How do I install the Prp Review skill?

Run npx skillmds add wirasm/prp-review in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Prp Review safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Capability flags: docs only. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Prp Review?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Prp Review free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Prp Review?

Wirasm (@wirasm) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Prp Review by wirasm — Agent Skill

Name: Prp Review
Rating: 4.666666666666667 (3 reviews)
Author: Wirasm

Prp Review

Reviews GitHub pull requests through specialist review agents, runs repository validation, verifies corrections, aggregates findings, and posts the result. Defaults to code, seam, and simplification review; the operator can add scopes or explicitly request only selected scopes. Use when the operator asks to review a PR, re-review fixes, check whether a PR is ready to merge, run review agents, or invokes $prp-review.

Wirasm b462acc 3 files · 21.8 KB Updated Sep 10, 2026

File contents

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS (and $1, $2, ...) refer to the arguments given when this skill was invoked. Take them from the user's request; if absent, infer them from the conversation.

Review a Pull Request

Coordinate an evidence-based PR review. Reviewer agents are the only path for judging the code: do not add an inline review pass before or after them.

Input: $ARGUMENTS (if absent, use the current branch's PR).

Let workflows/agents.md own scope selection, reviewer dispatch, correction verification, aggregation, and publication. Pass the operator's scope intent and flags through without rebuilding those contracts here.

Resolve the canonical store before starting:

# --- PRP store resolver (canonical; keep byte-identical across skills) ---
# Adopt the store that already records this root; mint a key only when none does.
_gd="$(git rev-parse --path-format=absolute --git-common-dir 2>/dev/null)"
case "$_gd" in */.git) _root="${_gd%/.git}" ;; "") _root="$PWD" ;; *) _root="$_gd" ;; esac
_root="$(cd "$_root" && pwd -P)"
_name="$(basename "$_root" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | tr -cs 'a-z0-9' '-' | sed 's/^-*//;s/-*$//')"
_home="${PRP_HOME:-$HOME/.prp}"
_hit="$(grep -lsF "\"path\": \"$_root\"" "$_home"/*/project.json 2>/dev/null | head -1)"
PRP_DIR="${_hit%/project.json}"
[ -n "$PRP_DIR" ] || PRP_DIR="$_home/${_name:-project}-$(printf %s "$_root" | git hash-object --stdin | cut -c1-8)"
mkdir -p "$PRP_DIR"; [ -f "$PRP_DIR/project.json" ] || printf '{"path": "%s", "name": "%s"}\n' "$_root" "${_name:-project}" > "$PRP_DIR/project.json"

Read workflows/agents.md and execute it end-to-end. Before producing the report, read templates/review-report.md and follow its output contract exactly.

Resources

workflows/agents.md — PR resolution, validation, agent scopes, aggregation, and publication
templates/review-report.md — canonical local and GitHub review format

---name: prp-reviewdescription: Reviews GitHub pull requests through specialist review agents, runs repository validation, verifies corrections, aggregates findings, and posts the result. Defaults to code, seam, and simplification review; the operator can add scopes or explicitly request only selected scopes. Use when the operator asks to review a PR, re-review fixes, check whether a PR is ready to merge, run review agents, or invokes $prp-review.---> **Arguments:** `$ARGUMENTS` (and `$1`, `$2`, ...) refer to the arguments given when this skill was invoked. Take them from the user's request; if absent, infer them from the conversation.# Review a Pull RequestCoordinate an evidence-based PR review. Reviewer agents are the only path for judging the code:do not add an inline review pass before or after them.**Input**: $ARGUMENTS (if absent, use the current branch's PR).Let `workflows/agents.md` own scope selection, reviewer dispatch, correction verification,aggregation, and publication. Pass the operator's scope intent and flags through without rebuildingthose contracts here.Resolve the canonical store before starting:```bash# --- PRP store resolver (canonical; keep byte-identical across skills) ---# Adopt the store that already records this root; mint a key only when none does._gd="$(git rev-parse --path-format=absolute --git-common-dir 2>/dev/null)"case "$_gd" in */.git) _root="${_gd%/.git}" ;; "") _root="$PWD" ;; *) _root="$_gd" ;; esac_root="$(cd "$_root" && pwd -P)"_name="$(basename "$_root" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | tr -cs 'a-z0-9' '-' | sed 's/^-*//;s/-*$//')"_home="${PRP_HOME:-$HOME/.prp}"_hit="$(grep -lsF "\"path\": \"$_root\"" "$_home"/*/project.json 2>/dev/null | head -1)"PRP_DIR="${_hit%/project.json}"[ -n "$PRP_DIR" ] || PRP_DIR="$_home/${_name:-project}-$(printf %s "$_root" | git hash-object --stdin | cut -c1-8)"mkdir -p "$PRP_DIR"; [ -f "$PRP_DIR/project.json" ] || printf '{"path": "%s", "name": "%s"}\n' "$_root" "${_name:-project}" > "$PRP_DIR/project.json"```Read `workflows/agents.md` and execute it end-to-end. Before producing the report, read`templates/review-report.md` and follow its output contract exactly.## Resources- `workflows/agents.md` — PR resolution, validation, agent scopes, aggregation, and publication- `templates/review-report.md` — canonical local and GitHub review format

Frequently asked questions