Gpt Pro Algorithm Pipeline

GPT Pro Algorithm Pipeline

Orchestrate the existing bridge skills; do not duplicate their implementation.

Read the canonical state and lifecycle rules at ../gpt-pro-question-window/references/bridge_protocol.md before the first external round.

Pipeline

1. Determine the decision the user needs and select algorithm_review, experiment_analysis, paper_brainstorm, implementation_check, or general_question.
2. Use $gpt-pro-project-workspace to preview routing. Stop and work locally for local_only; repair or verify an ambiguous Project binding; otherwise preserve the returned Project, Thread, and conversation policy for the entire round.
3. Use $bundle-algorithm-context to write current Codex notes and build a focused evidence artifact on that identity.
4. Select the prompt family:
   • $gpt-pro-research-algorithm-reviewer for algorithm, pipeline, and experiment critique.
   • $gpt-pro-paper-brainstormer for paper framing.
   • $gpt-pro-question-window for a normal question.
5. Use $gpt-pro-question-window to upload through a visible control, verify the attachment, gate the exact requested model, send once, release the browser, and follow its native-response handoff and fallback rules to capture the full raw exchange on the same bridge-thread-id.
6. Re-open the repository evidence and classify every actionable claim as verified, partially verified, unsupported, or inapplicable.
7. Record that result as a separate codex-verdict event before implementing it.
8. Use $experiment-plan-generator when empirical evidence is required. Prefer the cheapest sanity or kill experiment before expensive work.
9. Implement only changes authorized by the user and justified by the local verdict. Run focused checks while editing and the relevant full suite at the end.
10. Use $implementation-consistency-checker before trusting experimental results or declaring the implementation complete.
11. Verify the thread with verify_bridge_thread.py --require-complete-rounds; in Project mode also verify the Bridge Project. Update Codex notes and repeat only when another GPT Pro round has a concrete unresolved question.

Completion criterion: the thread contains a verified snapshot/exchange/verdict chain for every external round; exact model and attachment provenance are recorded; the final answer distinguishes GPT Pro advice from locally verified facts; implemented changes and tests are recorded; and no open critical inconsistency is hidden.

Handoff to the user

Report:

• Evidence artifact and GPT Pro turn.
• Main external conclusions.
• Codex verification, including rejected or unsupported claims.
• Experiment or implementation performed.
• Tests and remaining uncertainty.
• Go, iterate, or stop decision.

Do not use this full pipeline for a small local bug, formatting change, or task that does not benefit from external reasoning.

standalone remains a complete path for a small project or one-off review. Project mode adds shared context and task organization; it does not replace the existing thread protocol.