary
scripts/run.py should:
- detect claim-like sentences
- normalize them into stable claim blocks
- attach source pointers
- separate empirical and conceptual claims
Keep parsing and ranking heuristics in shared review tooling, not in the skill script.
Acceptance
output/CLAIMS.mdexistsoutput/CLAIMS.jsonlexists and every record has a stableclaim_id- every claim has a source pointer
- empirical and conceptual claims are separated
Non-goals
- judging whether a claim is good
- generating evidence gaps
- writing review prose